Gun ownership itself is a slight mental illness

I'm not stopping them

And its not a low blow to point out you're not following the news or aren't interested in american politics (which was not assumed but literally stated by yourself. Just like that you dig having fun in those threads by annoying certain folks and disrupt the actual convo...). For fuck sakes, your reactions are far more pathetic and low. Consistently.

Not busy with that at all.

 

Hiked it in the 70s with two of my uncles and some friends as far as Virginia. Some of the vistas were amazing (hopefully they still are). Unfortunately, some of the locals we encountered were not (didn't like long hair etc).

 

Yes..... Go on...

 

Where I live all I've got is cornfields and the Floyd River to look at. The Floyd River is just a dinky little thing. Not exactly the Missourah. You're so lucky you have a chance to escape it all. All I've got is cornfields and this gray old murky water.

 

Maybe that's why I'm so clear headed and on point then. Lots of clear air makes for a clear mind. I would advise you city folks to take a weekend once a month into you national state parks and forestry.

 

and we've all heard how pretty you are.

 

Now you're finally getting it! You've been asked to explain how a flash suppressor is dangerous. You have failed to do so. And so it is your belief here that prevents further discussion.

If you ever come up with some reason for believing that a flash suppressor is dangerous, don't hesitate to share.

 

I'll take that as an admission on your part that you cannot come up with a reason for believing that a flash suppressor is dangerous.

What's the next accessory that you believe is dangerous, but really isn't?

 

What? We were poor when I was growing and ate squirrel and rabbit that my brothers hunted and I don't think "Extreme fear and paranoia" had anything to do with why they owned a gun.

 

And I'm laughing because you seem genuinely incapable of remembering what you wrote in post #284 regarding your rationale for believing that a flash suppressor is somehow dangerous. Why don't you pull the pertinent segment of that post and include it in your next post? How would a flash suppressor help a murderer?

Can you give me an instance in which a mass shooter or murderer was more effective because of a flash suppressor? Like a case where law enforcement made a complaint to the effect that there would have been less deaths if only the killer hadn't had a flash suppressor. Anything?

And then we can address your belief that a pistol grip makes a gun more deadly.

 

Shooting at a crowd at night. What non-military purpose does it serve?

 

Protects your eyes and ears and also the eyes and ears of surrounding fellow sports shooters.

/next.

 

How many mass shootings occurred at night? And can you give me an instance in which a mass shooter or murderer was more effective because of a flash suppressor? Like a case where law enforcement made a complaint to the effect that there would have been less deaths if only the killer hadn't had a flash suppressor. Anything?

 

It works in the same way and other development works when it comes to personal protection and safety. Notice it is listed under PPE or Personal Protective Equipment lists.

Next they'll be calling out tinted sunglasses lol.

OMG! Those protective sunglasses blocked out some of the sun and they were able to see and aim easier! Ban the safety glasses!

 

Rifle aren't bright in daytime, and flash suppressor don't primary reduce the sound of gunfire.

 

How many mass shootings occurred at night? And can you give me an instance in which a mass shooter or murderer was more effective because of a flash suppressor? Like a case where law enforcement made a complaint to the effect that there would have been less deaths if only the killer hadn't had a flash suppressor. Anything?