Thank you. Finally someone who is on topic. "fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity" Well peace does not exist in this world. Evil cannot be stopped on this earth. Some of us can stand apart and be different but as a whole most people choose the wrong path. There will always be an evil ruler that want's power and control. This evil ruler must always be stopped. Again think about hitler? he is a very good example. Something like that must not happen again. I don't see how I am ignorant. It's like this. Do you wanna be safe or do you not wanna be safe. it's black and white. There is not other way. This not the olden days. this is the future Yes. There needs to be a bully. I consider us a GOOD bully though. Overall I say we help people out. We have to be a bully to keep this world safe. With technology now days it's very easy for some evil group to annihilate people. Think about bombs/misseles. what i am saying is this global agency keeps the world safe from this groups that could threaten our existence. and in this day an age there is no other choice but to have a global agency.
The only problem with your statement is that our BULLYING has caused most of the major problems in the world, particularly the Middle East. You cannot bully other people and expect them to be nice to you. Bin Laden is a creation of our own making. We made him what he is, and by invading 2 more Islamic nations we gave him the necessary tools to gain thousands of recruits worldwide, while he had maybe 50(?) before. .
yes your statement is true. but again I call it the "secret global agency". They know a lot more than we know. They have their reasons
wow..... ... uh .. "peace doesnt exist in this world"? are you serious? how can u believe in evil without believing in good (peace)? i wont comment on the hitler statement. it is not black and white whatsoever. and what you're talking about is not the future, it is primitive. what in your mind makes you think its the future? once again, wow..... "fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity" is still true. a "good bully" is an oxymoron. and who are these evil people you're talking about that can "easily annihilate people"? so you honestly believe in terrorists? it's a made up concept so that the people on top with their corporate businesses profit. thats what war is, and thats why war exists besides maybe nations long ago fighting for land, resources, and assets. but thats once again primitive. WW2 was to assure america and the nato still held their assets instead of being taken over. not just to just "fight this evil entity". thats what people believe most because thats what the people on top feed the common man for their own selfish benefits. and ironically germany was protecting and trying to get more assets. it all boils down to the fundamental system we have that must change. and speaking of self-made wars, america specifically is very fond of it. its made war when unnecessary many times in the past, not just 9/11. the people on top know that when a nation is in war-time, it's economy booms. so for the great united states of america to stay in power it must replenish its economy by making war. those "evil people", tell me, who are they, why would they annihilate people, and how? to give a simple answer to what you're saying, a nation as the "good bully" is faulty because the concept itself doesn't make sense, the way it is achieved is wrong, and america particularly is terrible at being a good bully.
Conspiracy theories are always lacking in substantial evidence. If THEY did exist one would be foolish to trust one's fate to an agency that exercises control in secrecy. If that control is "secret" how would you know they are making decisions that would be beneficial to you or anyone else? World events of the recent past have been extremely detrimental to the world's economy and the people in it. .
dig the message and vibe of this tune, friends https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tDbPF07akE"]YouTube - The Roches - Everyone Is Good
Haha, I never suggested that the UK is perfect or more powerful. I'd still rather live here than in the US. (Though continental Europe does many things a lot better). Who can take over who is not a terribly useful metric. If America were to invade another reasonably powerful country the results would be catastrophic for both countries. As for the whole global control stuff, America does not have global control. No one entity has it. Does the concept of regional superpowers ring a bell? As for America "working to prevent technology destroying our world", don't make me laugh, honestly, do you seriously believe that drivel?
:toetap05:Quote: Originally Posted by Rugor without a good global control force how can you stop evil groups? nuclear proliferation and the security dilemma perhaps