Well, I agree that politics and art should be mixed, but not all art. I don't want to dissect the Beatles, I want to listen to them, and I hate it especially when artists can't just say their opinion, they need to hide it behind symbolism, and I always need to find out what they mean. If you do have a political voice, why are you trying to hide it?
getting sick and fucking tired of politics in my entertainment is what made me start listening to instrumentals.
they tried to deport lennon cuz he was callin the man on his shit before bill maher, there was dick cavett http://cavett.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/18/him-to-kick-around-again/ but a lil somn about the beatles they got too huge n everybody knows but they needed to breathe n go semi-solo prolly about 20 mins after they hit america they were too stressed out n smart, but jus kids that's when it all started to fall apart the white album - now you guys're jus high abbey road, let it be - spiral down into infinity they were given too much responsibility needed to pass that mojo around a lil show the yunguns how it's done but the suits gotta contract pre-invested vested interest n they don want artists so powerful elton john, u2, sting... streisand, springsteen that they get to jus say whatever they wanna cuz they're basically one o the people, originally n now wit enough money n peace o mind etc they gotta perspective view generate awareness if they wanna call on the common conscience that's why they tried to deport lennon "this guy could swing an election" - nixon tapes http://cavett.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/witness-for-thewho-exactly/