Would YOU vote for RON PAUL

Might someone elaborate the positive impact of continuing on a path to economic collapse?

 

And the longer we wait the more extreme it be claimed to be. Look at Greece.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJqM2tFOxLQ"]Alan Grayson (High Quality Version): Is Anyone Minding the Store at the Federal Reserve? - YouTube

Despite the negative consequences that this has on all of our lives, there are those who, for reasons only they can understand, want more if it.

 

And yeah, I got your EPA right here. They appear to obey the money.

http://www.ewg.org/reports/Free-Pass-for-Oil-and-Gas/Oil-and-Gas-Industry-Exemptions

 

Shameful and....embarrassing. Why would people want this to continue???? Geez...

 

Shameful is right. The amount of money missing, is equal to $30,000 per every man woman and child in America. And no one is even keeping track......WTF?

 

Wanting yet another four years with another president at the helm who is going to ignore the issues of illegal wars and a thieving Federal Reserve is akin to being the subject of a fraternity hazing; you get wacked over and over again, and then you say, "Thank you sir. May I have another?"

 

I would be more than happy to... if there was one.

 

To repeat-

Again the same problem with Ron and the Paulettes, they don’t seem capable of defending his and their right wing libertarian/neoliberal message.

Many criticisms of these deeply flawed ideologies have been made in the thread and what do we get from the Paulettes mainly a rift on the theme of – ‘he’s the man’ – he’s great, he’s the only honest politician, he’s not conserving his own pockets like the others, he’s full of minty goodness etc etc

They might as well be choosing the candidate with the most luscious hair or pert buttocks.

Rather than these facile comments why not actually try and address the criticism levelled at Ron and you.

 

You are only talking to avoid the subject of the illegal destruction of countries and the innocent people who live in them. You are only talking to avoid the issue of backing a zionist regime who steals other people's things. You are only talking to avoid having to face the fact that the candidates you approve of advocate the theft of YOU and the world, and the murder of innocent people.

So, what do really think of the wholesale slaughter of human beings based out outright lies? It's ok to have an opinion about this; no one is going to fault you for that . . . except perhaps yourself.

You appear to be uninformed when it comes to what has happened to the dollar, and why it has happened, and how the destruction of other peoples' countries are necessary to hide the truth of the reason for the demise of the dollar. You need to research that! Just google Petro dollars. That would be an excellent start.

Why do you bend over so easily and then not straighten your stand even when someone informs of the thing in your rear? Why do you support those who support the hand that's illegally in your pocket? Do you think that's practical? I know I don't.

You're waiting for Jesus to run for office, aren't you? Do you think that's realistic?

Let's start with the preservation of human life as a priority, unless you have an objection to that . . .

 

LOL

You're a dictator's dream come true. They love it when you adopt terms like right-wing, left wing, liberal, consevative, moderate left, moderate right, etc. etc. and etc. It's the old tried and true "divide and conquer" trap. You're all too busy labeling each other to notice what's being done to you; not to mention what's being done to other people in other countries. Think about it--your first priority is not human life. How can that be?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUHmxBEZeU0"]The Petrodollar Explained - YouTube

Of course, the lying scumbags running for office know this, but they talk about boogey man things like Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions, just like they did with Iraq. They do that because they know exactly what will scare children and people who don't research things before talking.

There's a saying: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me--well, you know the rest.

There's a good book called: Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. It was written by John Perkins. He can fill you in as to how things really work. You won't regret it. It's very mind-changing. He served the people who people like you want in office.

 

kissy meATs!!!

hello people, i am new here . I am old, so this is my first attempt to use internets with my cumputer.

sorry for my bad grammar , my skull is ill. i am 63 years old.

i am a hippy, so what? I have no problem with that. Filth is what brings us down. Greed and filth.

Why has human mankind became such hateful???

I believe in Osho and his wisdom.

would love to exchange with you . bIGG stiff meATs against hate and filth.

love and meAT!!!

 

Thank you, Storch ... I'm just checking in to the forum after a few days; looks like WE1 can't answer my questions, huh?! Didn't think so! I am in complete agreement with you - I think the whole country is riddled with shills; we gotta figure out how to counteract them.

I've caught up on this thread and read all of your posts, and I'd say we are on the same page. You've provided some excellent information - the video about the gentleman grilling that lady about the Federal Reserve investigation is tooo much - that lady is so lame; she can't answer even one of his questions. As well, the video about the Petro Dollar was extremely informative; thank you for posting both of those videos.

I don't need to tell you how sensible a candidate Ron Paul is -he is the only choice for President. It truly escapes me how anyone who has even just an average comprehension of the English language, would
weigh the pros & cons of each candidate and choose anyone but Ron Paul. It's a simple equation: all of the candidates other than Ron have no pros! None whatsoever; truly! And the weak things that the anti-Ron Paul people say - enough Ron Paul supporters within this thread have stated clearly, why Ron is our only choice - we haven't been vague about the criteria he follows at all!

I predict Ron will withdraw from running as a Republican and run as a third party independent - our task is to determine how we can counteract the cheating that will go on in the election; by the Powers That Be. There has to be a method we can establish to make certain that all of Ron's votes are actually tallied for him. Any suggestions, Storch?

 

Iode - I just now read this post you submitted - where on earth do you get
the notion that Ron Paul "doesn't know what Constitutional means"??
And your follow-up statement, in the form of a conclusion, "He thinks it means, 'I agree with.'" WTF??!! That is just plain inaccurate, Iode! Yikes! It's pretty clear that you have not checked in to listening to anything Ron has said about his platform, and the particulars he has covered regarding upholding the Constitution.

Kindly expound on those two claims you made, please - "Luuucy, you've got some 'splainin' to doo!" As well, I'm dying to hear your reasons as to why
he's the "worst possible candidate"; as you say. Now, then, Iode - after you give your reasons for why you think he is the "worst possible candidate", it follows that you also must indicate why what the others will do for the betterment of our country, make them better candidates. (I'm gonna go easy on you with this - since they're all the same, you only have to give one all-purpose group of reasons as to why one of the others will be the better candidate. Since they will all be just picking up where Obama left off, if he isn't elected, we all know that they will continue driving the car down into the ravine for the ultimate crash 'n burn - but I just want to hear what you say.)

And, please - provide a list of criteria for us, regarding why Ron Paul will not be good for our country - please refrain from your repeated catch-all descriptor of calling Ron a "Paleoconservative" - but actually, while you're at it, please provide the necessary criteria to constitute being a "Paleoconservative." Now, git to writin'!

One Of The Difference
_______________________________________________________

"I am convinced the best formula for preserving the American way of life and giving us all peace, is Freedom, Limited Government, & Minding our own business overseas." .... Ron Paul

"We dare not forget that we are the heirs of that first revolution."
.... John F. Kennedy
_______________________________________________________

 

For starters, laissez faire capitalism and a complete destruction of all public assistance programs, research grants, safety regulations and such isn't a good thing.

Nor is letting every state do whatever the fuck they want. There's a reason "state's rights" is 95% of the time used in a bad connotation, because states have a huge degree of autonomy as it is, and if they're doing something good, it's normally never a problem, in fact it's never a problem outside of marijuana. State's rights only gets bought up when the local population or state assembly wants to do something terrible and more rational people like judges are forced to stop them. Case in point, Ron Paul gots some serious beef with Lawrence v Texas, yes, states should just have every right to bring back sodomy laws and any other laws regarding sexual behavior.

 

Not in a million years- - but people that shouldnt stop people to vote for him, just voting for a RonPaul sends a big message

 

The Federal Government was designed to enforce state laws and to make sure the state laws don't violate constitutional rights. It was never meant to enforce laws on a national level outside of the constitution. It is in face ILLEGAL to do so under the Tenth Ammentment listed in Bill of Rights. Paul is the only candidate that believes that the government is NOT above the law and should be held accountable for its actions.

Let's look at abortion, gay marraige, and this whole mandatory coverage of controceptives debate. As well as legality of Cannabis. The government has no legal right to regulate any of these things on a national level. Aside from being unconstitutional, how would it be a good idea to control these controversial subjects on a national level, as opposed to letting the States decide?

There's also a huge contradiction in your statement which I assume is a typo. You said states rights is never a problem outside of Cannabis, at the same time saying its always bad.

 

oops

 

I agree this is probably gonna happen- -