Would you approve of your child marrying outside of their race?

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

:iagree:

that being said, if my children chose the societally acceptable institution of marriage, i wouldn't give a shit who to.

in fact, i would probably be the one going "why do you have to be straight, and getting married, and to a white person???"

lol.

 

this thread is way too long and i can't imagine that anyone on this site would have the balls to admit if they didn't approve, so i won't bother reading it.

i'd be very surprised if it happened to me, because i can't imagine myself knocking anybody up. but if i ever do adopt a kid, it'll be a little black athlete anyway, so i would expect him to marry a fat white girl.

 

only if she was attractive.

 

Living in IN, that really doesn't surprise me.

Most of the people here are super racist, and the ones who claim they aren't usually are... making racist jokes, remarks and etc. followed by "I'm not racist or anything..."

My parents pushed the issue not to date black guys or Hispanic guys... specifically Mexican, Hispanic... but they are not racist.

 

8% is inter race marriage in USA

 

I would want my child to marry someone outside their race in order to breed out selfish and imperialistic white person's DNA.

 

i would have a problem with it because i am a racist

 

My children are going to be half asian therefore 50% more likely to go University and become doctors or engineers.

 

14/88 :cheers2:


(if anyone knows what that means im not serious )

 

i know the 88, but the 14/ is new to me
:cheers2:

 

my children will have to marry an albino. white skin, white hair, pink eyes. super racist.

 

that's like so awesome, you're an inspiration

 

Of couse I would! What the fuck..

 

the main thing that would concern me about it is that caucasions make up less of the earth's population than any other race does. i could never hold such a thing against the children of such unions though. every branch of the human race's genetics are unique, once gone it is gone forevor. if white people were an animal that walked on all fours they'd class us as an endangered species.

 

Yes, its a bit of an odd question. I am almost color blind.

 

not all albinos are white people.

 

What is a "race"?
A human “race” is defined most often as a group of people with certain features in common that distinguish them from other groups of people. Currently there are three or four major “races” of humans, as the word race is commonly defined: (a) Australoid; (b) Caucasoid; (c) Mongoloid; and (d) Negroid. Generally speaking, the Australoids are considered a subgroup of the Caucasoids, simply because the two groups have so many features in common, despite the fact that Australoids possess dark skin (the Australoid group is often known as the Australian Aboriginal Group). If a breakdown by percentages of the world’s population were attempted, the groups would look like this: Caucasoid, 55%; Mongoloid, 33%; Negroid, 8%; Australoid, 4%. It is interesting to note that these races are distributed around the globe throughout over 100 nations, and speak 3,000+ tribal languages and dialects.

 

check out my above post..you are slightly incorrect

 

their languages, dialects and distribution are irrelevent to their dna or cranial shape. they can do a forensic examination of a corpse and determine what race he or her was while alive. the bottom line is white people worldwide make up less of the world's total population than anybody else does. they've even been talking about this very subject matter on the news as of lately. the idea that race is just merely a social barrier is the product of liberal minds. i don't think any one race is inherently superior to the others. but you'd be blind not to recognise the genetic unqiueness of each one. but, i am also aware of the vigour some hybridization can provide. but here's an artiocle about this taking place in america. http://www.industryweek.com/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=17082 it's happening in other parts of the world too.