Why do Muslim women only go left?

Nah....I'll be 65 next week. You can check my profile. Still funny, though. I do feel a bit like an antique, though.

Now then....I knew an old sub jockey and communicator who actually heard the broadcast. In the last years of his life when I knew him, he was still cussing and grousing about how "....that lying sonofabitch said we'd only have to pay for two years!!." His words, not mine. He was pretty young when he was listening to those broadcasts, but I believe he heard them himself, and there is ample evidence that a lot of others heard it, too, or the government wouldn't have bothered to broadcast it.

 

It appears that storm mountain doesn't understand the basics of economics any more than he does the US Constitution.

Necessary and proper does not mean "any damn thing I want, whether it's necessary OR proper"

There is no such thing as "free income". It came from somewhere or someone. Someone had to pay for it, and a well known fact is that government has no power to give anyone anything unless it takes it first from someone else who either created that wealth or otherwise earned it. "Free income" is not free.

In addition, social security is not a government benefit or entitlement. I paid into that fund for decades. It's MINE. I earned it, and I am entitled to withdraw on it, and no amount of government lying is going to change that fact. Wanna' know something fun? The Amish people in this country never pay into social security. Not at all. Not one thin penny. And they can do so legally because their religion forbids them from depending on government and it's programs to take care of their elderly. They take care of their own, including the elderly and the infirm. And they do a better job of it, too. They do pay income taxes, however, just like everyone else.

 

It's like games of thrones with tanks and mustard gas
I personally dig pre industrial warfare a lot more. But as a young teen WW2 was my favorite history period, partly because it was the last war in my neck of the woods.

 

I know lots of people in Canada and have been there over a hundred times. I know Canadian Law. Here in America we pay into Social Security, and we pay 15% when self employed, as I was. My earlier comment about FREE INCOME was concerning the monthly check people get when living under the Old Age Pension in Canada or Social Security benefits in America. The payments are monthly and you are not required to work for it during the present month. What you make of that is your business.

 

I noticed in your world Muslims were not enslaved by white supremacists.

 

So you are pushing Trump and Republican views concerning taxation. Here in America we like our Social Security. I paid into the Social Security system longer than most people on HF have been alive. I like my benefits.

 

Sounds like the KKK recruitment call. Any politician will tell you if they run on repeal of taxes and Social Security and Medicare they will lose. That's what happened in Kentucky. The Republicans cut the benefits and people voted for Democrats. Virginia turned Democrat for the same reason. The majority of Americans on social security and welfare are white. Veterans also collect lots of government benefits. In 242 days we'll vote again. The result will be just like what happened in 2018, and in Kentucky, and Virginia. I think 2021 will be a good year to restructure the Second Amendment, maybe to repeal it completely. I say that because Congress can regulate gun ownership through taxes, because the ATF is under treasury. Congress could also use its powers under the Commerce Clause to pass more strict regulations concerning sporting goods during transport. Finally, you should have noticed by now there are Muslim Women in Congress (also see the title of this thread) and these Muslim women would certainly like to see your gun rights restricted some more. I already wrote to them and asked for new gun laws and higher taxes.

 

So why would you think you can come here and get free money that is not available to you? Our Canada pension is for Canadians who contributed, not you.

 

I am happy you like your social security, so why would you think you can come here and collect Canadians social security? You seem fixated on money and how you can try to steal it from others.

 

I didn't say I wanted to do that. You often miss-read and miss-understand what I say. For your information -as I already said- I can take my American Social Security with me to most countries, including Canada. America's government will not allow you to receive Social Security monthly payments in only FOUR countries. I can't remember them all but I think it included North Korea and Iran, and maybe Cuba? I not quiet sure at this moment. But I know I could take my benefits with me when I go to Canada. I am also allowed to go to Canadian hospitals (close to the US border) if I need to and my Medicare insurance would pay for it. I have a friend living in Costa Rica and collecting monthly Social Security money. I think Costa Rica will give a three year visa to Americans who have Social Security income. You need to have a fresh look at non-right wing political views, because Democrat political thinking is so much more advanced than its Republican counter part.

 

I think she was merely doubting the certainty of the amount that was claimed. It's not like they were primarily enslaved because they were muslim.

 

?

 

And I'm doubting the certainty of her/his assumption that I want to collect or steal Canadian money. I already have American Social Security. I paid into the system here in this country longer than most Hipforums posters have been alive.

 

Which is why i agree with the assertion its not really free. It's built up and if it wouldn't be people are not entitled to it. Hence why I find the assertion 'no one is entitled to free money' in our western societies not an extreme or extremist statement either. Just to be clear: I am for experiments with basic income, and also am for free income for old retired people. But I don't find it extreme if other people find no one is entitled to it without doing anything in return for it.

 

This thread is about Muslim women and Left Turns. It has exposed a subliminal truth in Canadian society. I can see in Canada Muslim women would turn LEFT so they could avoid discrimination. When a Muslim woman lives and works in Canada, racist Canadians make up false accusations about them and attempt to deny them public benefits and government entitlements.

 

What you say makes perfect sense and I have made the same argument to local Republicans here in Indiana. People do pay into the system during a lifetime of work, then are entitled to collect monthly benefits. Our Congress calls the monthly benefits Entitlements. The Republican Party wants to end these entitlements. When I describe the monthly entitlements as FREE INCOME, it is because the benefit is free at the time you get it. Additionally the Republicans argue that at some point your payments into the system run out and then you are collecting Free Income. I can understand that too, but think it is a necessary facet of the system. Some beneficiary might die before collecting a single dollar. Married people in America get only one check, if a spouse has died. In that scenario, both workers ( husband and wife) have paid into the system and only one collects. I have known old divorced women who collected a small minimum benefit, because they spent years raising children. That seemed unfair to me, because raising children is in all reality … work. Since this thread is about Muslim women, I'll say that I write to Our Muslim members of Congress so they can strengthen government benefits for Muslim women.

 

It's primarily a bait thread to annoy and trigger leftists into making stupid replies.

I'm sure that happens to some extent in most western countries. Happily both Canada and a lot of other countries have solid anti discrimination policies. It's not intrinsic in the canadian society methinks

 

I think it is intrinsic in many societies. Most nations will not let new-comers to collect monthly benefits. Try collecting benefits in Saudi Arabia. They will not even let the locals have benefits, if from the wrong tribe. In some cases they give lesser benefits to Shia than to Sunna. I think about ten years ago Canadian law required an immigrant from America to use America benefits or to sustain themselves for five years before applying for benefits from Canada.

 

Yes, not granting such benefits to most newcomers may be intrinsic. That's understandable. I mean canadians not wanting muslim immigrants to have public benefits because of that exact background is not an intrinsic part of canadian society.

 

There is slavery and oppression in Israel where Muslim women have to turn left, because they have no rights.