What's the WORST film of all time?

tHE hULK

 

Any movie by Uwe Boll, House of the Dead, Van Helsing, Alone in the Dark. All garbage. You Got Served wasnt the worst, it was just plain ridiculous. The Village sucked ass and that awful steamy loaf of gorilla shit from Australia Undead.

 

Red Dawn was great it shows what a bunch of armed citizens could to to a rogue invading army if they try that shit here in the USA.

 

The Texas Waco stand off tv film not only was it full of lies but pathetic. and making Janet Reno and the A.T.F thugs look like they are the good guys i might include Clinton and Hillary since they all had the bloody hands in it.

 

OF COURSE you well never see a movie about Randy weaver family being murder by the FBI AND ATF AGENTS . He got a couple of millions after he sue the goverment "chomp money in today standards after they kill his wife holding a newborn and his 14 year old son and best friend and the family dogs.

 

Sadly, Wetbikerider, the people that govern us show us a one sided coin. As long as there's folks like you around, we can see both sides.

BTW. I think Mr & Mrs Smith was already mentioned, but just in case, if you need something to fall asleep to, this does the trick. Toilet.

 

I agree completely....eternal sunshine of the spotless mind is an excellent movie!

 

I'm sorry but I've never been so bored in all my life. Two people bobbing up and down in water and arguing does not appeal to me. And the ending was quick and pointless.
But that's just my humble opinion!

 

Brighton Beach Memoirs..

 

Manos, the hands of fate.

HANDS DOWN.

It is excruciatingly bad.

 

Dracula 3000. Dracula looks like a bad Haloween costume. Oh my god that movie is so bad.

 

I will put that movie up against Manos the Hands of Fate any day.

 

I don't know how Manos could be worse that Dracula 3000, but it's possible. I guess I have to see it now.

 

Did you see the extensive article on "Manos" in Entertainment Weekly a couple of months ago? Highly entertaining.

 

No! I didn't.

RE: I don't know how Manos could be worse that Dracula 3000

Was Dracula 3000 shot on a Bell and Howell camera that was actually on a mechanical spring, needed winding, and could only take 20 seconds worth of shot at a time, leading to some EXCRUCIATING editing, including entire sequences of driving with no dialogue?

Was every line dubbed cause said camera had no sound quality?

Does the lead villain look like Frank Zappa in whiteface?

Does the plot make no sense?

Is the henchman a stoned-out LSD soaked kid playing a Satyr who ended up dying six months later?

MANOS HANDS DOWN

 

Don't take my word for it

http://www.i-mockery.com/minimocks/manos/default.php

Strangely enough ---- it's one of Quentin Tarentino's fave movies and he has one of the very few copies in existence.

 

Armageddon, Deep Blue Sea

 

The Apple

 

it figures..."manos" and "mitchell" were the only MST3000 movies i ever liked. My exgirlfriend told me "manos is so bad that you are the only one in the world who could appreciate it in any way" and she was right LOL

 

Did anyone see 'The Island' ?
I'm not going to give anything away that's not already advertised.

Whilst it wasn't the worst film I've ever seen, after all the story line was interesting, the action was gripping and the special effects were the usual eye fest that we've become accustomed to over the last years,

yet there was one thing that intrigued me and I was wondering if anyone else out there on planet earth has the same cloud of doubt...

The characters in this super duper sci-fi movie were living in the future, surrounded by technology that can create all sorts of genetic wonders out of DNA.

They drove around in flying motorvehicles, floating trains. They had gigantic holograms and blah, blah, blah... Well then, why is it that the doctor was wearing glasses?!? We even have the laser technology in the world we live today to rectify retina problems! I mean, come on!!! Talk about stereotyping the doctor in spectacles so that he can look more intelligent!

"Yeah, the audience will not understand that he's a doctor, unless he wears glasses, but he can't be bald too because he's one of the lead roles and the movie's aimed at a young adult audience."

And then, as is usual with these futuristic scenario palava, it was besmirched with a non-stop barrage of commercials, from Cadillac, to train companies, phone companies, dear old MSN. Take out the adverts and the film reaches just about 10 minutes.

I demand that the producers put up some form of apology in this forum. I can forgive all the blatant marketing tricks, but the glasses have severely damaged all my hopes and aspirations for the furure of mankind. The scar will stay with me for a very long time.

10/4