This is ridiculous. You've constantly avoided answering pretty much every question I've put to you and then lied about having answered it. Stop lying, liar. I asked you earlier why it is bad to use religion as a shelter, and your response amounted to "OMG ARE U SERIOUS LOLOLOLOLOLOL IT IS BAD BECAUSE IT IS BAD LOLOLOLOOL u r delusional!!!!!!" which is a total non-answer. If you "welcome a relevant acceptable question" from me, you certainly don't feel obligated to respond with a relevant acceptable answer.
You're lying. I explained exactly how you failed to answer my question, as thoroughly as possible, and then offered you the opportunity to continue the debate as if you had said what you lied about having said, and you did not take that opportunity. I give you the opportunity now again: explain to me how religion only provides the illusion of shelter, rather than actual shelter, from reality.
This is absurd. If you have an answer, why not just say it again? Would that pain you so much? Just imagine, you could really rub my nose in it! Clearly I'm not going to admit defeat while you continue to refer me back to that post. You've probably wasted just as many keystrokes telling me that you have answered my question as you would have if you had simply restated what you claim you said, so why not do it now, eh? If I'm so far beneath you, why not nip me in the bud? And yet you continue to respond to my posts.
Because your symptoms of depression, confusion, delusion and irrationality caused by the christian mind virus, entertains me greatly.
No, it's just the truth, and I would ask that you post on topic, ideally answering the question that I have asked you, rather than posting further generic and interchangeable non sequiturs.
Lamo! There you go again, dodging the question. You don't want to tell us because they're so dumb people might laugh!
It doesn't seem like an inappropriate question for someone to ask in a forum about religion, after having their beliefs derided by someone. I don't see how someone who has ridiculed the beliefs of others could really justify not revealing their own.
As I recall, it was pretty much the U.S. Army recruiting slogan: "Be all that you can be." Is there more to it than that?
I'd repressed it, but it's coming back: "I do, however, believe in the human spirit that controls an individual's actions that reside in each of us. The 'God' (for lack of a better term) that is in me is different than the God that dwelss(sic) in you." "My human spirit is a desire to be the best person I can be. It is a force that drives me. A motivation to succeed." FedUpAmerican. Correct? I apologize. It's less altruistic than the U.S. Army slogan. So your God is your own personal ambition?
Why do you believe in this "human spirit" that resides within all of us? It seems like a pretty stupid thing to believe in. Have you been checked out for mindviruses lately?
That's why I used the plural "mindviruses". You should get yourself checked out for other, non-Christian mindviruses. You might have a Hindu or an atheist mindvirus.
I have never been a Christian, yet you have diagnosed me with the Christian mind virus. Clearly, mindviruses are communicable among the non-communicate (Holy shit, I made a pun!). Unless of course you admit that your diagnosis is off.
But posting essentially the same thing with arbitrary variations is totally okay? Figures. You're abusing your position as moderator and you should be ashamed of yourself. Find another playmate.