Was Michael Jackson a Child Molester?

Despite the fact that I am not the subject of this thread, I will answer your "wonder".

1. I am very disturbed by the fact that fame and fortune blind people to the crimes committed by the wealthy and powerful.

2. By choosing to believe that Michael Jackson was some kind of Peter Pan, who "loved children" and not a child molester, people enable other child molesters to continue their crimes without reporting them.

3. By forcing all those around him to sign "non-disclosure" confidentiality agreements, Michael Jackson was able to continue abusing children for years and nobody would risk the financial damage of coming forward to testify against him.

4. Michael Jackson is a classic pederast, meeting nearly all the criteria and then some! Just because nobody has been able to prove it in a court of law (thanks to good lawyers, tons of money and confidentiality agreements), doesn't mean it didn't happen.

5. All the other weird shit regarding his children indicates that:
A. He did not father any of those kids
B. He lied about fathering those kids (and many other things)
C. He likely abused one or more of them.
D. He bought those children so he wouldn't have the situation he did with the boy who testified against him.

6. As long as people are so ignorant about MJ and child abuse, I will endeavor to shed more light on his real nature, for the benefit of other children who are being abused today, while those around them turn a blind eye to it.

7. With the recent revelations about Sandusky at Penn State and Fine at Syracuse U, it's all too apparent this type of thing is far more common than most people think, and again those around these abusers enabled them to continue abuse by COVERING UP THE ABUSE.

8. And that is the worst thing in my eyes, far worse than what MJ did, is the coverup by "respectable" people due to potential breach of confidentiality agreements, and the financial penalties that would ensue...

9. And lastly I do have far more important things to do, thanks for reminding me...

 

When police arrest child molesters they always find kiddie porn, it seems. So there's evidence of a crime right there.

The fact that they didn't find such at Michael Jackson's house is a good sign for him. Although it could've been destroyed b4 police got there. And since they weren't there to investigate him as a child molester (after his death) they probably didn't secure his computer(s) or other personal effects.

However they did find photographs of children in their underwear, and I posted up a pic of Jacko and Macaulay Kulkin earlier in this thread. So I'd say it's inconclusive but certainly indicative of someone who gets their kicks from kids in underwear, and likely worse.