The one thing I can say for sure, is that nobody can know for sure if he actually molested children or not. In my own personal opinion, I don't think he did, no. I believe he could maybe have done things that would be deemed "inappropriate" by many, but I don't think any actual sexual act took place between him and any children. We also live in a time where a lot of people are being falsely accused of being peadophiles. But children who make that accusation will almost always be believed, which makes it very difficult on the person who has been accused if the allegation was made up.
he was a baby fucker. no if, and, or, but about it. over the years of his acts, the district attorney, police, grand jury, child protective services and, fbi had been compling more and more hardcore evidence of his crimes aganist childern. two things kept him from ever being charged and brought to trial, his celebrty and his money. he bled himself dry of money from covering his ass. if jackson were insane that would have ment he would have gotten treatment and, not been held accountable for his actions; however, the guy did know the difference from right and wrong. he was a psycopath... he pray upon the weak for his own ends. he was nothing but a wolf in sheep clothing.
Michael wasnt a child molester in my eyes, there was no proof. The media destroyed his reputation with false allegations.
Exactly. In all of the things Ive read and seen about this, I've yet to see a shred of concrete evidence that suggests he was a child molester.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36sKMwbwfWc"]"He Made Thriller, Thriller." - YouTube Couldn't have said it better myself
Exactly. Just because he was famous with millions of fans, he gets a pass. It's OK to fondle little boys cause he's famous! He was a FIFTY YEAR OLD MAN. Not a child. He never had sex with a woman. You want to prove Michael Jackson wasn't a child molester? Then prove to us who he had sex with. Just one woman or man will do... WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? Otherwise you have no basis on which to defend him. Whereas, we know for a FACT, and Jacko admitted himself he slept with at least a dozen children, multiple times, with no other adults around. So what more proof does anyone need to provide?
Who was falsely accused? Name names or withdraw this statement. So far as we know hundreds of priests have been named and that's just in the Catholic church. Has even one of them been falsely accused? Most claim they are being falsely accused, at first. But then when the facts come out some actually admit it, others are found guilty no matter what they profess. Do you really think people make these accusations lightly and without proof? Anyone attempting that would know (their lawyer would tell them), that a false accusation could result in a slander lawsuit. And since so many accused pedos are rich and famous they can get good lawyers. No Michael Jackson is the most famous PEDO DENIER. And it is his LEGION OF FANS that think he's infallible that have kept the truth about MJ from being universally known and accepted. Now this is important, imo. What kind of deviant sexual behavior actually occurred between MJ and those children he slept with or played with, with no supervision? Did he just touch their privates? Did they touch his? Did oral sex occur? Did anal sex occur? Did MJ force himself on any kids? Did he provide them alcohol or drugs? These are the real questions everyone should be asking to get to the bottom of this... (no pun intended) Of course we will never know unless one of his victims comes forward. I'll bet with the new openness about this subject and the increasing willingness of victims to finally admit what happened, someone will come forward and probably sue the Jackson estate over molestation charges yet again. I have no proof, but my guess is MJ did whatever he could get away with. It would probably depend upon the willingness of the kid. There was a report that Jackson had given alcohol to some kid or kids, possibly other drugs. Whatever he did or didn't do, one thing I give MJ credit for. I doubt he would physically harm anyone. So I doubt he raped a kid. More likely just fondling. And then my question to all of you is, is that worse than murdering a child? If not, then why do you all attach such a stigma to it? It's that stigma that prevents you from admitting the truth about Michael Jackson. You don't want to see him as something worse than a murderer. He's your hero after all!
I already typed out a bunch of facts that would show why Michael Jackson isn't a pedophile in another thread. Don't really feel like revisiting the topic again, but just putting it out there that he's not. I'm not a fanboy, either.
The closest any man or woman came to riding anything of michael jacksons,,,,is a kiddie ride,,,,,,,gooo figure
I liked MJ. I grew up listening to him, and his brothers. I have no idea if he ever did anything wrong with anybody. But for some reason, those pics wyldwynd just posted creep the hell out of me. I just get a bad feeling looking at them for some reason. Just saying.
No. They were investigating him for almost 2 decades and found nothing to prove it and it's not like he's the incognito type... if he did do anything something would have been found. Also, what kind of parent would accept money to not go ahead with the trial if MJ really did molest the first accusation? Why is it that only the poor ever accused him? What about Macaulay Culkin? Seems a bit suspicious to me.
Orison you are without doubt one of the most splendidly perverse human beings on Earth. (You are human aren't you?) Regardless that trolley will never sit on its tracks quite the same again. You may very well be a national Treasure. Thanks for sharing.
Debbie rowe came forward a couple years ago and said she was artificially inseminated by an anonymous donor and michael jackson is not the biological father of the two she carried.
If that's true, perhaps Michael was incapable at that point? We have to realize this is a guy with some messed up diseases (vitiligo and something else I can't remember) and who was also on a bunch of painkillers. His body was a wreck. Imagine how embarrassing it'd be for him, with the image that the media already spun up of him, for him to come out and say he's infertile. The fact that he wants his own children and can't have them, well then I definitely see why he went the route he went. I think that'd be the only explanation possible. Michael's hit on women, made out with them (videos of it, too) and (of course) specifically addressed them in songs, so he obviously didn't have a disgust for them. EDIT: The former lover of one of Jackson's former doctors claims that Michael was booted really hard in the groin by his father and never recovered. He was unable to produce any sperm to have children. Of course, it seems like the whole world needs to know this stuff. Make of it what you will. I think there's more important things to worry about than how Michael's children were made. He was a loving father.