War With Syria

Then just stop responding about that. Obviously the conversation between you two on that isn't going to be resolved...will just go back and forth- back and forth- you explaining, him calling you a liar...
No change. So just drop it.

 

I'll repeat= if Israel is attacked--seriously attacked---some country will be obliterated.

Stp--are you sure Russia threatened to attack Saudi Arabia?

 

Who do you think would be obliterated? Syria? Iran? Who???

 

And I think you're understanding of this situation is childish. Do you honestly think Russia is willing to wage nuclear war over Syria? I refuse to believe even you are that naive.

Iran has a 3rd rate military and, quite honestly, can't hope to defeat the United States in a military confrontation. The vast majority of their equipment is totally outdated and not serviceable and what "modern" equipment they do have is still decades behind that of the United States and our allies.

 

And yet you are lying about it for some reason.....

 

I read it on the EUTimes

http://www.eutimes.net/2013/08/puti...e-against-saudi-arabia-if-west-attacks-syria/

 

Like I said, believe whatever you want.

 

AT= Not Israel. Remember the NEVER AGAIN slogan they have stated. If they are seriously attacked--not just a few rockets here and there= the BIG ONES will fly! JMO.

And just imagine the FURY--if gas is used!! Again.

 

Seriously? The EU Times? You know that isn't any where near a legitimate new source, right Stp? Hell, they don't even link to the memorandum they claim supports their story. There are zero facts in their article.

 

Yeah, the whole thing is a really bad idea. I wish they just wouldn't do it. (the U.S.)...

ww3... like I said...

 

Even if we do attack it isn't going to be WW3. Russia and Iran have zero to gain by getting militarily involved.

 

Well, I think you're wrong. You need to look at the stratigic placement of troops in Aussie and Asia. This contributes to their discomfort. But not only is Syria/Assad their close oil trader, it also has a pipeline to Russia, that would lose money during war. (due to oils flamablity) I think you just believe the mainstream media. I Mean 9% of people support intervention, and of course you're one of them. I don't even believe Assad "gassed" his people!

I didn't say they'd defeat us, but it wouldn't be like Iraq either. It would be full-on like Vietnam shit. I think you're the Nieve one to think America can do whatever it wants in the world with no reprecussions!

 

I used to think coast guard an exemplary service as perimeter security/safety. It should be noted that the ideas security and safety may be in conflagration. We are safe having good situational command not good defensive abilities. Someone bigger or younger always comes along.

 

I have said, numerous times, I do not think we should attack Syria. I also don't think Russia is as stupid as you think they are.

I never said there would be no repercussions. I just think they would be limited because Iran simply isn't as powerful as you would like the believe. "full on like Vietnam shit"? Do you even read what you're posting? Why the hell would we invade Iran?

 

Read closely...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...Russia-secret-oil-deal-if-it-drops-Syria.html

As-Safir said Prince Bandar pledged to safeguard Russia’s naval base in Syria if the Assad regime is toppled, but he also hinted at Chechen terrorist attacks on Russia’s Winter Olympics in Sochi if there is no accord. “I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us,” he allegedly said.

The Putin-Bandar meeting was stormy, replete with warnings of a “dramatic turn” in Syria. Mr Putin was unmoved by the Saudi offer, though western pressure has escalated since then. “Our stance on Assad will never change. We believe that the Syrian regime is the best speaker on behalf of the Syrian people, and not those liver eaters,” he said, referring to footage showing a Jihadist rebel eating the heart and liver of a Syrian soldier.

 

Nothing to support your claim that Russia pledged to attack Saudi Arabia if Syria is attacked.

 

Actually, I found a news source you "wouldn't believe" maybe you should try not believing the Murdoch/Turner information industry, you might awake from your Matrix

 

And okay maybe that was an illegitimate source. It doesn't change the fact America is literally supporting terrorist in the name of upholding this Military-industrial complex, and you ignore that point completely.


Maybe you're an investment banker?

 

So this is how you respond when someone asks you to back up a claim with a source? It isn't my fault you made a claim based on a story that had no supporting basis in fact. How dare anyone question you, right? Anyone who does must be in on the conspiracy?

 

It's not a conspiracy. It's a really obvious money transfer machine to the government, and pointless wars that make people hate us, and cause more terrorism against that. You don't have to believe me. But it's obvious we're victims of an overblown government.