im pro choice because i think the government cant have control over a womans body..but personaly i would be pro life just because i would never get one ...but i agree with freedom
Well, I think abortions are a woman's right. I had an abortion when I was 16. I wasn't ready for a child and neither was my boyfriend. We still aren't. And we're still together. It was a tramatic expirencely and people who shun women for having abortions..they really don't realize how insanely hard it is. And I'm sure they say.."Well, if it's so hard..why did you do it?" I was 16. My boyfriend was 19. We had no place to live. And we didn't really want anyone to know that I was pregnant. We decided it would save both of our asses. And our relationship. I didn't even think of the option of giving the child up for adoption because I knew it would screw up my life even that way. I would miss days of school for doctors appointments and even for the birth itself. The baby was a mistake. An accident. I thought I did something that was right for me. I know there are alot of women out there who do abuse their power to abort their child. Women who sleep around and "accidentally" get pregnant by every Tom, Dick, and Harry. It's their choice though. And American was founded based upon choice. Why not live up to it's name? The Land of Freedom. *shrugs* That's just my opinion.
Were is the compasion for humans people. Dont you appreciate getting to experinece life? So how dare you take life from something else. And yes Im a vegetarian too.
Try learning a bit about the topic at hand before you run your mouth, please. Babies are almost always adopted, no matter what color they are. The majority of children who are in foster care or state custody don't end up there as babies, they usually get placed there at a much later age. The "state" usually tries to keep those children from being adopted, thinking it's somehow in the child's best interest to let them float while their birth parents try to staighten out whatever problems they have (financial, addiction, abuse and so on.) It is not a matter of people being unwilling to adopt children, the problem is with the way our system is set up. That is why you have so many amerikan couples adopting children from foreign countries like asia right now.
Having brought up three kids mostly alone, I can tell you its no easy thing being a Mum,single or married. Being a parent is hard work & should be recognised & valued. However,I'm strongly in favour of abortion,I believe we need to have this right available to women.There will always be some who,for whatever reason will need it,& its vastly preferable to the previous situation,where women had back street abortions.Often this resulted in sterility or death. I believe that no woman should be forced to bear a child she does not want;I also believe that no woman should be forced to have an abortion she does not want. For those who put forward the adoption option - I've known several women who did this...none of them are without scars.Except in rare circumstances,adoption can be a bad decision.These days we have the open adoption,which does seem slightly better,but I have known it to also go wrong.
Thats amazing, I could never take potential life from somone. I boycott eggs until I found out they went fertalized yet.
It is not a pefect world. In a perfect (or close to it) world, each and every child would be cared for the same, with the same respect, dignity, and financial chances. But it is so untrue, in fact, that, many a would-be mother-to-be decides to stop the pregnancy to save HER OWN chances of a better future. And that is what pro-choicers recognize when saying it IS her body, and if she decides to terminate the life growing inside (and off of) her, that is her's to do it with. It is HER caloric intake causing this life to continue, and it is not as though the pregnancy is so mysterious that we do not know how they are caused nor how to terminate them. The perfect idealism of a woman was to go along with it all as though everything IS alright, when it is not. Women ARE getting tough these days, and there's good reason. When you break your leg, or have an accident, you go to a doctor for a cast or stitches. When you get pregnant and want to stop that, you go to a doctor and get an abortion. When LIFE becomes, by the will and effort of the people, better for both mom and baby so that abortion does not look more appealing than producing a young you do not want to sacrifice for, then aboriton statistic will go down. But you can't expect that because the woman is the bearer of the final outcome of the sex act that she should have NO CHOICE but to change the course of her entire life because of it. Rather, it would be more realistic to admit the powerful position she holds and not rock the boat on the subject. It's not a nice decision to have to make, to have an abortion, but I can see why so many do. Men appear to think they can just f--k ya and that's the end of their responsibility. So why should we take it upon ourselves to do any better, until there's a situation that makes it worth it? And if it IS this really great social republic issue, then make the people pay so that staying home alone with a child is more appealing and aboritons will stop! Otherwise, maybe people should stop and realize that early every spring thousands of baby animals freeze to death because it's still too cold. Is that, ah, something that people give a shit about? There's ALOT wrong with this current way people inhabit the earth. It simply pisses me off that women are pushed into the secondary position, away from the powers that rule, and then are expected to pick up the damage. I just don't see why we should continue to pull the weight. I certainly won't be having any more babies. Babies are for people who can afford them. Mine got taken away, reasons were scanty, but on a different set of circumstances, I would have aborted too. It's just that people fail to see the importance of mom and baby/child(ren) staying home and nurturing in early life, and of mom having the freedom to do so, no matter whether daddy books or not. Get it? Stayng home on welfare is better for the kids than having a working mom or a second income. But it is so respectless. Nobody appreciates that you sacrificed to bring up children instead of having a hoity-toity social life, (financial wealth and attributable social prowess), whether it includes a father in the home or not. I realize better organization could provide a better existence for moms that want to stay home, llike free-bies at neighborhood centers to attract these families together so that the moms can experience more adult interaction of their own, while still attending the kids. That's the worse part, you end up being a shut in, staying home all the time with the kids. Even though it's good for the kids, you have to broaden your horizons somewhere. You think you're doing the right thing for the children, and one day you wake up and realize your crazy from being around just them for too long. And workforce progams are not the answer. Raising families is all about choices. The government should be allowing more and better choices. What could be more important than the emotional stability and well-being of our future generations(s)? That's why so many women right now are now choosing to abort. Our state of familial production is at it's worse as it's been, probably since women got their freedom, let's just say it's gone severly down hill. And women can sense that. On top of that, pregnancy is an estremely sensitive condition, you sense 10 times stronger what just is. so, even though for some it may be a mistake, i9t's like a small war against capitalism and the disrespect it leaves people experienceing about money and prioities. And women are going to continue to abort until there are better choices made available to them, because we are simply too competant to scrifice and marry just for financial gain and family security. If you're not masrrying for love, then it is not a good environment to try to start a family in anyway. Times change, thank all those who've poineered, but women no longer have to sacrifice sufferage of fear of poverty in order to produce children. We can , even now, work a job and supply for ourselves and our children, some of us, (for many it is too stressful), or nowadays we can also choose to abort. It's better than being held as week or inferior, so that men can maintain their reign over us and our livelihoods. When men can change the attitude that we owe THEM somehow,that attitude that their god's gift, men and women could learn to get along alot better. There's not much difference between men and women except that the man does his fertile duty, and the women does her growth and bearing duty, but besides that, having a dick or a croch is about the only difference between men and women. i.e. women can think and live for themselves, and now that we've fought that in, it is NOT going to change, and it is suggested that men get used to that and learn to treat us like human beings and learn to trust themselves with us this way. After that, they'll be more competant to provide what's best, their guilt having been removed about it all. I honestly do think, that since men do NOT do as much as women in the area of childrearing, that they should have to be the ones to work and pay more taxes so that children can come up without women losing their dignity and being forced to have an adult attachment in her home that she doesn't want. Men and women both need education early, like high school, regarding better edicate. Respecting each have feelings, and pride, is a good start. Feelings can be hurt, each side knows that. And pride is something you earn. You don't force your way onto a person. You show the good things that you are, and, if someone chooses you that you'd like to, then that is pride well earned. And there you've built your trust too. Lot's of things need to change today. I've got to go now.