Upholding your corporate image

saying milk is bad is silly.

saying any food is "bad" isn't very smart either. it's just moderation.

and soymilk and all that is actually genetically motified a lot. very controversial studies. if anything almond milk is always good.

 

I'm saying that milk treated with bovine somatotropin (Posilac) is bad, and if you understood the source of this chemical, the results of the test that have been conducted on it..... and the way it was approved...,
you would understand.

If this doesn't tell you that something is wrong...

... then I don't know what else to tell you.

The FDA is controlled by the coorporation.
The coorporation's responsibility is to it's stockholders... at all cost,, they function to make money. No matter how it effects humans.

enough said .

 

fuck milk, seriously

 

Corporations don't have any sort of regard other then inflating stock prices. As soon as god made the third caveman a conspiracy was hatched against one of them.

'Ya seen conspiracy theory rock?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGEdDd5zsHo

The best thing you can do is try to get as much information as possible, and take it all with a couple buckets of salt. Every corporation in the west is in a constant effort to preserve the status quo, to keep you uninformed, and have you buy as much as possible.

You can find clairty though.

 

Not so fast

A thousand years ago when the vikings first introduced milk to native americans they got very sick and some nearly died. They assumed the vikings were trying to poison them, but in reality they were simply lactose intolerant.

hotwater

 

i read plenty. i read plenty from people who actually have backgrounds in nutrional science - who work with actual people getting them healthy - i read the actual studies they cover.

 

The reason rBGH is banned in several nations (not all others) is the fact that it has negative health effects on cows. (Mastitis, and decreased fertility) not that the milk is tainted.

Love'n your information is poorly researched.

 

So, you think it is healthy to drink milk from infected cows ?

 

Since none of the conditions mentioned were infections, the questions moot.

 

True true,, mastitis is commonly referred to as "udder infections" but there is very little if any pus caused by the inflamation of the mammalian gland.

Do you think it is safe for a chemical company to develop new drugs to put into our food sources, then send their own scientist to the FDA to approve them?

What part of Robert Cohen's testimony to the FDA do you believe is wrong?
http://www.ecoglobe.org/nz/news1999/d049news.htm

this part really bothered me,,

Are you familiar with Monsanto?

http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm

What do you think of this ?

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1525/is_3_84/ai_54492543

Now, if Monsanto has the power to have their own scientist and attorneys appointed to positions of authority at the FDA, what do you think their first responsibility is? Food safety, or "selling as much of it as possible".

It doesn't really matter what I say,,, or don't say for that matter.

 

Yes, I am familiar with Monsanto. I have a mixed opinion of them... obviously not fond of agent orange. I do however strongly support genetic modifications of crops, and further, I support patents for GMO's.

I don't mind having a discussion about this, but perhaps another thread would be a more appropriate venue.

 

lol ,,,

You can start a new thread about it if you want.

I've already been through this litigation with Monsanto representatives at my trial.

I assure you, my information is not poorly researched.

 

http://www.mindfully.org/GE/RBGH-Alarming-TestsJul95.htm

I couldn't help it.

 

If you drink milk contaminated with Posilac (rBST) .... these will start to grow in your brain.



OK , I quit !

 

Wtf???

 

This is about milk now?

Milk is gross, only for coffee

The best thing to do is not drink it, then it doesn't matter what the fuck they do to it