but that is irrelevant when considering the purpose of sex. Thank goodness it don't result in babies every time, or everyone would be homosexual....LOL
Why do you think i'm putting emotional baggage into it, because I used the word fuck? Anywho, I read what you said,I just don't agree. Anything that occurs in nature is natural. The purpose of sex is reproduction at its most basic level, but this still doesnt change the fact that homosexuality occurs in nature and is therefore natural.
It is interesting to note that in the animal kingdom, some will assume the position and act of looking like they are humping another, as this shows dominance. I see it all of the time with my pugs, who are all fixed here........even the females will do this at times to another...... Anyone tries it with me, is going to get kicked to the curb. I know the difference between love and sex and dominance. it is also interesting tonote, that Champy, the only pug that was not fixed after the puppies were born with Moxy...only ever tried to do this again with only Moxy.....who I had fixed after her first litter of puppies.....
Here's an article addressing that. However that in no way debunks the idea that a lot of people who come out gay were abused. http://www.fathersforlife.org/gay_issues/gay_gene.htm
No but it can mess people up. Other things abused would do is have no sexual boundaries, be depressed, PTSD, etc. that doesn't mean that all would experience it. So I think your argument is invalid. Just because a lot of people don't experience it doesn't mean that such feelings aren't prevalent in abuse victims. As a side not I find it interesting that just about everybody that disagree with me here can't do it without insulting or otherwise personally attack me. You may mock my morals but its beside the issue.
it's because your position and ideas are so absolutely ludicrous, outdated, proven to be utterly wrong and just plain ignorant as in devoid of actual REAL information on the topic that it renders what you say a joke. how or why should anyone take you seriously? I certainly don't.
Because someone wrote something on the internet it automatically becomes the truth? On a website run by heterosexuals who are scared shitless because they think being gay is infectious? Dude you need to seriously grow up. Also: read up on the reliability of statistics and how they actually work.
LOL. Comedy gold that one. The only one overdue a large number of "harsh life lessons" is yourself mate. There's no point reasoning with you. You don't WANT to be reasoned with. We've had all these arguments time and time again. But you and the other militants just ignore the facts, the research, the logic of it all. As for the rest of the World - do some research! America's "club" is just one small part of the World. And even in that bloc most people are against the faux liberalist militants. You seem to forget that in many countries homosexuality is illegal, banned from active promotion or openly frowned at. Only in places like America is criticism of it actually the subject of harrassment etc.
Ah, here we go, the root of your bigotry. Ignorance of the whole subject at hand and prejudging a whole category of ppl because of some false perceptions, which is called prejudice. You sound like that Christian bullshit of "love the sinner hate the sin." What are the activities of gay ppl you are against? Is it going to work, supporting their family, buying groceries, cooking, having dinner guests, taking out the trash, cleaning their home or bathing? Oh, it's buttfucking. You can't stand the thot of a man sticking his cock inside another man's poopchute. But that is not the only sexual activity gay men do and you do know that some heterosexual couples also do that same activity. Or are you against one woman munching another's carpet? But it is OK for a man to do that with a woman? Can you explain exactly what ACTIVITY of gay ppl you are against so we can discern the depths of you ill-informed ignorance? IDK if you are young, never went to school or only went to BuyBull School in the Deep South, but your premise of gays being the cause of STIs is an outdated false prejudice dating to the early 1980s when a lot of gay MEN got infected by a new STI that caught them unawares and was neglected by authorities because it was only killing gay men. Now, when you say "... their actions DO affect me in that the spread of STDs are more prevalent in the LGBT movement ..." you are including lesbians who are the least affected by that STI. Since the late 1960s I have had sex with over 39 different men and I have contracted no STI. It is the sexual act that causes infection, not the sex of the ppl doing it and you can practice safer sex whether gay or str8. So, maybe in your ill-informed mind you consider yourself not bigoted for being against a whole class of ppl but in every intelligent, informed person's mind when reading your comments they know you are an ignorant fool. When I first saw the post title, I figured TROLL !!! Who would come onto a HIPPIE forum and write such inflammatory, ignorant, right-wing-nut nonsense? It is still a consideration.
I just got around to going thru this entire thread and came across this idiocy. This guy is Christian-Indoctrinated Brain-Dead. Probably can't help himself. Initial diagnosis not a troll, just stupid. Logical case in point to this "can't reproduce" argument is my marriage for 20 years to a woman who could not have children. Then extrapolating that all str8 ppl (including him?) would "practice homosexuality."
Waste of time. You're only going to believe things that sound conservative; mostly shit that makes me want to throw up or break something.
Good Point Glen. And, let me take this opportunity to force my deviant and disgusting views down everyone's throat unimpeded. (BTW, my black wife used to deep throat me as well as any gay man).