Thin girls need not apply.

It seems very obvious to me that beauty is subjective. Please elaborate on those explanations if you are so certain that it isn't. Thanks in advance

 

Please , someone with an idea ?

 

You tell me why it is relative , if you know or can defend your position?

 

What the heck are you talking about?

Huh?

I believe the term was, "subjective" not "relative." Take your own advice and learn to read.

How can you possibly prove it's not subjective? What makes you think you're so special that you get to decide what is and isn't beautiful?

 

People have different opinions on what is beautiful. I could give millions of examples. In the vein of this thread: not all people are attracted to skinny girls for example. Just because it is the current standard of beauty does not make it universally so.

 

*jumps behind you and has my dukes up kingsberry rules like an old timey boxer* don't worry MAMA I got your back !!

 

The hipster look is another good one. Some find those black glasses beautiful, other are appalled by it. See, it's that simple.

 

I was happy to answer your question, but I asked one too:

 

I feel like the both of us have said this at least ten times in this thread. Then yet another person comes along and tries to say what they perceive is law. Why won't anyone listen to us??

Haha, let's get 'em!

 

As i said , the whole notion of beauty has been discussed by people who are much smarter than you.
Obviously you are unaware of modern intellectual thought.
Pierre Bourdieu, "Distinction" . various books on the concept of beauty .
Read the books, it is not relative.
When you say it is it just means you are ignorant, no taste , no idea.

 

Hey guys! Pierre Bourdieu said we're only allowed to find certain people attractive. I guess that means we better listen!

 

P.s. don't insult my intelligence. You don't know who the fuck I am.

 

lol queensbury rules and here they are

Rules[edit]

1.To be a fair stand-up boxing match in a 24-foot ring, or as near that size as practicable.

2.No wrestling or hugging (clinching) allowed.

3.The rounds to be of three minutes duration, and one minute's time between rounds.

4 If either man falls through weakness or otherwise, he must get up unassisted, 10 seconds to be allowed him to do so, the other man meanwhile to return to his corner, and when the fallen man is on his legs the round is to be resumed and continued until the three minutes have expired. If one man fails to come to the scratch in the 10 seconds allowed, it shall be in the power of the referee to give his award in favour of the other man.

5.A man hanging on the ropes in a helpless state, with his toes off the ground, shall be considered down.

6.No seconds or any other person to be allowed in the ring during the rounds.
Should the contest be stopped by any unavoidable interference, the referee to name the time and place as soon as possible for finishing the contest; so that the match must be won and lost, unless the backers of both men agree to draw the stakes.

7.The gloves to be fair-sized boxing gloves of the best quality and new.
Should a glove burst, or come off, it must be replaced to the referee's satisfaction.

8.A man on one knee is considered down and if struck is entitled to the stakes.

9.That no shoes or boots with spikes or sprigs be allowed. [7]

10.The contest in all other respects to be governed by revised London Prize Ring Rules.

Now we all know the rules *tosses around gloves* put em up put em up!!!...:sunny:

 

Haha, that's just a horrible reply. Not because you recommend a book of course but because you are condescending and insulting those who sincerely expressed their own opinions. And in the end have explained nothing. If you have read those books and I asked for a clarification of YOUR view why not sincerely elaborate.

 

Another example of what a pile of rocks sounds like. Don't kid yourself, buddy. Arrogance doesn't equal intellect.

 

Why don't we see if paul will post a picture of himself on this thread

 

Ooooooh snap.

 

Some people listen better when a message is delivered via a foot in the ass.

 

Right? And there lies the problem with internet debate.

 

I'm just point out some of the "thin hate" I was talking about earlier. You can be size zero and healthy. Tis all. I just wish we didn't all have to pick on each other.