Ikden This in no way results in truth of a matter. Science does not work off 'one time evidence' If it cant be repeated, without fail. It aint fact. Understood? Occam
Rocks do not tell you that. I believe someone has told you that 'dating' (which requires so many assumptions and presumptions and so on) has found a handful of 'clocks' that can be turned back for long periods of times. This has nothing to do with lifeforms. I think you misunderstood something someone told you - then took your misunderstanding as a 'proven fact'. Then eliminated other options based on this 'proven fact' you have been told about. Well.. hopefully no educated person intended to tell you that ancient rocks would in any way be evidence for 'evolutionion. Then again you might have been deliberately deceived? Again, I would ask you to consider why you accept that without question because someone told you it was so? Yet, If Moses tells you people came about some 6,000 years ago you will NOT accept that as a 'proven fact' like you did with your 20,000 year old human story. The figure of '6,000 years' is a rough give-or-take estimate based on geneologies, timelines etc. You wont find a 'contradiction' to 'point out'. You cant? I sure can... I think 'de'ceptive it the proper word for it too. Deliberately giving you a partially obscured truth sample and then attaching a fictional story around it. This is naturalistic evolutionism and it has every reason to protect the belief systems of 'materialists'. Mainly this is for 'moral implications' but for so many others.
Are you still saying tyranosaurs walked te earth in 6000 bc...LOL You keep scattering the word 'truth' throughout your posts... But ALL you say is based on a book put together by a bunch of politicians to be interpreted centuries latter by a bunch of bored thiests. ANd then YOU take what you like from it and call it TRUTH..LOL begat begat begat... Occam