The new conspiracy kooks

It's a nice idea, but IDK about that. I think the progressives on here would see those first four words, and stop reading because "Who the fuck cares what a white male thinks? Check your privilege!"

You must be sheltered, because I can dredge up several examples for ya.

Dear White People, Please Stop Pretending Reverse Racism Is Real

We’re all racist. But racism by white people matters more | Mona Chalabi

‘White men you must die’ say South African blacks at Overvaal school | Free West Media

White men must be stopped: The very future of mankind depends on it

Court declares 'Fuck White People' is neither racist nor hate speech''

Maybe you actually have seen this stuff, but fail to acknowledge this as bigotry and prejudice, because this is the GOOD kind of bigotry and prejudice

 

I don't remember ANYONE giving Clinton a pass on his blowjob. It was stupid and he was impeached for it and rightfully so. Some of you people sure make up a lotta'shit to make a point.

 

I feel sorry for whomever the contractors are working on whatever he's sitting in front of. They're more than likely working for nothing, as they'll soon learn.

 

I'm not clear on this. Did that impeachment actually go through or did he stay in office for the remainder of his term? I thought that he was impeached, but then I read or heard something to the effect of they had a trial but he never actually got impeached. Don't know which is true.

 

Just to help you a little: Its not that they would get more critical after reading those 4 words because they notice they're dealing with a white male, but because they recognize the typical approach. After all, a lot of progressives on here are white males themselves. I guess there are more progressive white males on this site than those typical ones that caricaturise white privilege so they can deny its a real thing.

The thing is do you encounter these people 'IRL' or look them up on the internet.

And to lend it to illustrate my own point: Are they an accurate representation of the left as you often insist on portraying it, or does the general left also laughs at or shake their heads at these extremes and this approach.

 

If that's the case, then it'd be nice if the left did more to distance themselves from these extremist loons. But they continue to embrace them for whatever reason.

 

Backatcha!

 

I stopped reading you long post right there. I would say the exact opposite is true.

 

You haven't explained --at least to me , why you admire him. What are his admirable qualities?

 

I doubt that. Not distancing themselves enough from them to your liking could just mean they're not focussing on them (like you chronically do). That way (and of course because you like to portray it as such) it may appear to you they 'continue to embrace them'. I suspect you simply equate a lack of the moderate left clearly distancing themselves from the libtards or alt/extreme left (or whatever the most fitting term for these exaggerating leftists are these days) with this continual embracing you talk about, which i rarely see. I see tolerance at best (like in a similar way the moderate left tolerates alt right tools on here, and continue to respect them with serious replies). And sometimes annoyed condoning.

 

These are people I have encountered in real life. Not caricatures.

 

He's a great bluffer. A real loud mouth who often got by intimidation and nice sounding but essential verbal jibberish what he otherwise couldn't get.

 

OK. There's three.. Excellent bullshitter. Threatens others. Does not speak well. Next.

 

Why dont you stop whitemansplaining to scratcho and let he and I talk and let him form his own opinions

 

Oh nevermind. Thought you were talking about me, not trump. Confusing since you are answering FOR ME

 

I'm not stopping anyone lol. You know how a public forum works right.
Edit:

Cool. Mistakes happen.

 

Have to flee---boys need roofing stuff------------back later.

 

Know I was partly joking.

I mean, yeah, Ben Shapiro and Milo do say a lot of true things. Mostly it's just simple logic, which seems to be lacking completely on the left. But really nothing these guys are saying is revolutionary. Everything they say is evident to anyone with a modicum of critical thinking ability. They don't say anything that is not blatantly obvious to me.

But none of these guys connect the dots and tell you what's really going on. They don't talk about who is in control of the universities, and what the true objects are in controlling vast hordes of useful college idiots and using them to push political objectives. None of what we see going on with regards to postmodernism and the SJW movement is grassroots by any means. Just like the alt-right is far from a grassroots movement, although I will agree there is more logic coming from that side, but to me it does not represent a true oppositional movement.