The Moon Landings Were A Hoax!!:

And you’re not the least bit suspicious that the rocks brought back from the moon
are of the same composition found here on earth (which initially shook the foundation of the scientific community to it's core) until one scientist came forward with a theory which everyone had to except because of the alternative (that it was all a hoax) was simply too shocking

Hotwater

 

.

 

Wait, what?? He stated enough facts to sway a grand jury.

 

The deserts of Nevada look more like Mars than the moon. The dust is not anywhere near deep enough or fine enough to make a convincing lunar surface.

Apollo missions 11, 12, and 14 through 17 are the ones in question. Apollo 7 and 9 went nowhere near the moon, while Apollo 8, 10, and 13 merely orbited the moon, 13 doing so due to a serious malfunction.

The Russians gave up because it is difficult to land a man on the moon, and they were too far behind in the race. They don't like to lose at anything.

There is a reason why they call this rocket science. It is difficult and complicated. They had to invent small computers to handle the math.

The moon is just a rock. And who ever said that the astronauts were at no risk of getting cancer? They knew they were signing up for a risky mission. They were all former military test pilots. They weren't afraid of shit. The long-term cancer risks of spending extended time on the moon are still not fully understood.

The surface of the moon was brightly lit. When the 70mm film cameras were properly adjusted for the lighting conditions, the dim stars simply went away. The astronauts could see the stars because the human eye can handle wider variations in light intensity than photographic film. Even modern electronic cameras would have trouble with such a wide range. The stars could be photographed, but the lunar surface detail would wash out white.

That's the way that low gravity works.

The stiff flag was shaking because an astronaut had touched it recently.

They never will, because they don't respect the people asking the questions.

You left out one of the most common questions from this group. There is a famous photo that is often questioned because the shadows are supposedly not dark enough. The reason for it is that the shadow area was lit indirectly with light reflected from the photographer's spacesuit.

 

I think Tang was a hoax. You ever tasted that stuff? It tastes like bilge water.

 

that might be.but if it's good enough for the astronauts,it's good enough for me.besides it makes a good cleaning agent.seriusly though i didn't know the stuff was still around.i drank it when i was a kid thinking i do have to make certain concessions for taste after all i am miles out in space orbiting the earth.

 

hmmm didnt the mythbusters take care of most of these conspiracies?

 

As I understand it, were there not 'rocks' brought back from the Moon?
(from more than 1 mission)
Wouldnt the fact that 'several' scientists / geologists examined them and drawn them to a more world wide source? or is it only a handful of people that have either lied or are incompetent in their examinations??
hmm perhaps too simple an observation
< Peace + Love ~ Save the Planet >

 

A total of over 800 pounds of rock and soil were brought back from the missions. Rocks like those (and meteorites from asteroids and Mars/moon) are not found naturally on Earth. There are no Earth rocks like these. None. Not to mention atmosphere comparisons, carbon dating, composition, etc.

The "we didn't go" conspiratards don't like science facts.

I find that hilarious!

 

Don't forget that big black oblong thing that they found.

 

Yeah, that's the real proof that we didn't go to the moon. Nobody could really drink that crap for 9 days.

 

True but the archies beg to differ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-iRO0VpJqk


Hotwater

 

i had forgotten about the archies band.(how could i have ? )i don't want to thumb my nose at tang too much.i remember drinking it and it probably saved me on some hot summer days....i'm more inclined to think they really did make it to the moon but i think there is room for skepticism.the debate i find almost as interesting as the event itself.

 

Yeah, it's absolute proof that you can't absolutely prove anything to anybody.

Hey, wait a minute...

 

Tang is advanced alien technolgy!

 

Just days away from the 40th anniversary of the moon landings.How will you celebrate this???:cheers2: :

Sunday 20th July 1969:


One small step for man.....one giant leap for the Incredible Hulk.

 

You mean how will we celebrate the greatest hoax ever perpetrated

I think I'll rent Capricorn One

Hotwater

 

Of course it was a hoax. You can't land spaceships on cheese! Jeez, what were they thinking?

 

:rofl: :rofl:

 

I guess some people think it was a hoax because they can't figure out how to land a man on the moon, and if they can't do it, nobody can. I suppose that means heart transplants and brain surgery are hoaxes too. And the whole world of high finance on Wall Street is a hoax. Wait a minute... That is a hoax...