The Joseph R. Biden Score Card

Liz Cheney/Adam Kinzinger Against Trump
Elizabeth Spurlock Lambert

Jim Wright: We know more about Biden's prostate than we do about that guy who allegedly tried to assassinate Trump.
We know more about Biden's prostate than we do about that OTHER guy who allegedly tried to assassinate Trump.
We know more about Biden's prostate than we do about Trump's tax returns.
We know more about Biden's prostate than we do about what Trump gave the Qataris in exchange for that gaudy gauche grotesque $400 million gold-plated bribe.
We know more about Biden's prostate than we do about what private information Trump's DOGE agents took from the Social Security Administration and the IRS. In fact, we know more about Biden's prostate than we do about that 22-year-old DOGE agent, Big Balls, who's currently porting our personal information to Elon Musk's corporate hard drives.
We know more about Biden's prostate than why the Saudis' gave Trump's son-in-law a $2 billion "loan."
We know more about Biden's prostate than Trump's shady $2 Billion crypto scam.
We know more about Biden's prostate than the details of Trump's secret Central American gulag.
We know more about Biden's prostate than we do about why Trump appeared so many times on Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs.
And yet, somehow, Biden's prostate is the single most important thing the media can think of right now. It's all consuming. It's the single most important topic to Republicans and the MAGA money machine, and it's as if none of them know just how many men have prostate cancer and live with it every day while going about their jobs and lives without it affecting their cognitive or physical abilities in any fashion whatsoever.
In fact, it's a pretty good bet that a significant fraction of those men currently questioning Biden's cancer diagnosis have prostate cancer themselves -- and know it, and are hiding it from the public because it's not relevant to the performance of their jobs.
But then, that's not even in the top 10 when it comes to the hypocrisy of politics.
The confusion on Republicans' part might be the cancer's location.
And the fact they perpetually have their collective heads firmly up their asses.
But I digress.
Here's the thing: voters and the Democratic Party leaders asked Biden dropped out.
So he did.
And THEN you had a chance to vote for someone who embraced many if not most of your values, who wasn't a goddamn fascist, and most of all who was young and fit -- except it turns out health really wasn't the issue, was it?
Biden's health issues doesn't explain why you didn't show up.
And, no, health really isn't the issue at all.
But keep flogging that dead horse, it's not entirely glue yet, I'm sure the press and the pundits and the politicians can squeeze it for another few grubby dollars.

 

The Democratic primaries and caucuses were held from January 23 to June 8, 2024.
As of April 2024, there were more than 190 Democratic candidates for nomination to represent the party.
So there were Democratic primaries, you have your facts wrong.
On March 12, Biden secured enough delegates for nomination.

Biden withdrew on July 21. Within 30 minutes of the announcement he endorsed Harris.
According to the rules of the Democratic party when Biden dropped out, potential replacements would have three days to declare their intention, and then another three days to secure the necessary number of delegate votes to be eligible for the nomination.
Harris was the only candidate that received the number of signatures required to be considered in a delegate vote.
She then received 99% of the participating delegate votes.

The vote was rushed and held before the convention because the Republicans choose to enforce a rule that stated that Ohio candidates must be certified 90 days before the general election, which would mean any hesitation would keep Harris off the Ohio ballot.
End of story.

 

Now the interview on The View.

Here is most of it:

​

Doesn't sound like a train wreck to me.​

 

Cancer prognosis doesn't always work.
Take the case of Frank Zappa, he had consulted doctors for years over urinary problems but cancer wasn't found until it was inoperable.
After various medical tests to figure out what was causing these problems, he was later diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer in 1990, and doctors ultimately informed him he had prostate cancer developing for years.

So one, "docors" (sic) aren't miracle workers.
Two, how would you know what Biden thought?
Three, if Biden wanted Harris to be president he could have gotten elected and then resigned and Harris, as vice president, would automatically become president.

The Democratic primaries and caucuses were held from January 23 to June 8, 2024.
Over 1,000 candidates filed.
JB Pritzker never ran for president in 2024.
He supported Biden in the primaries and then Harris.
Between the lines: Pritzker hasn't ruled out a future presidential run, but stepped aside in 2024 in favor of Biden's reelection campaign.

 

Medical science has advanced which may mean that they caught Biden's disorder recently and would not have even known about it 30 years ago.

 

Yet - why does in matter now? How does any of this focus on Biden's cancer, or how well he was when he was president, or why it took so long to be pushed out of a 2nd run - how does any of that impact today's situation? To me, it is a huge distraction from today's situation.

 

The point is everything is Biden's fault, or those who supported Biden.

 

We can change your observation to the phrase "Not all liars are posters on this site but all posters on this site are liars."
Makes just as much sense.
Everyone has lied some time in their life, except of course, those people who proclaim they have never lied.

Your Clinton example is flawed as it was found that he did not lie about having sex with Lewinsky as the question put to him was vague and too broad.
Clinton argued that sexual relations required sexual intercourse, which they did not have.
The law agreed.

The question of his definition of the word "is" was also found to be valid.
The law agreed.

So in this particular you could have used a better example.