Round and round we go (I'm more than familiar with this tactic). I admit how entertaining it is to see how every syllable that man says is taken absolutely literally. No wiggle room, he said it, so it must be. Since when has that been normal in politics?
I think it's comical that if you're not a declared leftist, you are automatically assigned as a republican. And the assignee never sees how fanatical it makes them look. I freakin LOVE bubble politics. What sucks though is how this utter lack of critical thinking will indeed bring us another term for Trump and even more people like him in the midterms. Hate is not a strategy, it just isn't.
Don't forget they don't like scientific facts about global warming. Pollution in the ocean is just a song by some whale lover. Now they feel like mining the Grand Stair Case for copper and mining the Grand Canyon for Uranium.
Well, your guy did say he will not touch Social Security and Medicare but will do so on Friday of this week.
Yes it is so for Trump. His people at Cambridge Analytica decided to make it a strategy. They wanted to capitalize on the hate of immigrants so they could energize the hate base. They made up fake stories about Muslims and used fake videos to enrage the haters in their base. Steve Bannon and Robert Mercer wanted this. They used the psychological profiles of Facebook users to sell their hate of immigrants. When protesters attended Trump speeches, he encouraged men in the crowd to beat them up and offered to pay for it. I'd say the country got took by that hate strategy.
At what point do Republicans realize how dangerous this is from a historical prospective? You are literally endorsing fascist dictatorship tactics because you hate Demarcates so much. Yet that party is the one undermining freedom. As a member of neither party you are the wrong side of history.
And there you go again with the "immigrants" nonsense. Few people have problems with honest, LEGAL immigration. The people sneaking in are not "immigrants", they're criminals. It really is that simple.
U.S. Quits UN Human Rights Council, Saying It’s Anti-Israel By Nick Wadhams June 19, 2018, 12:00 PM EDT Updated on June 19, 2018, 6:26 PM EDT U.S., China Rattle Trade-War Sabers in Vowing Harsh Tariffs
‘They just took them?’ Frantic parents separated from their kids fill courts on the border by Michael E. Miller June 9, 2018 ‘They just took them?’ Frantic parents separated from their kids fill courts on the border excerpt: "For the first time, federal courtrooms here and across the Southwest are being flooded with distraught mothers and fathers who have been charged with misdemeanor illegal entry and separated from their children — a shift in policy touted by the administration as a way to stop families from trying to reach the United States but decried by critics as traumatizing and inhumane. Last month a Honduran father separated from his wife and 3-year-old son killed himself in a Texas jail cell, The Washington Post reported Saturday. In McAllen alone, 415 children had been stripped from their parents between May 21 and June 5, according to federal public defenders. Now, on the morning of June 6, 14 more parents from Central America were facing an agonizing choice with uncertain consequences. They could plead guilty in the hope of speeding up their reunification with their children, but risk damaging their chances of receiving asylum in the United States. Or they could plead innocent and head to trial, a process that could take days or weeks and prolong their separation from their kids."
People seeking asylum legally are being coerced into pleading guilty with the hopes that they can be reunited with their children sooner. Trump and Sessions are using a very slimy tactic.
Big Money As Private Immigrant Jails Boom by John Burnett November 21, 2017 5:00 AM ET Big Money As Private Immigrant Jails Boom excerpt: "The Trump administration wants to expand its network of immigrant jails. In recent months, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has called for five new detention facilities to be built and operated by private prison corporations across the country. Critics are alarmed at the rising fortunes of an industry that had fallen out of favor with the previous administration."
How Trump Came to Enforce a Practice of Separating Migrant Families By Julie Hirschfeld Davis and Michael D. Shear June 16, 2018 How Trump Came to Enforce a Practice of Separating Migrant Families excerpt: "Technically, there is no Trump administration policy stating that illegal border crossers must be separated from their children. But the “zero tolerance policy” results in unlawful immigrants being taken into federal criminal custody, at which point their children are considered unaccompanied alien minors and taken away. Unlike Mr. Obama’s administration, Mr. Trump’s is treating all people who have crossed the border without authorization as subject to criminal prosecution, even if they tell the officer apprehending them that they are seeking asylum based on fear of returning to their home country, and whether or not they have their children in tow. “Having children does not give you immunity from arrest and prosecution,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a speech on Thursday in Fort Wayne, Ind. “I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13 to obey the laws of the government,” said Mr. Sessions, quoting Bible verse as he took exception to evangelical leaders who have called the practice abhorrent. “Because God has ordained them for the purpose of order.”"
Ordinarily immigrants, "legal" or otherwise, and refugees aren't treated like criminals and sent to "jail" without their children. No President has done this in the past. No law requires it. It's a matter of prosecutorial discretion, and Sessions, under Trump's direction, has opted to treat them all as hardened criminals--showing the same assholish rigidity as he's shown toward drug offenders. Three detention facilities have been set up in South Texas to house infants and toddlers separated from their mothers. The refugees could be put in detention facilities with their kids. The Obama Administration handled a major surge in migrants by detaining families together in administrative facilities..The Federal Sentencing Act includes a presumption of Release on Own Recognizance (ROR). Most white collar accused criminals are walking around loose with ankle bracelets awaiting trial. The Flores Settlement of 1997 sets limits on how long children can be detained and requires the government to release them to parents, guardians, or licensed facilities as quickly as possible and to house them in the “least restrictive” conditions possible if that cannot be done immediately.The idea of mass imprisonment of immigrants, "legal" or not, without their children is immoral. The analogy between these misdemeanor cases and the treatment of felons is faulty, and nobody is a "criminal" until found guilty after a trial. People with a conscience can see this. No law mandates the separation of parents and children. Common decency weighs against it. Monsters!
I admit I was probably WAY too generous by accusing only the fringe left of this type of shenanigans. Please don't tell me that Character Assassination is your ace in the hole on this one. I have in fact spoke out saying that a strong nuclear family structure is superior to the state. I've heard some of lefties of many varieties in my time saying they wanna do away with the nuclear family. But that's none of my business though.. Seems to me, that if criminal parents are using their children for collateral to commit their crimes, then they are really shitty parents. Lets say man and woman with a child stops at the southern border and tells the guard, "This is my child." They have no paperwork proving this. Do you let them pass? How do you differentiate between child sex traffickers and parents? Unlike the fringe right, I think its wrong to put people in jail and ruin families over victimless crimes. Like I already said.
Liberals will often demonize this kind of stereotyping, but it's interesting how often they like to put people in groups and assign labels for their own intent and purpose of stereotyping. - They call black people who don't vote democrat "uncle tom" - "Why do Log Cabin Republicans exist? You shouldn't be allowed to be gay and think like that." - "But you're a woman, how come you're not a feminist?" - "You can't be a libertarian AND a vegetarian" LOL - "Hip people aren't supposed to be conservative" Safe spaces and PC Language Policing ain't very hip either. Just saying.