The Donald Trump Score Card

and maybe attend an AA meeting.

fixed so that Ellie May can understand it.

 

That's funny!

 

Trump posts his usual 4th of July message


Trump Freaks Out Over Possible 'CRIMINAL CHARGES'

excerpt:

"Warmongering and despicable human being Liz Cheney, who is hated by the great people of Wyoming (down 35!), keeps saying, over and over again, that HER Fake Unselect Committee may recommend CRIMINAL CHARGES against a President of the United States who got more votes than any sitting President in history. Even the Dems didn’t know what she was talking about! Why doesn’t she press charges instead against those that cheated on the Election, or those that didn’t properly protect the Capitol?….."

 

That's what she is doing.

 

Mitt Romney says a return of Donald Trump would feed the nation's 'sickness, probably rendering it incurable'
Nicole Gaudiano
Mon, July 4, 2022, 2:45 PM

Mitt Romney says a return of Donald Trump would feed the nation's 'sickness, probably rendering it incurable'

excerpt:

"Sen. Mitt Romney says the nation suffers a "malady of denial, deceit, and distrust," and former President Donald Trump would make things much worse.

"A return of Donald Trump would feed the sickness, probably rendering it incurable," Romney, a senator from Utah and former GOP presidential nominee, wrote in a July 4 essay in The Atlantic.

The essay takes aim at "wishful thinking" across the political spectrum and the nation's "blithe dismissal of potentially cataclysmic threats."

"More and more, we are a nation in denial," he wrote, citing Trump's false assertions that he won the 2020 election as a "classic example." "Perhaps this is a branch of the same delusion that leads people to feed money into slot machines: Because I really want to win, I believe that I will win," he added."

 

Trump: Jan. 6 Panel 'Thugs' Should 'Go After' Americans 'Burning Down Cities'
Mary Papenfuss
Mon, July 4, 2022, 2:36 PM

excerpt:

"In a strange series of Fourth of July messages, Donald Trump insisted on Monday that the “Unselect Committee of political Thugs” on the Jan. 6 House panel should “go after” people “burning down cities.”

It’s unclear what the former president was referring to in his posts on Truth Social. No U.S. cities are being incinerated.

The major current crime crisis in America is a deadly series of mass shootings, many involving assault-style weapons — access to which Trump champions. There have been at least 308 mass shootings in the U.S. in 2022, according to the nonprofit data-tracking organization Gun Violence Archive."

 

Ummm... Which cities would those be? and... What does that have to do with Jan 6th?

 

The irony in the last part of that statement….

 

Typical Trump deflection, that’s never listened to. Those cities were rioted and burned because of him.

 

After a rant like that, the staff at his residence must be cleaning many ketchup splats off the walls.

 

... and ordering more ketchup.

 

Liz Cheney's chances vs. Donald Trump of winning 2024 GOP primary

excerpt:

"While there has been no reliable polling for the GOP primary, an internal survey from a pro-Hageman group released in June found the Trump-backed candidate has the support of 56 percent of voters, compared to 28 percent who said they would back Cheney."

 

Trump and Cohorts Now Facing Extreme Legal Peril - Insider NJ

excerpt:

"In particular, Trump attempted to influence Attorney General Bill Barr and his successor to announce that an actual fraud investigation by the Department of Justice had begun, and when that failed, Trump attempted to install and incompetent Attorney General to do his bidding until he was confronted with the threat of mass resignations by DOJ senior officials and had to back off.

Finally when all else failed, on January 6, 2021 Trump and cohorts tried to pressure Vice President Pence into illegally rejecting the electoral votes from certain swing states, and then gathered and incited a mob that Trump knew was armed to storm the Capitol and disrupt the final stage of the electoral process so that the election could be thrown into the House of Representatives. The evidence further established that after the rioters stormed the Capitol Building Trump took no steps to call up the National Guard or call off the demonstrators – most of whom were present because they thought Trump wanted them to be there."

 

Trump and Cohorts Now Facing Extreme Legal Peril - Insider NJ

excerpt:

"Based on the seizure of John Eastman’s telephone by federal agents and the service of other subpoenas, it now appears that a formal criminal investigation by the Department of Justice is underway. We also know that a separate state grand jury in Georgia is investigating Trump and Giuliani for attempting to illegally influence the election outcome in that state. This investigation is being run by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. According to news reports she has expressed confidence in the direction of her probe.

There is overwhelming evidence to convene a grand jury and to return an indictment for a myriad of charges, if the prosecution is so inclined. Conspiracy to commit sedition, conspiracy to obstruct the administration of justice, attempted fraud in the submission of invalid electors on behalf in Trump in the swing states, and even a racketeering conspiracy which would tie the whole scheme together from election night to January 6, 2021, are but a few of the available charges."

 

Interpretation: Article II, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3 | The National Constitution Center

excerpt:

"Historically, there has been an even more dizzying variety in the systems developed in each state. In the first presidential election, five state legislatures—in Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, and South Carolina—themselves simply designated presidential Electors without having any popular election at all.

In four states, the voters elected all of the Electors.

In Virginia, which had ten congressional districts, the General Assembly divided the Commonwealth into twelve presidential districts and conducted a popular election.

In subsequent elections, there have been statewide elections, elections of Electors from single-member districts that mirror Congressional districts, elections of Electors from specially designed multi-member districts, elections in which only the Electors’ names appear on the ballot but not the names of the presidential candidates, elections in which the presidential candidates’ names appear on the ballot but not the names of the Electors, and even elections where the state legislatures have chosen not to appoint any Electors."

 

Interpretation: Article II, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3 | The National Constitution Center

excerpt:

"All of these variations are allowable under the constitutional design. As the Supreme Court wrote in McPherson v. Blacker (1892), which rejected a constitutional challenge to a Michigan law providing for selection of Electors by a district system, “the appointment and mode of appointment of Electors belong exclusively to the states under the constitution of the United States.” We have no uniform national system for appointing Electors, which means the legislatures do not have to consult the public at all. When members of the Florida legislature in 2000 threatened to abandon the results of the statewide popular contest and appoint Electors for a particular candidate, the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore (2000) appeared to endorse their power to do so by denying that citizens have a constitutional right to vote in presidential elections. As the majority put it, “The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for Electors for the President of the United States. . .” When it comes to presidential elections, the voters are at the mercy of the state legislatures."

 

She will pick up the Democrat Vote in Wyoming.

 

Interpretation: Article II, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3 | The National Constitution Center

excerpt:

"Although this lack of procedural uniformity has not proven especially controversial, this fact has: the Electoral College has periodically produced winners who clearly lost the national popular vote to an opponent. In at least five presidential elections—1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016—the presidential candidate who prevailed in the popular vote lost in the Electoral College. For example, in the disputed election of 2000, Vice President Al Gore received over 500,000 more votes than Governor George W. Bush did nationally, but lost to Bush in the Electoral College by a vote of 266 to 271, after the Supreme Court intervened, on equal protection claims, to halt a Florida Supreme Court order to recount ballots in some counties. Many people believe that the ability to carry the whole election by capturing this or that state—in our time it has been Florida and Ohio—increases the likelihood of strategic mischief and corruption in the electoral process."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...to-switch-parties-to-vote-for-her-in-primary/