If birkas , minirets etc. are now being "regulated" in western europe ; it would seem to me that finally.........someone is getting their head out of their "bum". LOL.
That's because it suits your closeminded conviction. Minarets however are not banned because people are anti muslim like you, same with burkas actually. If a habit/custom of immigrants does not fit or even clashes with local customs it is worthwile to start a democratic discussion about it. The majority here regards an outfit that hides your face completely for religious reasons OR OTHER as unwanted. It's not a sign of banning regular muslims from european countries as you seem to have made of it There is no ban on muslims or their religion like you stated. Once again you have proven to be a victim of your own wrong and pathetic attitude. You can try and defend your initial false assumption all you like but it still makes you look like an idiot who refuses to admit he was 100% wrong.
However you wish to package it ; you are close to the flame and feeling the heat. Sure , ignore. Bow to your jihadist in chief. Sucker.
Wow, this thread was kind of interesting until everyone got side-tracked by burkas and who outlawed who. Is there any real evidence that Obama supports terrorism?
Billions sent to the muslim brotherhood? A close relative of hamas. I don't use the word "hate". It's not a family value.
You don't have to use the word in order to be drenched in it. I am not packaging anything, it is obviously you who shows up with false remarks. I am just pointing out where you are going massively wrong. We are just not going along with it, which seems to lead to you repeating the same burka joke and sharia in europe reference instead of making a reasonable and factual reply for once.
I wrote a paper called "The Rise of Islam" for my history class- I know. Futhermore, Obama did support Al Qaeda. The "black flag" is an Al Qaeda flag, so you're backing yourself against a wall, Odon. Gadaffi, like Assad, had support from their citizens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBStM58xjJk"]Gaddafi said it was Al Qaeda - YouTube It's open News, that there is an Al Qaeda group in Syria (called Al Nursa.) The "Free Syrian Army" is loosing troops and weapons to them. People who believe the mainstream news, believe total government Propaganda. Just like most of the shit in syria was a lie. "My people would die for me. It is Al Qaeda, they came for outside."-Gadaffi- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w20bX2k8qYg"]"Syria Danny" and His Many Staged Interviews - YouTube It's obvious they are allowing Al Qaeda to build up, but I don't think Obama is a Muslim. I think he supports Al Qaeda for his Corperate Interests. Maybe so we have a real enemy. This is the garbage, that makes people believe Obama's lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-DCZxsrt9I"]Truth About Danny Abdul-Dayem - YouTube Anyone can make Obama supporters believe a country is having a Revolution. It's Government LIES to drag us into war!
I don't mean to be an asshole, or insult anyone. It's just that when one starts looking into the reality of government, they are known to lie to us, plan terrorist attacks in the homeland, kill citizens etc. The only reason I knock on Obama supporters, is because they act like Obama is "different," and suddenly, anyone who questions government is a "crazy conspiracy theorist." I'm disappointed they can't see that they are using the same excuses and moral Bush supporters used back in the day. They tell me they don't support endless wars and, they do support freedom. But that's not possible, cause it's the opposite of what Obama does..
So, 'Libyan Rebels' are Jihadist terrorists'? You'll have to quote your links for it to make any sense... Thanks... No.
Obama has ended two "endless wars". Well, I know there are still some questions about Afghanistan, because the Afghan military is so worthless. I don't think Bush/Cheney would have ever ended them. Anyone who says there is no difference between Bush and Obama is ignoring as many facts as those who think Obama walks on water.
Iraq... The “status of forces agreement” that governed the departure of U.S. troops was actually negotiated between Iraqi and U.S. officials in late 2008, under the auspices of President George W. Bush. In fact, none other than the Huffington Post actually pointed out that as president, Obama was actually interested in keeping troops in Iraq past the agreed-upon 2011 deadline, explaining that “the president ultimately had no choice but to stick to candidate Obama's plan -- thanks, of all things, to an agreement signed by George W. Bush.” Just six months before the Bush deadline, Obama tried to foist 10,000 U.S. troops on the Iraqis past 2011. President Obama, of course, is not ending the war in Afghanistan. One of his first decisions about Afghanistan was to authorize a troop surge. Additional U.S. troops helped secure portions of the country, but there was no parallel political process to take advantage of the troop surge and U.S. troops are scheduled to remain in Afghanistan through at least 2024. http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/05/barack-obama-did-not-end-the-war-in-iraq http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/10/obama-vs-obama-on-afghani_n_676836.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/26/obama-iraq_n_1032507.html
Obama did NOT end war in Iraq, he reignited it as stated discussed here in the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/16/w...s-by-al-qaeda-in-iraq-officials-say.html?_r=0 In stead of just of staying ignorant about all this, take a very few minutes to read that NY Times article. Also that war in Afganistan is NOT over but is escalating as discussed here: http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/08/28/war-for-political-prestige-lost-causes-in-syria-and-afghanistan/ And that is what the " antiwar.com/blog " has to say about all this. Feeding weapons to these islamist groups is not helping anyone except the jihadists. How could it be otherwise if you think about it. If former pres. bush had done what obama is DOING you and those like you would be screaming WAR MONGER and war criminal and you know it. ...Oscar