Post Everything wrong with W

Discussion in 'Hippies' started by PeterPan, Jul 6, 2006.

  1. Politics are awesome

    Politics are awesome Politics suck

    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    they didnt have to :rolleyes: it wasnt the UN who went to war with Iraq, it was the U.S, GB, and the rest of the coalition.
     
  2. _chris_

    _chris_ Marxist

    Messages:
    9,216
    Likes Received:
    11
    they did...

    as otherwise, it goes against international law
     
  3. infoterror

    infoterror Member

    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not true -- he seems very focused on African Aid, ending world hunger and exporting Democracy to every nation worldwide.

    I think George W. Bush is a product of the times. It's our belief that liberal democracy and capitalism will save us, as well as our tolerance for sundry forms of theism, that empowers him.

    You wanted freedom? You got it: the face of it is George W. Bush.

    Now what do you want?
     
  4. Politics are awesome

    Politics are awesome Politics suck

    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes, because the UN is taken seriously nowadays.
     
  5. Politics are awesome

    Politics are awesome Politics suck

    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dude, you cant be fucking serious. :D ahahahahaha


    holy hell :D

    damn i wish i could sig quote right about now.
    how colbert of you :D
     
  6. _chris_

    _chris_ Marxist

    Messages:
    9,216
    Likes Received:
    11
    this arguement shows you are beaten; you seek to undermine the orgonisation that provides the law, instead of sticking to your origional argument, which stated no law was broken.
     
  7. Politics are awesome

    Politics are awesome Politics suck

    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    i'll admit i'm beaten if i think i am.

    Iraq broke the agreements which it made with the UN after the first Gulf War. This could have given the UN the authourity to go to war, but that's not what the UN does. Since the UN itself wasn't going to war, why should it have to approve what its member countries do? The armies of the member countries are not the armies of the UN. The UN has their own peacekeeping force. Since every single political person in the US who had to vote for the war voted for it, no laws were broken.

    but really, even going on my last argument, this war is completely legal. The UN shouldnt even be in existence anymore -- they've proven their uselessness and corruptness. therefore the only people who would have to approve the decision are the members of congress and the house of representatives -- which every single person did. and yes, the us obviously has recognised iraq's sovereignty, but that doesnt mean that the U.S. cant renege and change past laws and treaties. it happens almost every day in this country and in legal systems around the world. if it werent for this reneging things such as slavery would still be legal.
     
  8. _chris_

    _chris_ Marxist

    Messages:
    9,216
    Likes Received:
    11
    Just because you dont like the UN, doesnt mean that they dont exist and their laws dont exist
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice