Pornstars should use condoms

you live in the internet?

 

I bet John Holmes wished he'd worn a condom (if he could have found one to fit).

And the deal about HIV and AIDS not being real - what a bunch of stupid bs. Can you say ostrich stick your head in the sand?!?

 

no. SFV

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U7HztvetQk

 

Yes yes, condoms are responsible. But we don't have to worry about getting pregnant or getting stds when we're going hand-solo. My fantasies definetly do not involve condoms, because I hate the damn things. I like the freedom of watching people going at it without one because that's what i'm into... IN MY MIND that's okay.

We're not setting a bad example in todays youth because we don't get porn stars to wear condoms. If they don't understand that they should be wearing condoms they shouldn't even be watching porn, they should be watching spongebob.

Because school drill that into kids heads these days, and any responsible parent lets there kids know how to properly protect themselves.

Porn isn't to blame. And I will have my porn damnit.

 

correct

 

:love:

 

to some.

 

It doesn't bother me that there are those that disagree with me.
Nor does it bother me if there are people that believe I'm crazy for my opinions.

What I find very disturbing is that there are people that will vehemently argue a position without having even made the smallest effort to educate themself on the subject.

It's not very open minded and it's not very "hippie." Whatever happened to the slogan, "question everything" or the slogan "question authority." Or these just more things that died in with my generation in the 1960s

 

Luc Antoine Montagnier is a French virologist and was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine, for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Listen to what he says on the subject. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAPZnPuPuwc&feature=related"]YouTube - SIDA la vérité - Professeur Luc Montagnier - vf

 

porn stars as role models?? what, are you trying to ruin porn?????? :frown:

young girl - 'oh hello mr police man, i'm all wet'

mr officer - 'that's because you spilled your drink, ma'am. here's a handkerchief...'

young girl - 'you are such a sexy man, please take me to dinner, buy me roses, hold my hand!!!'

mr officer - 'i'm going to get all up in your hands. someday i might put a ring on a finger'

young girl - 'then we can have protected sex after marriage! i'm so hot!!!

mr officer - '... here, borrow my portable handheld fan.'

 

"If ignorance is bliss then knock the smile off my face," Rage Against the Machine.

Stay Brown,
Rev J

 

that's it, blame the condoms..

ok, ignorance is still being allowed to use this website.

not everyone was a hippie in the 60s either.

questioning everything includes questioning those who question authority. otherwise you're just following someone else.

 

I'm not trying to say that being from the 60s is necessary. I'm just saying that if you're going to identify with the movement. You should embrace some of the basic tenants. For example, questioning the given order of the day.

Afterall, the media would have everyone think that being a hippie is only sex, drugs, music, not showering and refusing to look for a job. Trust me, that is a very simplified view to the point that I would argue it's a reductionist argument.

 

that's fair. you have to remember though, that not everyone that posts here identifies with the movement.

 

Fair enough,
But questioning the order of the day is still a good habit.

 

I agree 100% No wrappie, no tappy!

 

:2thumbsup:

 

lol @ this statement turning into a 6 page discussion