For those of you that believe all of this is bunk, perhaps you'd like to read a statement by Republican member of congress from Texas Ron Paul. http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst082806.htm http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html
Washington and Oregon have issued official resolutions opposed to the NAU/SPP: http://www.leg.state.or.us/07reg/measpdf/sjm1.dir/sjm0005.intro.pdf http://www.leg.wa.gov/pub/billinfo/2007-08/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Joint%20Memorials/8004-Prosperity%20partnership.pdf
Yeah, Pepik would like us to believe this push for an NAU isn't real WHILE Washington and Oregon have issued resolutions against it. I don't know what reality pepik is living in, but whatever it is, States pass resolutions for things that don't exist...
The point is he's not reporting on an actual plan for a North American Union, he's reporting on what critics are calling 'nothing more than a North American Union' (thanks Gardener). The funny thing is that just because people perceive this as somehow anti-Bush, they want to jump on the bandwagon, even though it is being promoted by the racist, lying isolationist right wing that brought you Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. The fact that Ron Paul is trying to score points by opposing something that isn't actually happening doesn't make it more credible, it makes it less credible.
Washington and Oregon also referred to it as NAU/SPP, you can argue symantics all you want. Ron Paul is one of the few legislators that seem to read bills and understand what their are signing before they do. We can pretend it isn't happening all we want, that's what the Council for Foreign Relations wants us to do. They want it to be a fact before the average public of the three nations is even aware it's being negotiated. Funny if you check them out most of the PNAC are now employees or affiliates of the CFR.
And Ron Paul is probably more aware of what you call the non-existent NAFTA highway actually is, since he's in Texas and his constituents have had their property confiscated so that elitists from Spain can build a toll road through our nation.
Got love the moniker they gave their evil creation "Security Prosperity Partnership". Everyone should fall behind such a beneficit title. Bet they hired a marketing team to come up with it. Some of us realize the original name for the Iraqi invasion was Operation Iraqi Liberation (OIL). Bet they had a good laugh at our expense when they changed it to Operation Iraqi Freedom...how dumb do they think we are?
The fact is it's not that we are anti-Bush...We are PRO AMERICA! And that doesn't mean pro-corporate America. It means we want to protect our rights and our constitution. If corporations want to abide by that fine if not I for one am not for changing it just to up their profit margin. And the corporations lobbying for this are no longer American corporations....they've gone offshore. They don't value their roots they only value their bottomline.
We let these same people drive us into war in Iraq, do we wish to let them accomplish their motives on our own continent, without question?
Want to know about the neo-cons: http://www.cfr.org/publication/7592/think_again.html They have their next stages worked out. They have their arguments in place. I definitely want to follow Strauss's model, don't you? But then I am not part of the "well-educated elite".
I feel honored to be considered a neocon-basher. I will continue to be one as long as they plan to guide the future of the country I live in without full disclosure. I didn't elect them and they should not have the power to affect the governance of my country. Let the majority of them move to Israel and govern that country without US aid.
Pepik, why don't you stop being a shill and a globalism cheerleader and actually start using your brain. the US has no reason to support Israel with all the money we give them, I say we cut it completely, this way we get ourselves out of this entire middle east/israeli conflict. But of course this could never happen with zionist lovers like you.
I didn't say move them out. I said let them move to Israel, since that seems to be where there true loyalty lies.
Really? Are you saying that witchcaft must have existed, since laws were passed against it? Show me a link to a passed resolution. Its quite funny that you have suddenly discovered such faith in right wing state senators. As if cranks have never written meaningless resolutions to pander to the constituents. If there really were a North American Union, you'd be able to produce actual evidence of it, not evidence that some xenophobes think it is coming. I asked for the NAU, I got links to the SPP. When I asked again, i got links to academics. Then Rat tells us about the superhighway they are building, and when I point out there is no new highway, it already exists, he runs away. You're asking me to disprove something for which no evidence exists.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=15497 http://www.newswithviews.com/Kress/joe6.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 Now let's watch Pointbreak argue over semantics. Notice how he always attacks the source while ignoring the heart of the discussion. When he enters the debate, it quickly goes off tangent, into an argument about Right-wingers or anti-Semites or xenaphobes. Typical socialist drivel. It's always some kind of diversion with this idiot. Proves what his agenda is, which is basically to defend every move the Bush administration and its globalist handlers make. It's amazing how anyone could take this guy seriously. He is almost as good as Bush when it comes to dodging questions. Guess what Pepik/Pointbreak? The world isn't flat!