Non weed drugs

yeah, klonopin, thanks!
it was driving me insane
well, the bars cause me to black out and i become evil.
especially when i mix them with alcohol.
the pills, effect me like hydrocodone, sort of.
they make me mellow and shit like that.
especially when i mix them with alcohol.

it all depends on the individual.

 

it's the same shit but one effects me differently than the other.
it's all individuality-based, i know people that can't take the pills, but can eat bars. i know people that can't eat bars, but can eat pills and i know people that can't handle either and i know people that it doesn't effect them at all. i'm one of those that can eat pills and not turn into a murder rampage.

 

That is probably because one should never take psychiatric meds that are not prescribed for one; to do so may induce a very unpleasant reaction. ALL psych meds, bar none have the potential to make the patient worse, not better; now imagine what that might do to a 'normal' brain.

As for mixing psych meds with alcohol..... very bad idea indeed. They do not mix chemically, and can cause big problems...

 

life is a gateway drug.

 

i agree with this.

 

Don't tell me you can't see the logic in that? Of course there's no conclusive evidence, because marijuana is illegal. It stands to reason that if young people didn't have to buy their weed from street dealers, then they may never even see those other drugs.

 

ohh i can just see the sunshine's rays.

 

It only affects you differently because of the different amounts of alprazolam. If you took more of the "Pills" as you call them, then it would be the same as if you took some bars.

And xanax has NOTHING in common with lortabs, so I don't know where you're coming from with that. Lortab(hydrocodone) is an opiate pain reliever and xanax(alprazolam) is a benzodiazepine prescribed for anxiety.....it's a tranquilizer.

 

yes for sure

 

even if weed were to become legal
you don't think that teenage rebellion will rise again?
then weed will become "mediocre" after a while
even decades after legalization...
but they may read about the other drugs...
and will want to experiment and whatnot.
so, it repeats itself.
so once marijuana will be a regular, legal substance, like cigarettes...
something else will become the gateway prohibtion drug, you know?

 

Also, hippy i am, what do the "pills" look like? Are they shaped like footballs? If they affect you and everyone else that differently, as opposed to bars, then they're probably not really xanax. Xanax is xanax is xanax, regardless of what kind of pill it is.

 

But if it were legal, then it wouldn't be looked down on as much and people wouldn't consider it to really be a drug. It would be more like alcohol or cigarettes, so people may not even relate weed to other drugs.

 

*Sigh*

Was it your mission when you woke today to contadict everything I say here?

Your theory is based on assumption - the kind that the anti-pot lot have been making for decades, by the way - not on fact. Mine is based on hard evidence.

Simple as.

On top of which, of course, not all dope dealers deal other drugs, not all dealers advertise any other drugs they deal to their dope customers, and not all drug users are 'young people'. Far too many generalisations to be accurate.... unlike the model I posted.

 

You contradicted ME. And yes it's based on assumption, but if you think about it, if makes sense. I know not all dope dealers deal other drugs. You don't seem to even be looking at my posts objectively....you're just brushing all of my shit off, based on what you THINK you know, as if you are an expert on everything when, in fact, what you have been saying all day is no more or less likely than anything I have said. I'm tired of dealing with hardheaded folks all the fuckin time.

 

sometimes logical assumptions are all we have to go on.

as for non weed druugs, sure I love my psychedelics very much so. However, I also love cocaine dearly

 

that's what mine look like.
and that is xanax, trust me.

 

Why am I hardheaded? Because my logic and medical know-how shits all over your biased opinion?

I told you, I'm a healthcare professional; I say this stuff because I do know, not because I am assuming! I know the difference between a conclusive report and a specualtive one; you do not seem to.

Therefore, I am looking at your posts the way I do, because when you have been at the campaign trail as long as I have, you hear these same tired old arguments, day in, day out... You have not presented me with anything new; just the same stuff every person like you I have ever met expounds. And I can tell you this; if you were to raise these points with any seasoned stoner that has a modicum of medical knowhow, you'd be told the exact same things I have told you.

Do grow up... Getting all aeriated over the Internet is a bit sad... isn't it?:&

 

You just don't seem to be very objective about anything at all. You are a know-it-all, apparently. "Healthcare professionals" can be just as wrong as everyone else.

 

I'm not a 'know-it-all' at all; but I'm not likely to pass comment on that which I do not claim to understand now, am I?

I speak from experience, and from fact; not from conjecture. I am not objective about this issue, because, as I keep saying, there is nothng to be objective about, as it stands.

Sorry if that offends you...but it is true.

 

No, ignorance doesn't offend me at all, because you can't really help it.

You're speaking from experience and fact? So it's a fact that I am wrong in assuming that prohibition is the true gateway?

There is something to be objective about, btw. You're talking all this shit about what seems most likely to you, while not even considering the possibility that I am right. Who knows? My theory is certainly possible, I think.