Can't they just be standing in your opposition? I would at least expect you to be courteous to people who have a different viewpoint than your own. Criminal or not. I don't believe the things that Pepik has expressed here on these forums or in the past has to be discredited by the fact that you believe he works for the government. If you have actual proof, then please bring it forthright. Otherwise, lay off the CIA-FBI-thought-Police trolling accusations.
I don't have proof that he is a government op, but he certainly displays the characteristics of someone engaging in counter-intelligence. He contributes nothing to these forums. We don't know what his opinions are because he has never made them clear. All he does is attack other people while never bringing anything of his own to the table. He doesn't participate in discussions, he derails the discussions. He talks about not providing evidence, but where is the evidence for the things he claims, such as the accusation that I'm an anti-Semite? If you Google search the guy's screen name, you get multiple returns linking to other websites where he engages in the same inflamatory rhetoric. So if he is a disruption and makes up lies about people, then why should he not be banned? Trust me, I am strongly opposed to banning people unless they are absolutely causing a disturbance. I have known people that have been banned from this website for no good reason other than having their own opinion, yet Pepik has been able to get away with his bullshit for the past year or two without any repercussions until now.
Well, it's good to know that you have a significant amount of influence over what is considered to be trolling between you and Skip. I have seen you flame other forum members, insult other members for taking an opposition to your views and display the characteristics of paranoia. I don't really care what Pepik does or has done outside of this site. It has no merit as to what he has contributed here.
And what has he contributed here? Please point out his contributions that don't involve trolling and attacking others. Also, point out a recent instance where I have flamed people. Everyone at this site knows Pepik is the defender of everything neocon. Anything that is critical of the government, he attacks. So I guess you pretty much agree with his views: war is good, corporations are godly, politicians love you, and everything is just dandy and as it should be? If you are in agreement with those things, fine, but that doesn't mean you should defend his actions in making up malicious lies about people and derailing their threads.
Would you mind if I asked you for proof that he made up malicious lies about people and derailed threads? Can we assume he is innocent until you can actually prove that he is guilty?
And if you want to know why Pepik was banned, it was for him attacking me while contributing nothing in terms of substance. Not that I could care about what he says or thinks about me, it's just that myself and others are getting sick of the way he comes in and basically hijacks people threads. In this case it was Skip's thread about Obama. His comment has since been removed.
I am not going to take the time to dredge his threads up and send this thread even more off course than it is. But numerous times he has accused me of being an anti-Semite, believing things I don't subscribe to, saying things I have never said, frequenting websites I don't go to, and basically acting like he knows me personally when he has never met me. I am still waiting for you to answer what his contributions were and why you are defending him. But nevermind because I am through discussing this. I think you just like arguing with me. I think it turns you on.
He was a Jewish man from Canada. The guy was opinionated, educated and a little cranky. I didn't let it bother me as much as it did you, I guess. But then again, I don't get nearly as many "HEY PRESSED_RAT LOOKITMEEEEE!" retorts. Not all of his posts were useless. Most people come to this forum to relax. If the guy was a member of many forums, why wouldn't he post his two cents and leave it at that and move on? I thought he brought some balance and intelligence to some of the discussions going on in the Politics forum. I will miss him. http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3855100#post3855100 http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3847199#post3847199 http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3846082#post3846082 http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3881232#post3881232 http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3877248#post3877248
Yup, the guy has shill written all over him. Do you know the guy personally or something? How do you know he is a Jew from Canada?
I noticed that he used to have a Czechoslovakian flag under his avatar. I remembered that he said something about Prague, only he was talking about living in the UK or something. I also remember talk about Canada. So about a week ago I PMed him and asked him about his background. He told me he graduated from McGill, his mother was American, his father being Canadian and he is living in the UK. His french wasn't very good, but that's probably one of the reasons why he chose McGill. Told me that he had three passports. I don't think he works for the CIA. EDIT: He didn't explicitly tell me that he was a Jew, but I remember him saying that he was Jewish some time. (I've been browsing the forums for a couple years now.) I can tell by the way he posts that he was Jewish, the way he talked about Syria, Lebanon and Israel and how he reacted to some of the things that you have said about Jews. I'm a Catholic, and I know he was a Jew.
Well, I can tell he's a zionist. Zionists aren't always necessarily Jews. He's a pro-Israel hate-monger, just like the rest of the neocon murderers.
PressedRat, explain to me exactly what your political ideology is? Where do you stand on the spectrum, it seems you often enjoy "flip flopping" so please take a clear standpoint.