Model and actress attacked and hospitalized for being white

I guess what I said about debating me was stupid but I have researched the subject of race and crime a lot. It's my opinion that it may be in their genetics to behave a certain way but it may have been beneficial back in the past for reasons I don't know about.

You can say that what I'm saying is racist but it wasn't meant to be offensive.

 

Why not show it in debates on here? One advice: take your time to explain things well. Don't answer unnuanced and in a hurry just because of the speed of the convo etc.

Mel asked good questions about that. In european history it shows our white ancestors behaved very similar. If you disagree I think you should perhaps specify.

I don't mind giving you the benefit of doubt. We will see how you handle such topics.

 

Statistics show that blacks and Latinos commit more crimes than whites and Asians. I provided statistics for that. Here are the statistics again - https://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22-wp...ntent/uploads/2016/03/Color-Of-Crime-2016.pdf

Acted similar in what way? Can you provide statistics? I don't mind being proven wrong.

Alrighty. c:

 

No, you say they used to behave in a certain way in Africa in the past, which was more beneficial to them back then. I assume you were hinting at criminal and violent behavior, just like our ancestors. If not, you should specify what you ment there first.
Yes, it is clear what you ment about american society. But its arguable its primarily due to genetics.

 

Statistics 101
Correlation does not equal causation.
In other words, just because you found some stats on crime that show blacks and Hispanics commit crime at a higher rate, does not mean they commit crime at a higher rate because they're black or hispanic.

You're not proving any points by posting the same statistics over and over, especially if you're not willing to really dig into those stats to examine all factors that could come into play

 

I dont believe she or those got jumped by 10, and the only thing she got was a swollen face and split eye.
Ive had worse falling on ice.
I think the musinex guy is right. This sounds made up..

 

I didn't say that they did act a certain way in the past I said they may have acted a certain way in the past that was beneficial to them and it may be in their genetics.

I agree with you that it doesn't show they commit higher crimes because they are black or Hispanic but these are just my observations based on the similarities of crime and such in their own native countries and how they behave as a minority in others.

 

Also I wonder if cloudy has any idea that hispanic people are a mix of european, african, and indigenous ancestry
Should we tell him?
It might blow his mind..he'll have to grapple with the probability that it might be the precious european genes causing such a ruckus in latin america

 

Wouldn't be the first time this thread starter posts a charged or inaccurate article (or a particular acount of an event) in order to trigger libtards in making a comment that could be explained as they hating their own race/heritage.

 

I knew that already. You're acting as if I think Europeans are superior and can do no wrong and I never said that, haha!

 

We act like that connotation is there because its implied in your assertion. Blacks and hispanics are worse at something than other races/ethnicities, like whites... because of their genes. It's only logical. You don't have to say it explicitly for others to notice that. What's unfortunate is that you do not seem to grasp what your own opinion means.
If blacks are morally or disciplinary inferior due to their genes compared to other races, that would make those other races superior to them in that regard. No, it doesn't mean you are a conscious and active white supremacist. But yes, it does imply you think Caucasians are superior in that regard.

 

You may take it anyway that you like. Be my guest. c:
All I'm saying is that it shows statistically that Whites and Asians don't commit as many crimes in these fields.

 

No, you were saying something else too: that's it due to their genetics.

 

That it's possibly due to genetics in my opinion they behave a certain way, correct. That's it.

 

So it's only ok to hypothesize genetics are involved when it's a trait that society at large deems as positive?

 

How are the European genes causing a ruckus in Latin America?

Before the Europeans got to Latin America, the natives were enslaving each other and tearing the hearts out of living virgins to sacrifice them to the gods.

No ethnicity has a clean history; if you turn back time far enough, you’ll see that people of all races and terrestrial biomes have dome some fucked up stuff at one point in time or another.

 

[

Damn dude are you okay? That's the third time in 2 days I've seen you take something seriously that was intended as a joke

I was making fun of cloudy's genetic philosophy. Should be pretty obvious by now that I dont think any race has a genetic predisposition towards violence

 

No. It’s revealing the double standards of how the media and society interprets racism and hate crimes.

A few years back when I made a thread about the black teenagers who kidnapped a retarded white teen, and live-streamed his torture, I was accused of being a racist for posting the story

 

It's ok to hypothetize about anything. But it seems to be equated with eachother in your previous lengthy post about it too. I didn't respond to that because I don't see the point in assuming blacks are more prone to crime due to their genes because there's an other (physical) aspect they ARE generally better at. Sure, everything is possible and opinions are entitled to be hold, but no, just because blacks are on average better at basketball because of genetics, doesn't mean they being more prone to crime is also due to their genetics. It's a loose connection of dots. Pseudo science if asserted in seriousness. At least at this point as far as I know. I'm ready to be shown differently

 

thanks for clarifying