Manchester Arena Explosion

Nope. Still got no idea what you're on about

 

Dafuq is Mozzer going on about, he must be in one of his drunken hazes again.

 

Ariana Grande's concert wasn't an arbitrary choice for this attack. The statement from Isis said the concert was "shameful". Obviously those Muslims of such an extremist nature object to the idea of eight year old girls going to see an artist whose lyrics contain such gems as "A little less conversation and a little more touch my body".

The great irony of this is that Mohammed purportedly married a nine year old girl, and Isis members in Syria routinely rape and slave very young girls Etc, and that's a fact.


The hypocrisy of this makes me a little angry. And it's bloody stupid.

Note to mods: I think we should be allowed to consider all aspects to this massacre as long as it doesn't descend into a clanging match.

 

That's taken a but out of context. And to claim it lower than a terrorist bombing is pure leftist bullshit.


She answered Yes to a question as to whether or not she was prepared to use military force that would kill that many people. The question was asked in a semi hostile tone that was purposed to question her strength and resolve in fighting terror. It's not as if she actually came out and uttered the entire phrase, unbidden.....I will kill one hundred thousand people gladly.

Also, that hypothetical killing is not one of innocent kids at a concert. It would be done only as a final resort in a event necessitating military action.

Read the entire article and quote and you will also see she later said she thought it wrong to use force like that. And would never do do if there were other viable options.

Linking a politicians invoked comments on welding necessary military power with a terrorist bombing killing dozens of innocent is despicable.

Even for the likes of your tribe.

 

Glad someone Gets it ^^^

And to the others We will just have to Agree to Disagree I am tired and I got work in the morning
Goodnight !

 

Yes, to help with the confusion, I marked the "News" section post with the word "News". We'd like to have that section contain only news, and condolences of course.

 

IS are fanatics following a toxic, twisted and barbaric ideology. Everything flows from that.

 

Theresa May has the blood of thousands of people on her hands as an indirect result of her policy on drugs, and her party's policy on benefits sanctions. Want to know how many people have died of starvation and suicide since the tories were elected in 2010? Whatever hypothetical statement she made regarding genocide is irrelevant. The woman is a psychopath.

I'm pretty sure though I made it clear that I was comparing something that happened with something that could happen, based on a public admission by the incumbent PM.

Call it what you like, but dropping a nuclear bomb on a country and killing 100,000 people is just a bit worse than bombing a few scores of little girls.

I'm sure you'd be the first to concur with that if it was North Korea firing a missile into your ranch.

 

Out of context quotes are favorite weapons of The Unscrupulous Libtard.

LOL

 

Argumenta ad hominem are popular ways for people to try to reinforce their hollow arguments.

 

Morrow, I'm very sorry your friend's child is among the missing.

I do hope and pray that she is found alive.

 

https://streamable.com/pzqnm

This is Steve, a homeless man who was near the Manchester Arena last night and rushed to help young victims...

 

Bless him.

 

I Seem To Have Something In My Eye.....



Cheers Glen.

 

...but you're above that sort of thing...right?

 

Every leader who has the power to make the decision to use nuclear weapons has to be willing to use them (or at least say so publicly), or else there would be no point in having nuclear weapons in the first place. Is it really the case that no PM before her was willing to use nukes?

Being willing to use nukes in a worst-case scenario is different than blowing up kids for no damn good reason. This seems to be a distinction that everyone gets but you

 

Ok for Clarity then (as no one seems willing to admit ) to understanding !

Do you think the actions of this bomber a Justified response to Britain's involvement in the fight against ISIS ?

Cant make My question any clearer !! No more Bullshit just an answer please

 

morrow...... Have Your Friends Had Any Word Of Their Missing Daughter Yet...???



Cheers Glen.

 

But she already answered.
No one said it's justified.
But it's not like this sort of stuff happens for no reason, out of the blue.

And Britain was involved in the middle east before there was ISIS.