Japan Disaster! Hit By 9.0 Earthquake, Huge Tsunami, Nukes Meltdown

Discussion in 'Latest Hip News Stories' started by skip, Mar 11, 2011.

  1. Logan 5

    Logan 5 Confessed gynephile Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    198
    I won't call them unintelligent, but no more (or less) human than the rest of us.

    The reactor incident is not because they are corrupt- yes some corruption has been shown when it was found they "smudged" the records showing they took the cheaper route with safety features, after all American, Brits, French, Germans and even Russians have done that in their own respective nations.

    It is an accumulation of events. A serious earthquake; a powerful tsunami; nuclear reactors with insufficient back up systems. Just a matter of time it happened, just the shittest luck it happened in Japan.

    What if it happened in France? Germany? Russia? Canada? Or the US? Would they be "unintelligent" as well?

    Shit happens homey.


    And how is this samurai talk relevant to this issue?
     
  2. papa wolf

    papa wolf Member

    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    3
    NO , NO You're getting it all mixed up and out of context . I didn't make the remark that they were "unintelligent" , and have no idea where you're getting this "corruption" thing.

    In MY post # 379 I quoted a post from 7he4author that has now apparently been deleted for what ever reason. That authors post referenced how they were "unintelligent" for getting "nuked" in w.w.2 , and to Japan's modern day cultural resemblance of same said ww2 culture .

    The author was speaking of the cultural attitude of Japan in ww2 . Hence my reply to his post of the said cultural attitude of ww2 . So since his post was geared at ww2 and not of the melt down happening today , then so too was my response to his post . And since I disagreed with the o.p. , I stated my reasons why .

    Yes for the record I know the exact reason the melt down happened . And it had nothing to do with "shitty luck " nor " corruption ". It happened because it was placed to near the coast , in a known very active and very deadly earthquake fault . That extends like a horseshoe around the pacific ocean to Washington st. and Alaska , Who as " shitty luck" would have it also have nuke plants built to close the coast . Just waiting for the next flood to take out their backup power as well .

    So I'm sorry it caused confusion on your end , and I shall try in the future to stay " relevant " to the o.p. suggested thread topic . Oh well I guess " shit happens homey " !
     
  3. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    one could not predict , with all the computer generated models of today and yesterday. The island would sink 3 to some 8ft. Lowering tsunami walls even further than currently designed.. As you can clearly see. There was a defensive barrier built around the plant. It was not designed to take on "end of the world waves", which common sense can tell you..... The Seas are not predictable..
     
  4. 7he4uthor

    7he4uthor Member

    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    6reat post
    1ve imported this to the other sites i report on:sunny:



    Here are some recent aerial photos of the nuke plants
    this is the kind of posts we need 2c here ---->
    http://cryptome.org/eyeball/daiichi-npp/daiichi-photos.htm





    edit to add this

    Fukushima Radiation Lies – Massachusetts Rain is Radioactive
    http://www.morningliberty.com/2011/03/28/fukushima-radiation-lies-massachusetts-rain-is-radioactive/



    Officials says report of radiation at 10 million times normal levels inside Fukushima nuclear plant was inaccurate
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/27/501364/main20047606.shtml


    The Radiation Effects Research Foundation Website
    Private, nonprofit Japanese foundation, supported by the U.S. and Japan governments, that conducts research and studies on the effects of radiation exposure
    http://www.rerf.jp/index_e.html



    Highly radioactive water has been found for the first time outside one of the reactor buildings at Japan's quake-hit Fukushima nuclear plant, officials say.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12881015


    please post any info you think may help ppl

    the intention of the thread is positive
    geared to help people ... that’s all.






    Japan map of Japan Radiation
    http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=4870
     
  5. 7he4uthor

    7he4uthor Member

    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    technical problems see next post
     
  6. 7he4uthor

    7he4uthor Member

    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    ==================================================

    Here are some recent drone aerial photos of the nuke plants
    http://cryptome.org/eyeball/daiichi-npp/daiichi-photos.htm

    Fukushima Radiation Lies – Massachusetts Rain is Radioactive
    http://www.morningliberty.com/2011/03/28/fukushima-radiation-lies-massachusetts-rain-is-radioactive/

    Officials says report of radiation at 10 million times normal levels inside Fukushima nuclear plant was inaccurate
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/27/501364/main20047606.shtml

    The Radiation Effects Research Foundation Website
    Private, nonprofit Japanese foundation, supported by the U.S. and Japan governments, that conducts research and studies on the effects of radiation exposure
    http://www.rerf.jp/index_e.html

    Highly radioactive water has been found for the first time outside one of the reactor buildings at Japan's quake-hit Fukushima nuclear plant, officials say.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12881015

    Japan map of Japan Radiation
    http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=4870

    Chernobyl: fresh and spent nuclear fuel 180 tons
    Fukushima: 1760 tons. near the ocean.
    Today they finally found the cause of (one) leak of radiation into the ocean, a cracked reactor.

    First dubbed the "Fukushima Fifty," their number has now risen to more than 700 workers toiling inside an evacuation zone at the facility
    http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Ja...e+nuclear+crisis+anonymity/4548968/story.html

    Fukushima Nuclear Reactors Radiation Catastrophe, Japanese Government Lies and Cover-up
    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article27188.html
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Alert: Fukushima Coverup, 40 Years of Spent Nuclear Rods Blown Sky High
    http://www.infowars.com/alert-fukushima-coverup-40-years-of-spent-nuclear-rods-blown-sky-high/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    EPA officials, however, refused to answer questions or make staff members available to explain the exact location and number of monitors, or the levels of radiation, if any, being recorded at existing monitors in California.
    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/03/you-can-view-official-epa-radiation.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Impact on North America:
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23676
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Pentagon Cover-up of Data on Fukushima Disaster
    http://www.infowars.com/pentagon-cover-up-of-data-on-fukushima-disaster/
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Lifting the Veil of Nuclear Catastrophe and cover-up
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23764
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Nuclear xxx in the United States
    http://www.animatedsoftware.com/environm/no_nukes/nukelist1.htm#MidWest/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    I think this catastrophe will turn out to be far worse than Chernobyl because again profits taken precedence over safety.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtriAolCyow&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube - Nuclear Power: Profits Before Safety
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Radioactive Releases in Japan Could Last Months, Experts Say
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/world/asia/japan-fukushima-nuclear-reactor.html?_r=1&ref=asia
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    RadAlert Inspector Nuclear Radiation Monitor
    http://www.enviroreporter.com/2011/03/enviroreporter-coms-radiation-station/
    ----------------------------------------
    source site for above links
    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article27188.html
     
  7. SunLion

    SunLion Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    1,778
    Likes Received:
    48
    Earlier in this thread I made the assertion earlier that a nuclear reactor melting down is still safer than a perfectly operating coal plant. I'm probably wrong on that. But still, in many cases, nuclear reactors are safer than than other methods, even some so-called "green, renewable" approaches, like hydroelectric power.

    The worst single coal poisoning disaster killed 3,500 people; about 100,000 people per decade die from coal fuels. About 100,000 coal miners have died on the job in the last century mining coal in the USA alone. In one single year the US alone had over 3,000 deaths from coal mining accidents. Deaths related to nuclear power have been low, in comparison.

    In terms of "safe, renewable clean green energy," the worst disaster (hydroelectric project dam failure) so far killed 170,000 people and left 11 million people homeless. That's more dead and homeless than from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombs combined.

    I'm not saying nuclear power is safe. It's just that it kills fewer people than most of the alternatives.
     
  8. sunfighter

    sunfighter Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    292
    In the short run. You are conveniently ignoring all the future cancer deaths from radioactive waste, so I still think you are not looking at the big picture, and not considering the advantages of a diverse, sustainable, least-cost grid of renewable energy sources, backed up by natural gas. Not to mention that nuclear power would be completely dead if it were not for huge taxpayer subsidies.
     
  9. volosity

    volosity Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    i think New York is next. been reading and tranclating the work of nostradamus. he describes the earthquake of japan and the meltdown, then in another passage explains somehow New York sinks into a hollow mountain and gets covered by sulfur. keep a watch on a program called Quake 3D to keep up with the earthquakes before the news even knows. it's tied in with all of the rector quake monitors. lots of activity all over the planet even the gulf. it's gona cause a wave to take out most of the eastern coast
     
  10. volosity

    volosity Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    also the nuclear power of the plant is the danger, not so much the radiation if they can control it (not happening), but truly nuclear atoms are in our dna and have been for millions of years from the sun and other things on the planet. if anything what you see on shows about ugly radiated people living in the hills. yes that can happen but it would take alot more in alot more time, so people wouldn't just die right off. but it in the air has a different effect. instead of drinking it out of a dirty lake, we are breathing it it's a softer effect, the earth knows how to handle the problems we give it. we are just not smart enough to believe what all the other cultures have know for millions of years. such as Comet Elenin(Nibiru). we all knew of it, but forgot because our rule as humans is what believe what we can see. not just myths that are proven over time, Noah's Ark and Atlantis(Antarctica).
     
  11. sunfighter

    sunfighter Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    292
    No, I am sorry, you are wrong. The problem is the radioactivity. No matter what your political persuasion, the half-life of plutonium-239 is 24,111 years.
     
  12. volosity

    volosity Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    we get radiation from everything. we always have. the more there is the faster the evolution process goes but it's how out bodies and minds adjust to it. those closer to the source will have extreme results, and like i said just like drinking it is diffrent than breathing it. example is snake venom. it is still in the air after it's released with no victim,in the blood you die, drink it it's not as effective, what normal people know about it is it's deadly. they don't know how it differs as it's absorbed. we get radiation from the universe every 2600 years. the people working on the nuclear radation don;t even haveit all figured out of they wouldn't have this problem. one. we never even needed it for anything. giving 10 years later we invent everything eles. the problem is that most of asia will be taken out by the blast or even thier closeness to the radiation, i'm not saying i'm completely right but it's gona happen no matter how hard we try to aviod and solve the problem. Nostradamus has predicted everything that has happened and will happen. so have the other cultures of the planet. did you know there were humans on planet earth 25 billion years ago? when we thought no humans were even on this planet till at most 2 million years. everything we know about the cultures of the past that we were taught in school was and still is wrong on most parts of the teachings,mis interpretations, and how people think it went. and i'm not political.
     
  13. sunfighter

    sunfighter Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    292
    Please refrain from spreading your misinformation. This is a serious topic.
     
  14. Oz!

    Oz! Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    3,617
    Likes Received:
    8
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3eBMiJKit0&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube - GREENPEACE Measures EXTREME RADIATION 40KM From Fukushima - Why No Evacuation?
     
  15. relaxxx

    relaxxx Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,513
    Likes Received:
    760
    Was that supposed to be above 9999 parts per million? That would be more than 333 times normal BG radiation... but the video doesn't explain it and some guy start speaking another language - WTF?
     
  16. volosity

    volosity Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    and your 100% right huh. no one knows nor do they know what it will do in the long run. so far... there are alot of wrong people. just because u think your right don't make anyone else wrong. and i will add what i like to the conversation
     
  17. sunfighter

    sunfighter Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    292
    Well, anyone who gets their information about radiation from Nostradamus really isn't helping the conversation.
     
  18. skip

    skip Founder Administrator

    Messages:
    12,905
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    ^^^^^^^
    What he said...

    And ANYONE trying to minimize the horror of this catastrophe, should just refrain from posting in the threads about it. Or else. No more warnings.
     
  19. 7he4uthor

    7he4uthor Member

    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    this isnt nostradamus its biblical ...


    3 good YOUTUBES

    3/31/2011 - Updates on Fukushima -- Fairewinds Associates, Inc
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3B-KjZ7vk&feature=player_embedded#at=128

    'Fukushima nuke crisis - Chernobyl on steroids'
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7JvuUwpq40&feature=player_embedded"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7JvuUwpq40&feature=player_embedded

    Talk - Leuren Moret - Depleted Uranium
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DVhUcld4oY&feature=player_embedded#at=439



    :sunny:
     
  20. Delfynasa

    Delfynasa Member

    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    5
    whoa! Step away from the brown acid dude!
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice