Israeli Bombing of Lebanon

Just as I predicted, Israel is now preparing for a full-scale invasion of Lebanon. The real agenda, as I originally stated, is to invade Syria through Lebanon, as part of a joint effort with the US to take over Iran and Syria. That is what this was all about in the first place, in my opinion. http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/22060D49-9841-40F1-BD91-33E9CD62AD70.htm

 

They were there way before '47, but that's not the point. Did they barge in, or did the UN draft and pass a resolution stating it was there's? And what happened after that? They were attacked on all sides. And then won. And every time they are attacked, they win. And that's why the land is theirs.

 

You're really smart. Prediciting that the free world won't tolerate terroist nations anymore. Come on, man.

 

Yea, when a few soldiers get kidnapped that's 'terrorism', but when entire nations get flattened it's 'liberation'. What a bunch of hypocrisy.

 

All I said was that the free world has finally decided that terror and freedom can't co-exisit. As stated previously, it' a horrible thing that civilians have to be killed.

 

Yea, well they DON'T have to be killed, and the majority of people and facilities that the Israelis are attacking never had anything to do with terrorism in the first place. What the Israelis are doing is going to breed a lot more 'terrorism' in the long run by creating animosity against that country for it's unjust and heavy handed actions.

The Israeli Air Force and Navy were deliberately bombing convoys of civilians that were fleeing their villages being destroyed the other day-even in Christian areas that had nothing to do with Hezbollah. Who are the real terrorists? The damned Israelis.

 

Um, okay. What the Israeli's are doing is helping rid the world of terrorism. You have to start somewhere and they are starting in their corner of the world. Hopefully the US will help with Syria and Iran. Terrorism must be defeated once and for all.

 

Exactly. And that's already happened anyway.

 

Bush can't even figure out he's on the air and this guy is going to rid the world of terrorism? At least Blair had enough brains to realize the mic was on and shut it off.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/07/17/bush.tape/index.html

.

 

Condoleeza Rice is against a cease-fire and the US is rushing precision guided bombs to Israel to bomb Lebanon with, like Israel needs more bombs? Rice says that these are the 'birth pangs of a new Middle East'-more like death pangs if you ask me. Lebanon had rebuilt and was a prosperous democracy and now the US is helping Israel destroy it. Birth pangs of a new Middle East that's controlled by the US and Israel, that's what it really means. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/22/world/middleeast/22military.html?hp&ex=1153627200&en=ccb5206208860925&ei=5094&partner=homepage

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/124EB0C2-1CEE-4EF5-A3F6-048836DD2A59.htm

 

Condoleeza Rice met with the Maronite Catholic Patriarch as he was visiting Washington, DC-she told him that the US was working hard to make sure damage to Lebanon was limited-sure, right. That's the reason that the US just sent Israel a lot more bombs to hit Lebanon with, to limit the damage, right? Sure. And Condy Rice is 'praying' for Lebanon. Boy, I've heard everything now. Typical American religious mumbo-jumbo.

The Patriarch said the way for peace in the area is for Lebanon's sovereignty to be respected (which the US and Israel aren't doing) for the Palestinians to have their own sovereign nation and to be allowed to live in peace, and for Israel's security to be respected. Sure sounds reasonable to me.
http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=69652

 

The Israeli Air Force just bombed the Lebanese Broadcasting Company's (LBC) transmission tower, knocking out the main source of news for the country. Israel obviously wants the people to be kept in the dark about what's going on.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060722/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_israel

Well, at least the British Foreign Secretary has some brains, which is more than I can say for her American counterpart. She's warned Israel against the idea of invading Lebanon, and of everyone jumping to conclusions about Iran and Syria being the behind all the troubles in the region. At least she's not allowing the US to dictate what she can say.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060722/wl_uk_afp/mideastconflictisrael;_ylt=AhMkIn8HxLoUAO2xl4.vFr4UewgF;_ylu=X3oDMTA4NTMzazIyBHNlYwMxNjk2

 

The TV/radio stations aren't supposed to be bombed, but the excuse typically used is that they are somehow being used to aid the military. The U.S. did the same thing during the invasion of Iraq.

.

 

Seems like there was more stability in Lebanon when Syrian forces were still there. They left not long ago after the leader of Syria was accused of orchestrating the assassination of Hariri. Everyone applauded the Syrian pullout back then but now it doesn't seem all that great.

.

 

Well, if Syria was still there, I don't think that Israel would have attacked Lebanon like it's doing now. Israel is getting ready for a land invasion of Lebanon, and I believe that this is all a pre-planned staging for an invasion of Syria with American help. Since the Syrian military has left Lebanon, Israel won't have to fight Syria inside Lebanon, and the Lebanese Army doesn't have the resources to resist Israel, even though they say that they're going to, anyway.

After invading Lebanon, I believe that Israel is going to invade Syria from Lebanon and from its own border, pushing into Syria from two fronts, with American help, of course.

 

wat gives hezbollah the right to go into Israeli soil,kidnap 2 soldiers and kill anothor 8. Israel is not allowed to act? hezbollah can do whatever they want and Israel have to sit there and take it? why are people saying this is US/Israel against Lebanon? 2 foreign countries have a war and its Americas fault? why are the Lebanose not doing anything about the rocket batteries that are firing on Israel? when you say hezbollah is a resistance group, what from? the Israelis left years ago.hezbollah should have put down their weapons, but no, they raid Israel for no apparent but they were bored and wanted another war.I knowthat the words Resistance Group is on their flag but so is an AK-47, if they want peace then why is their symbol a gun?

 

Regardless of what you might think of Pat Buchanan, he gives a very interesting timeline of the events that led up to the invasion of Lebanon, and lays the blame for it right where it belongs-at the feet of Bush and Israel. Very interesting reading which includes facts about events that led up to this crisis that the media hasn't reported much on. http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51116

Part II:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51164

 

Wrong - its israil that supports the USA and so does it bidding in the middle east - israil is funded and supplied by the USA so Israil is committed to pay its debts with military action

 

Israel is deliberately and systematically bombing Red Cross ambulances in South Lebanon. Amazing. And Bush keeps saying that "Israel has the right to defend herself". Some defense. http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1828142,00.html

 

Condy Rice told the Lebanese Prime Minister that there can be no cease fire until Hezbollah returns the two kidnapped soldiers, even though the Lebanese PM says his country's been set back 50 years by the Israeli bombing. So much for America's "pro-life" policies! Lebanese civilians were bombed into oblivion by Israeli warplanes this morning just one mile away from where Rice and Siniora met today in Beirut.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/4A29747A-E58F-416A-BDD7-BB857B206219.htm