Is this LSD?

Okay....cool.
5-meo-amt is one I'll add to my list of things that fit on a blotter....but still distinctly bitter in taste...and long time for affects.

I've haven't heard of 2cb blotter. There's something in one of those DEA newsletters about 2ci blotter I remember reading a while ago. 2ci would have to be a big fat piece of paper, and 2cb would have to be pretty big to to be very effective. So, I'm guessing not the standard size blotter.

As long as I have options, I'm definitely sticking with little taste or no taste 1/4" blotters. It makes me feel safer.

 

is there any reason to suspect what you had was not LSD. it was tasteless. you felt it within an hour. it had LSD like effects. it was highly likely LSD

 

That's the bottom line.
Why would anybody today bother wtih mis-representing something as LSD when chances are that the demand for whatever chemical they are passing off as LSD is just as much in demand.
Back when I was young and involved with "stuff" and somebody came to me and wanted to sell me blotters of DOC I would tell them to fuck off because I didn't know what it was and neither did 99% of other drug purchasers. Today everybody interested in psychedelics knows about RC's, so it just isn't financially feasible or sound for somebody to pass something else as LSD.
There are just as many people who will by bromo blotters as will buy LSD, no real need for deception to make a buck, and that's what it all boils down to.

Think about it people, it just doesn't make sense in today's psychedelic market to be deceptive the same as it did 40 years ago.

 

^^^i dunno, i think a lot of people would still rather have LSD than any research chem.

 

I think what you are saying pb smith actually contradicts the point you are making. The demand for LSD is far greater than the demand for those microgram rc's but with the accessibility to do-x chemicals its easy to see why someone would pass it off as LSD.

Its also financially sound as well but I don't want to really get into the dealing aspect of it.

 

I agree most people would probably rather have LSD. My point is that when I was younger there was NO market for RC's at all, and MDMA had just barely begun to hit the street.
Today there isn't as much of an incentive for a dealer to be unscrupulous.
1) more people know about RC's and that decreases the likelihood that someone would not notice.
2) money can be made from RC's without the need to misrepresent them.

If I wanted to burn people with acid, why not just sell blanks? Why take the time and effort to create "fake" acid using some other chemical? I could sell blank sheets AND the RC's and make even more money.

I'll bet you could hit some festival with 500 blank hits and sell them all and be gone before anyone realized they were burned. Why waste perfectly good RC's?

Greed will drive people to do just about anything, that I think we all can agree on.
But just because it's bitter doesn't mean it isn't LSD.
If you are dropping liquid right on your tongue and it's bitter, then that is a cause for concern, but blotter paper is hard to tell unless it is VERY bitter. Sometimes the paper itself is slightly bitter.

 

...

 

^did I get this argument across ? I want to delete it if so...

 

I get your point, always did, and it is a valid one, as is mine. I don't see a need for argument. I just doubt that such deceptions occur that often.
Like I said, greed will make people do anything. Look at the DEA records of confiscated lsd, very little misrepresented.