Thats gross man. To be honest I'll probably punch his fucking lights out and call the police... the sick fuck. I'm a bastard Libertine.. but I'm not a fucking bastard...
Hmmm, he wouldn't talk to me anymore because we would clash. I wouldn't hate him but I wouldn't change to accommodate the fact that he was a fucking queer. I'm not a homophobe but my son?!!?!!?! Ohhh hell no :cheers:
...but you wouldn't punch him? How is being gay different from being a paedophile other than the fact that it's more socially accepted?
No... think about it. Neither is "natural" in the sense of survival. Pedos have sexual urges for children, who cannot reproduce...while gay people have sexual urges for the same sex... so they cannot reproduce. Both are ver common yet repressed throughout human histroy. Your hate of paedophiles is generated only by the current cultural stigmatas. Paedophiles just got it tougher than gay people... it's hard for them to find a consentual partner. (Read "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov... very good and humorous book about the subject in general... Humbert Humbert is one of my favourite literaly characters) I have nothing against consentual sex... shit, even if someone wants to fuck a goat, and it's proven that the goat wants it too... then let them go at it.
Sorry but your chatting shit... You can't compare a gay man with a sexual predator that violates little children. A gay couple are concentual adults, living life without harming others. Child molesters damage the innocent and vunerable. You need your head examined dumb ass:withstupi
vraiment. Well, the bolded bit. Consent is, well, very meaningful. Informed consent that is, knowing the repurcussions of your actions, of what sex means and all the potential problems.... yeah.
I am not talking about people who act on the desires, I'm talking about the desires themselves. Anyone who violates anything without consent is guilty... that is beyond the point. ...and my ass is not dumb, it does its job very well.
Yeah, big difference. I think I may know where you are coming from but the big difference is children dont know enough to consent and two consenting adults- come on now. Weird comparison there.
Neither are natural for reproduction but the difference lies in freedom of choice. Can a 9 year old make a CHOICE like that? Can two adults of the same sex? There is your difference so your argument is beyond flawed.
Can a 9 year old make that choice? Yes. Should a 9 year old make that choice? No. I am in no way supporting this, but a 9 year old can easily make that choice, and in past times such a choice wouldn't have been questioned. It is not a matter of should, or mature enough, or so... it's a matter of can and can't. It is up to society to determine if that choice is legit, and this society will ofcourse determine that it is not... and I would whole-heartedly agree with that. My argument is that homosexuality and paedophilia are not very different when views from basic animalistic roots and when compared to the process of human evolution and their contradiction to it in their mere existance. I am not going into right or wrong here.
^You can right. A 9 year old isnt stupid and when I was nine I thought about sex and stuff... but you are also right that a nine year old SHOULD not be able to make that choice because they are not matured in other ways (emotional for one)... Adults should never exploit that.
I understand. I re-read what you wrote and I do get your point. I guess it's just not one that I want to think about much because of the emotional intelligence aspects are so different in the two cases. However you did have a point. Ill leave it at that.
Of course! People can do what they like if their not doing it on my property. Unfortunately the government has forced me to have that state of mind.
I don't really think your a dumb ass. Your harmless from what I've seen... you're just a bit of a twat.