Iran agrees to curb nuclear activity at Geneva talks

Today the headlines read "This was a disaster for America". More of oscumma arming muslims and promoting world war.....

 

Study/Read. Find some connections. Pass them on.

Oil prices fall after Iran agrees nuclear deal

Oil prices have fallen after Iran agreed a deal to curb some of its nuclear activities in return for an easing of international sanctions.

Iran holds the world's fourth-largest oil reserves, but its exports have been hurt by the tough sanctions against it.

Though Iran will not be allowed to increase its oil sales for six months, the deal has eased tensions in the Middle East - a key oil-producing area.

Brent crude was recently down 64 cents at $110.41 a barrel.

It had fallen to as low as $108.05 earlier in the trading session. Meanwhile, US light sweet crude was down $1.01 to $93.83, having fallen as low as $93.08.

U.S. extends Iran oil sanctions waivers to China, India, South Korea

Under the Geneva accord, the P5+1 agreed to pause efforts to further reduce Iran's crude oil sales, allowing consuming countries to continue buying their "current average amounts of crude oil." The interim agreement is meant to build confidence for a final agreement on the nuclear program.

 

Where were these headlines? Post an article or two.

(any chance in toning down the 'ol intolerance/hate/prejudice thing? )

 

Not likely. There are three powers doing nothing but gearing up to attack the US and anyone who thinks what kerry and obama are up to has anything good for this country about it are naive at best. Read more than one news source and try to avoid the "Christian Science Monitor" and "The View"....ahahahaha!

 

OddApple

Why not? I meant in general.

' I guess I spend my day making yummy stuff, tending to living things and the things of beautiful life and doing what I can for the wellbeing and happiness of the world. '

Spreading hate around, it seems : /

Anyhoo, I just asked for some articles to read that had headlines such as:

"This was a disaster for America"

Not too much to ask for is it?


P.S: I don't read the CSM (not being Christian) and I can't watch 'The View' (I live in the UK, It's not shown here)

 

I spend my day the same way you do, just knowing it's on borrowed time. I put out the rose color for others but I don't let it blind my eyes when china has been bragging (even a map) on how they can strike us before we even know it and all the threats around syria.
It's not something I spend a lot of time on, just trying to be aware as our so-called "president" lies and pretends he's doing one thing, while constantly being caught doing another.

 

OddApple

I don't spend my day like you do, I can assure you.

Post some articles about how China is bragging it can strike you before you even know it, and the original issue ("This was a disaster for America").

At the moment it just sounds like stuff from the top of your head...

 

Nice try, but do your own homework. Your whole business is drawing people into long ass debates with someone who has no real merit to even talk to. It does not matter a jot what you say, you have no power to control or change life for anyone and at least I have put more lives back on their feet and destroyed more disease than you can even understand. All you are is "empty opinion debate" which doesn't feed or heal anybody.
You are insulting and I feel like you just want to pretend for your own purposes. You need to go back to "debating spirituality" to get someone else to talk to you. I was done before you started throwing your pathetic empty insults, so how about just go blow smoke at someone who is as pointless and self justifying as you.
I really don't care if you can google your own news or not. You all laid down your rights over there long ago and are in much worse shape than we are and have been.

 

I thought you might say that.
The truth is, I would imagine, there isn't any consensus within the American news that supports: 'This was a disaster for America. More of oscumma arming muslims and promoting world war...'
So, instead of just admitting it's your opinion, you attack me. Staying classy, I see.

Not really.

I didn't realise we were in a pissing contest.

This doesn't even make any sense.

'You are insulting'

Do you ever re-read your posts?

I can 'Google the News' That wasn't really the point.
You said: Today the headlines read "This was a disaster for America".

So quit obfuscating and maybe post a few news sources where it does say something along those lines. I WOULD like to read them.

It doesn't matter if it is your own opinion - just be honest if it is.

 

Look it up yourself lazy ass. You are nothing but a blame/troll/post whore who has no point and rambles on and 'who', 'They' etc. Good ol wiki/google links to a web of shit.

China's woman's army has more soldiers than all of ours, Fact. Go off that, Use common sense, Id say they have a fighting chance. Plus add more FACT Osama has sold us out to china so much they stopped buying, They know they are buying shit caused in the last 5 years and im surprised osamacare hasn't been scammed to them. Sad thing is, They are too smart and wouldn't fall or that shit, Only dumb fuck dem/libs.

 

A map. Bragging that they could hit us before we know it?? Where's that shit? I would like to see that.

 

Sorry Scratcho, that shit only exist in some peoples minds:willy_nilly:

 

Should have known. Thanks for reminding me, YC.

 

China says it can nuke U.S.
America's Diplomatic Disaster
There's a couple links that will answer your questions odon.

 

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/31/inside-china-nuclear-submarines-capable-of-widespr/

 

OK then. Why we let ONE MORE product from China darken these shores, I'll never know. We should cut those fuckers off now.

 

Oh your source is so much more reputable...

Wiki;
The Washington Times is a daily broadsheet published in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 1982 by the founder of the Unification Church, Sun Myung Moon, and until 2010 was owned by News World Communications, an international media conglomerate associated with the church.

:rofl:

 

Thanks.

I'd have never found the second article.

I suppose I could have looked up China/Nuclear Weapons/America.
So for not doing that, yes I was a little lazy.

The articles that have been posted are referring to China's nuclear deterrence capability.
Which, I guess, can be characterised as 'bragging'.

The U.S tends to call it: Nuclear Posture Review

If the language in the articles was the same as Chinese officials then, yes, I guess 'bragging' is somewhat true.

Your 'bragging' is a little bit more of a sombre affair these days.
I would imagine when the U.S was first capable of a nuclear deterrence they were exuberant in their 'bragging' too.
Perhaps the U.S even produced a popular TV show about a secret nuclear submarine.

So, 'Yogi' what am I supposed to take from the fact China might have more soldiers than the U.S, and that it is talking about it's Nuclear deterrence capability?

That China plans to invade the U.S with ground troops or Nuke the crap out of the U.S in the not to distant future?


At the very end of 'Indy Hippy's' article it states:

'It bears noting that China has a no-first use pledge when it comes to nuclear weapons, and thus its nuclear doctrine pledges to only use nuclear weapons in response to it being first attacked by nuclear weapons.'

I'm not sure what 'OddApple' was trying to suggest (and what I actually wanted to know)
So posting an article of his choice might have been a good indicator.
That's all I was after.

Bragging that they 'can strike us before we even know it' is somewhat of an over simplification of the reality, isn't it?

 

*chuckle*

 

Point is that it was there and glad you get a laugh but you're still trying to pull your foot out for cover. So bite me ahaha!