Ok, we got to that part. Now next step. The whole gay - anti gay argument, if you've only ever heard 3/4 of the argument, and its been the whole time like trying to solve a puzzle but you only ever had 3/4 of the pieces 40 years trying to work it out with 3/4 of the pieces, but you could have worked it out in a day if you had all 4/4 Are you sure there arent any people out there that have all 4/4 of that puzzle at 6 yrs old? But that cant be true, becuase that would mean ever person you have ever known either didnt know or didnt tell you, all the media and everything on the internet at your fingertips, and yet you still cant find out what that last 1/4 is, cant possibly be true right And it would also mean all that time spent with just the 3/4, kind of a bit of a waste of time
I've been catching up on and reading this insanely crazy (thank you all) thread and had to stop right here before going on to ask something... Because you mentioned something earlier about breast feeding.... and then again.... but I don't know what your point is? You're not trying to say that breast feeding babies (or even toddlers) has anything to do with anything, are you? (Super confused.)
This is bullshit. I have seen many gay people have children....anyone will that physcally is able, if they want to, will....so this is just a conspiracy theory to add more prejudice.....just like the theory that Christians do not believe in birth control to make more Christians....People do what they want, basically, regardless of their sexual orientation, religion, etc. I have also seen gay people marry the opposite sex and come out of the closet years later...You cannot form one idea to fit everybody. It cannot be done. Everyone is different...period.
Not to mention the fact that the illuminati should have MUCH better ways to control the population than trying to turn people gay.
Hmm. What can I tell you, I was kidnapped as young child for sexual purposes and then spent the rest of my childhood being sexually assaulted and abused by people of every age group (children, teens and adults). Hell, I got my first sexually transmitted disease when I was 11 years old! Made me so sick, I was comatose for 2 fucking months and now have to suffer life-long damage to my heart (myopathy). What was the disease? Mono. The kissing disease. And I got it by kissing a boy, my age, whose father was sexually abusing him. WOW, cry me a river ... stories like this are a dime a dozen. I guess you can say that my knowledge of human sexuality is "biased", or maybe even tainted. The most significant thing in my early life was a faggot of an uncle who decided to rape the family boys. He's a faggot because he was married to a woman but indulging in sexual relationships with other men, and with boys. That's not the definition of a gay man. That's the definition of a faggot, a predator and an evil person. He isn't even a man. He's just a human being with a sick dick. He single handedly destroyed MANY families, and individuals, in what he did. So please do excuse me and the rest of the world if some matters are not as pure and innocent as some people would like to think they are. THIS is one of those "let's not go there" conversations that people wish to avoid. Tell me. Just what exactly do you think a 6 year old knows? When I was 6, all I knew was that adults don't protect and that they are very, VERY dangerous. I was BRUTALLY sexually aware, and experienced, from before kindergarten age. It fucked me up FOR ALL ETERNITY. The real evil is when totally abnormal is made to be normal, on account of commonality.
ginalee14, talking about LGBT issues in school isn't going to lead to the above. It doesn't work that way. 'totally abnormal is made to be normal' Homosexuality isn't 'abnormal'
It means they'll sell less of their newspapers ... so they don't have to go to the trouble of printing nearly so many of them.
I didn't say anything about causation. I simply responded to gorilla's comment about what a 6 year old knows. Don't take my comment about abnormality out of context and misapply it, kay? Thanks.
illuminati or no illuminati, gay agenda or no gay agenda, de-population, by every NON-draconian means, is a VERY GOOD idea, before nature finds some much more painful and unpleasant way of doing so the hard way, as it invariably will, if we don't do so more painlessly ourselves first.
I believe there is a "homosexual agenda" but that the goal isn't just to reduce population or to get people to not breed. It's also pedophilia, they want to sexualize children through movies and television. So it's a dual motive, these so called "elites" do want to reduce population but also to poison the minds of the youth, and cause them to go astray, away from their true destiny.
I don’t know we heterosexuals wrote the book on sexual deviant behavior. While I've never practiced sodomy there are many so-called normal couples who regularly engage in such activity. As for pedophilia, statistically the percentage of underage girls being raped by heterosexual men far exceeds the number of boys at the hands of those flaming misfits. Hotwater
hotwater, you make valid points and i'm not going to disagree with you. and you're right heterosexuals aren't saints and in fact are often alot worse then so called perverts or homosexuals. but i meant pedophelia thats sort of outside gay/straight parameters don't you think? if a person is a pedophile what difference does it make whether that person is a straight pedophile or a gay pedophile, they're all immoral and bad people.
If you were gay (which is about 3% of the population) wouldn't you want to increase your numbers? I mean these guys can pump all the sperm they want into each other and there numbers will not increase; but by leading our youth astray they can in some sick perverted way direct their sexual orientation Hotwater
I get so tired of this analogy. Being gay and being a pedophile are not the same thing and you are an idiot if you think they are. Gay= attracted to sexually mature people of your gender pedophile=attracted to people under the age of sexual maturity sometimes of your gender sometimes the other. Sounds like you are a homophobe.
Its tricky, because once you hear the pedo comment, thats what you'll focus on, ohh thats shocking, we are not supposed to talk about that. But in this case thats just the tool used to attack, whatever he/she thinks will work best But its the part I've bolded there that he/she is really on about. Astray? astray from what? Their true destiny?....to stay put in suburbia, to eventually look after the old farts that spent so much time, money and energy raising them. Was never the way it was supposed to work, their kids were never really going to pay for their retirement, unless they win that lottery and get one thats super successful, for the most part their kids then pay that forward, that time money and energy goes into their kids not the parents, thats the way its supposed to be, the way its always been This kind of thing only starts to happen full force when they get to a certain age range, 40 to 60 or so, about to become grandparents or are grandparents, and only then it starts to click Look over the thread again, there will be one set like this that say something shocking, but then basically go into the economics of family values. But they'll be another set that sound like they are frothing at the mouth about the pedo thing. That first set like verminous_plague here, might say stupid stuff, but meh, kind of makes sense, want the family to stick together, worried about whats going to happen to them when they get older......but relative to that, that second set, working themselves into a lather about it, well whats that really sound like?
Just on that, I've been getting into 'Falling Skies' lately, if you dont know what that it, its for the most part an awesome sci fi alien invasion TV show, I say for the most part becuase their is one thing that really sticks out about it. I'm only up to the end of Season 1. There is this whole sub plot about human kids being harnessed, you never see a single female character show any skin, in fact the youngest prettiest female main character is this defacto padre bible thumper type, but almost every freaking episode as the storyline will have it, there is a teenage boy with with his shirt off. And along with that their is this whole weird thing about one type of alien the 'skitters' being obsessed about snatching kids and these weird scenes where they are having group hugs with the kids and patting them on the head. Now 3% is probably an over estimate, forget supposed giant media conspiracies, the producers and writers of this show would have been working to one particular demographic, those into the whole redneck confederate survivalist thing I mention the show cos its a great example of that demographic being lead without being conscious about it. Watch the first 1/2 dozen episodes and tell me what demographic you think its targeted at, a certain 1-3% thats going to be more interested in Americas Next Top Model or rednecks and truckdrivers 16 to 64
I understand your analogy; and you’re right, I hadn't noticed there isn't that one really hot babe who can kick ass I've been watching Falling Skies since day 1 because I grew up in Massachusetts and one of the early shows even mentioned my hometown was under attack by alien forces :alien: Hotwater
^This. I've known I was gay since the age of 17. However, I did not actually have any kind of sex with another man until I was 23 (he was 31). I've always been attracted to men older than myself. Also, most pedophiles are heterosexual, so it's weird to find out some people still believe ALL gay people are pedophiles. It just ain't so. QP
I think we’re all in agreement that most pedophiles are heterosexuals, but it doesn't lessen the argument that a higher percentage of homosexuals are pedophiles. I don’t know the exact numbers but this is after all a conspiracy thread which naturally elicits speculation and conjecture to support the idea that the Illuminati are furthering their own agenda at the expense of the homosexual community. Hotwater