A lot of what the Nazis did wasn`t so far off from what the Americans were doing with thier eugenics programs in the middle of the 20th century... wherein `deviants` (including schizophrenics, mentally handicapped and identified homosexuals) were prevented from having any future offspring. I don`t know if the Americans went as far as killing them, but history says they didn`t. I`m not an expert or anything, but from what I gather the war was caused by desperation and conflicting ideologies. Nazism wasn`t always about killing Jews, it was mostly about segregation... organizing the world into contained pockets that didn`t intermix. Of course there were also pronounced notions of superiority and inferiority between races, but this isn`t all that different from notions that drove British colonization and slavery before it. The truth is that people will always hurt and kill each other, and they will use any ideology that will give them an excuse. As a rule, human beings are violent, paranoid creatures, who hesitate only in fear of retribution.
Wow you really can't read I'm talking about a gun he mentioned made out out of a piece of pipe, no rifling involved all sorts of energy loss, not a gun that was made by a professional which is completly outside of the bounds of the question.... maybe you should go back to elementary\grammer school or just try to read the thread not in an unrifled piece of pipe with fish sinkers as the projectile and match heads as the propellent, again you really should read the question before making an ass out of yourself making false answers the reason the gun was developped in the first place (compared to the bow, compared to the cross bow) was to be accurate and quick firing, that is why rifling exists, that is why revolvers exist and I do not shoot automatic weapons, I take my time with my shots, the majority of my shooting has been with single actions and with bolt action rifles what a very specific scenario you need to develop to make your weapon superiour in your own mind...... but if the infrastructure didn't exist, if shooters didn't get special treatment these things wouldn't exist, again look at the original question it's part of the original question, as a matter of fact a sort of re statement of it, gee you are thick if a gun owner customer base didn't exist neither would these things, thus they are all special treatment, and for quite a few posts now I've been proving that without said special treatment you would likely not have your guns, unless YOU can put rifling into a barrel? aparently I know more about it then the pair of you..... supply and demand is simply special treatment on a massive level, we pay for it, but niche industries are special treatment, we don't need them but they're there anyway oh so making it so an industry is immune to prosecution even if it makes a faulty product that kills someone isn't special treatment?
in the 60's the u.s gov't was responsible for sterilizing "undesirables" in various states including new york and california (nevada wasn't one of them, they were likely confident the radiation would do it on the cheap)....
what a stupid son of a bitch but really what hes trying to do is to piss me off thats all what a jack asss . by the way the gun i mention would use black powder not match head powder thats another example i was trying to show. but really you are trying to twist words like a dick that you are. as far rifling again modern shotguns dont have any rifling thats why they are call shotgun or scatter guns.
ever used a shotgun with a compensator? and black powder still wouldn't help with the incredible loss of energy.....
a 55-60 draw weight (which is far less than standard, actually a training bow for small boys) longbow can easily fire 180-200 yards..... I think that beats a one time use weapon that you need infrastructure for
first of all, your ego is huuuuuuuuuge (can't debate it, it just is) second "some people will choose to believe what they choose to believe, there are some things you can't debate" then you would be debating with ignorant people=> things are right or wrong, can't be between right or wrong those who are ignorant just don't have the guts to say 'you're right, i was wrong' if you're so smart as you say you are, you'll say i'm right if this sounded arrogant, i apologize
for got something: if things would be between right and wrong, then there wouldn't be something called 'the truth' and there must be a god, or just god who knows the truth (almost everyone believes in a god or some sort of mistery)