i agree wiv ya bro! its skanky in my opinion, but hey its up to them! i also think this is probably bullshit lol if thats u in ur sig UR DREADS ARE AWESOME DUDE
It's not being against incest that makes you that way. It's the fact that the majority of people who stated their cases so vehemently against it, with no rational reason to back it up, were quoting the bible and saying that GOD says it's wrong, so it just is. (Who the heck is "G-d" anyway? I don't recall "-" being a letter of the alphabet...) The majority of the people who use the religious sentiment as the reason to not do it have no other argument against it, AND tend to angrily insult and attack the poster of the original thread. How is that love for your fellow man? How is that treat others as you wish to be treated? I can assure you, no one wants to be treated that way when seeking advice. The same points can be made to the person politely, without insisting that they are damned for eternity and that some fictional "G-d" is going to smite them down for enjoying life. There is more hypocricy which spews from the mouths of believers than anything which comes from the non-believers. While that does not mean that all believers are hypocrits, it does mean that any christian or other believer who treats people that way is not following what they claim to be one of their most fundamental beliefs. This in turn makes them hypocrits. SO, getting back to my point at hand, all of the "believers" on this board who curse and insult and attack the others here are all hypocrits, and you give your fellow believers a bad name and a bad image. THIS is how stereotypes are born. As for the original poster, I think that if you and your brother see nothing wrong with the situation, then there isn't. You do need to be careful, though, to make sure that it doesn't progress further than either of you want it to. BUT, remember, that statement would be just as true if you were just friends who decided it was time to have some fun. The fact that you are related adds some additional emotions into the mix, but ultimately it's the same scenario. The only real concern would be children, and it sounds like that's not something you would be pursuing either. So, good luck to you! I hope it all works out. If you have any more fun with your brother, feel free to tell us... it seems to be quite popular...
MICHAEL, if that is true, why do you continue to come here? I have yet to see you contribute anything that didn't involve the words "I find that disgusting and wrong. You're evil and damned for eternity." Why would you continue to frequent a place full of liars and perverted old men? What do you see in this place that you like?
PEace, a nice lady asked about advise. and now we should be helping her not cutting her down. shame on alot of you! now i pmed you with advise. i say. you didnt harm anyone& helped your brother learn. although i wont even think about my sibling. i dont even want to think about it. but you and your bro are really nice to each other. and i say it doesnt sound bad at all. i am not one to judge by name like lesbian,etc. those arent even in my judging dictionary. i onlu judge if it poses a harm to someone. i think you are fine. just try to tell your brother to tell his Girlfriend to eat healthier so she can taste & smell better! later the tired flower child
Hi. I've read some of the replies to this, and see they range from the banal to the objective. Isn't it human nature to impose one's own beliefs on others, despite each of us wanting our opinions to be respected? Incest isn't a bad word in itself, so when I use it I am only describing an act, no more. I've read arguments for and against incest. Many of them are very predictable: "incest=inbreeding=genetic mutation", and "permissive=do what you will as long as you harm none". The truth of this doesn't depend on the original post being a fake or not. It's a believable situation, end of story. The arguments of a law laid down by God? Well, for those who disbelieve the law, frankly it doesn't apply. You might hate that, if you believe the rightness of the law. But, at the same time, you are bound to not apply it to anyone else at a personal level. Or you are saying that the law was made by a God of denial - and that is clearly not the truth (although many humans make it seem otherwise). At the same time, permissiveness poses other difficulties. Should we each do what we feel like, without having any responsibility for our actions? I don't think so! So left with a purely medical-genetic argument, inbreeding resulting in (oversimplified) dominance of one gene over another to the point that a "bad" gene can become overdominant....thereby "corrupting the gene pool" or something akin to that. Well, in relation to the original post, that's rubbish. It is a fact that incest does not result in this kind of thing unless it is used as a method of creating offspring over successive generations. I don't think that anyone would say that is happening here. The only negative thing that might happen is that it grows to the point where one or the other, or both, involved begin to feel guilt for the act, and/or others react negatively and perhaps with the intent to inflict physical or mental harm on those involved. I don't think that's happening here - although some posters' desire impose their standards upon the poster would probably eventually cause some psychological problems. What is right for the poster is that she did what she did voluntarily and initially at least to help her brother. Although she might feel some guilt, I believe that was caused by conditioning and she should know there is no need to worry about it. The entire story, fake or not, is clearly not an attempt to titillate. It's a description of a sensitive reaction between siblings, and in that she should be commended. There may be few of us who would do the same in the same circumstances. We would be more human if we dropped the burden of guilt and simply openly helped others, and it is more likely to begin within a family than outside one.
I agree, if the original poster had just said 'incest lets have a discussion, it would never have taken off to this extent. Its also good to see that at least 50% of posts are nonjudgemental, hopefully it may be a sign that we are becoming more open minded as a society. S
It's not a myth; closed comminities like the Amish are beginning to have problems because of a limited gene-pool; it's not because of incest, but it's close; and then there are the Spanish Habsburgs during the 16th and 17th centuries etc., it got to the point where they were inbreeding so much that some of them had these massive jaws and they could hardly eat and drink because they were inbreeding. Most cultures have incest taboos, and for good reason; they may not have understood genetics in the past, but they knew that it would cause problems if they started inbreeding.
Inbreeding is BAD news. There is a reason why incest is taboo, and inbreeding is it. Thanks to contraceptives we don't have to worry about inbreeding anymore, but that isnt' the same thing as inbreeding being a good idea.
speaking from an evolutionary stand point, we are animals....animals fuck anything that will let them pretty much, what makes us different? speaking from a free loving hippie standpoint, if it feels good do it who gives a fuck if society frowns upon it...do what makes you happy, hell if you wanna marry the guy and have ten babies to him go right ahead, if thats what makes you happy, don't listen to anybody elses bullshit... speaking from a hinduish standpoint, the answer lies within....do what feels right to you(just make sure your brother is on the same page)
Once again, those problems were caused by successive generations of inbreeding. One isolated instance of inbreeding is extremely unlikely to produce an unhealthy child.
Honestly, I agree with whoever prelied the first time. I think it's so amazing that you two can be so comfortable with each other, it's so rare these days. And who better to teach him this stuff than someone close to him that won't hurt him; someone he can trust? I don't think you should be embarrassed, it's beautiful and you helped him out a lot
To be totally honest, the story actually got me hot. I do believe that what happened was purely innocent in the beginning, but has progressed to a point where some serious decisions are needed to be made. Oviously I think it is best that the sex stops. Accidents can and do happen. You'd hate to end up pregnant with your Brothers child. Somehow I don't think the news would go over well where ever you live. This being said, there is no reason you cannot contiue being close with your Brother. Just be close in a Brother/Sister way (ie. no penetration). Danny
i dont know if this is true either. it's obivious this person wanted everybody to respond. i mean come on, putting the subject as such is just asking for trouble. oh well, hope things are all worked out, i guess..
Forgive me for not being very liberal-minded on this issue... Some things need to be kept sacred in this fucked up world. Family is (in most cases) a place we can go to feel protected. It's a totally different ball game to any other relationship we have. Bring sex into it and that's destroyed. Let's put it this way. How would you feel if you found out one of your parents had an affair. I'd bet you would probably be pretty upset about it, to say the least. That's because what you regarded as sacred has been destroyed. Yet it's okay to have sex with your brother. I shudder to think what's next on the list of okay things to do.