How we got to where we are.

Yes.

 

No, I don't. We live in the same country, scratcho. You know this.

 

hahaha---no I really didn't. I saw vinland and I----well, you know. (good thing i never claimed to be anything other than a dumb-ass roofer!!).)

 

ha, fair enough.

 

Bumpus.

 

I can't tell in hypocrisy the difference between careless action and misunderstanding the mistakes I could make. I have no errors in judgment, like Obama, as of yet.

 

Jesus, is that you? God, what's it like to be perfect? Oh yeah, republican, how silly of me.

Competition is the art of fucking others out of what they have. That's why I like Hacky Sack, it's a shared effort to try to keep it up, a communal mantra.

 

It's just the constitutionally arranged system of government. Economically it was meant that I, the president of the U.S. make mistakes a right of the good small business and consumer. Information fails good, hey socialist, knowledge.:daisy:

 

Either you need a little more punctuation, or we have a POTUS on this forum. Hacky Sack is Socialist knowledge.

 

It's called the president has a lack of transparency. He will get it to us, the common citizen.

However, the business's invited, I believe, do follow. Democracy shall prevail

 

There's no democracy in heaven. Referring to to your spiritual question in the religion section.

 

that's kinda how I remember living it.

 

I'm also confused about how a thread featuring an article that is about a paradigm shift that had a lot of it's genesis in the movements of the sixties turned into yet another fucking "tastes great<:argue:>less filling" discussion about politics?????????

I think my first post was the only one that grasped and expounded upon the original thought put forth in the article.

One of the reasons younger individuals don't often quite "get it" about some of the topics in the original article is simply because they were born after the paradigm shift had occurred.

 

^^^ This

 

I notice a trend that the only liberal democrats who truly have faith in the things PR rightly espoused.. are the aging hippies, moronic urban youth who haven't experienced anything but a free college education, good job, and partying.. and people who want to exist at the expense of others while being perfectly capable of working and controlling their own fate.

Most of my generation is seeming to swing rapidly to a libertarian/classical liberal ideology, and that makes me happy.

Anyone, at this point, who believes in big gov't and centralizing most or all powers into the executive branch is either ill informed, stubborn, or lazy imo.

 

Deviate

Just an aside here to remind you that you said you’d address the criticisms of right wing libertinism in this thread -

Cliche red herrings against libertarianism
http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showthread.php?t=473288&page=2

I mean you say here that -

But as pointed out right wing libertarian ideas seem really deeply flawed and likely to make a bad situation worse and you seem unable to defend them from that charge.

If followed such flawed ideas are unlikely to have a happy outcome.

 

Well, you are an aging hippie, right?