So if a guy has a lot of women he's a stud, huh? Theres that old double standard rearing its head. God, I thought this was the 21st century. OOOh ya know women enjoy sex too. If a woman has had a lot of partners she shouldn't have be ashamed of anymore than a man. A woman should embrace her sexuality. I have had in my lifetime probably 100 men or more. 30 of them in the last year.I don't know why women think they have to be so dishonest about it.
I've touched about 5 guys penises in my life so far. It felt odd touching someone else's penis & I actually have to admit, I got turned on doing it. Some of them touched mine as well.
My wife and I have been married for 34 years and neither of us have been married previously. She's only fucked two guys in her entire life. I was the first. The second was my best friend who fucked her for about six months (with my permission) after we'd been married for six years. (I was 29, she was 27, and he was 23.) She seems pretty happy stopping at two.
I think most girls are dishonest about it because, generally speaking, from an outsider's point of view, the more partners you've had, the greater the risk that you have contracted an STD at some point in time. Which I guess can sometimes be seen as a turn off.
The double standard- a key that opens many locks is a 'master key,' but a lock that is opened by many keys, is a shitty lock.
That may very well be true, and I would probably agree with you. The thing is, no matter how you slice it, when you're looking at someone who's had sex with 100 people versus someone who's had sex with 10 people, regardless of whether it's guys or girls, the first thing that'll come to mind is that the person who had sex with 10 people is probably the cleaner bet. It's simple numbers. Of course, after that initial, broad judgement call, you can start to involve other factors like maybe the person with 100 partners was much safer, or the person with 10 partners got extremely unlucky that one time...
So when you're hooking up with someone, and you don't know 100% what their health records say, you're saying it wouldn't matter if you knew that one person had sex with 500 people and one person had sex with 1 person? You would forget all about sexual history and sexual health, and that would play no part in who you had sex with, and it wouldn't change your perception of their current health one bit?
Oh--I have an invention. A little meter that installs on the taint and every time a penis is inserted in the area,it will click up 1 click, so that way you can keep track of-------ah--maybe that wouldn't work. How would you market a taint meter.
From a math perspective, statistically this makes logical sense given that each person doesn't know the other person's sexual history and it's politically incorrect to ask their history or if "they're clean" before engaging with a said person sexually. Also even if one does ask, the other person can lie. Still the title of this thread is so crass, and I don't trust the intentions of the OP.
You're right in that someone who has sex with 500 partners isn't guaranteed to have an STD. But they have a much greater chance of having one! And of course it doesn't make them a bad person. My initial point was really in response to some other poster who said they didn't know why girls sometimes feel the need to be dishonest about the number of sex partners they've had. And my point was that if you're in a situation where the "number" comes up, and you say "500" or even "100", I could totally understand why someone might get turned off... because statistically speaking, there is a much higher risk of STD simply because of the bigger number. You're right though, if the number never comes up, then all you can go on is whether the person was safe or not. But again, my comment was in response to being honest about numbers, which assumes the number is being mentioned. And in response to that same poster, who said something akin to "I don't see what's wrong with having 100 partners, explore your sexuality!", well... again the same thing holds true. Bigger numbers, bigger chance of contracting an STD. Sure, safe sex is not that difficult. Chewing food is not that difficult either, but you still bite your tongue every so often, and the frequency goes up the more meals you have.
I don't get it. I thought this was a forum for open-minded, free spirited hippie types and proponents of free love. But it appears the women here are not all they're cracked up to be. They're putting up a huge front by being here, when in actuality they're no different from the normals. This is the Internet, why not fess up? Who cares? No one knows you here. And no one would judge anyway. This same thread was on stripperweb and there were lots of shocking admissions from 37 to 65 to 119 then 121 two days later. It was fun to be around a group of sexually liberated wild women and free spirits all supporting each other.
I would guess that not every sexually liberated wild woman keeps track after so many! I mean why would they? Do they win a prize or something? I would think most of them are doing it, because they want to. Not so they can brag about how many.
that is good pipgirl. but be careful, you do not want to become pregnant or get a disease. be safe always. How come you do not wait to have sex till you get married?
it is awesome. but it is even better with someone you love and trust. then you have time to experiment..