That argument is as meaningless as every other time it's been used in some form throughout history. Reality does exist in a slightly different form within peoples minds, but no meaningful discussion can take place if you can't arrive at a baseline of sanity. OP:sorry, but your idea basically has no basis in anything at all. When you're heavily intoxicated, it could be easy to believe that you're sharing something with people who have felt that way. Well you are, but not in the sense that you're talking about. Meaningful discussion of drugs requires some basic understanding of science and the world in which we live. And you clearly don't have that understanding. And of course, again, it requires some baseline of sanity and intuition.
What would you like to share as far as objective standards. For instance, are these administrators of other realms empirically familiar and do you know their names?
Gravity has never been real nor will it ever be. Just imagine a world where if you threw a rock up in the air it would actually come back down to hit the earth!
because when i drop an anvil above your head it kills you. well i'm pretty blind really, and i can't speak alot for exactly what the objective standard is, just that there is one. but yes i would say that they are empirically familiar. but only for the places which they might extend their influence and perception over, as there may be places outside of their grasp too, like there are places outside of our grasp. for example we as humans only have influence and perception over our world here, unless some kind of experience is granted us by some higher grace. these beings that have 'higher authority,' so to speak, work much in the same way, in that they might have influence over their sections which they preside, but none that are not permitted to them. so in this way, they are empirically familiar to where their authority allows them. why? because power of all cannot be gifted without first knowing all, and the proper wisdom to temper all that power. so you could think of it in this way, they they are empirically familiar in they they abide by laws connecting and protecting them. names, no. but i do know, that they have enough authority of effectively quarantine human life. look around. i don't know if any of you have ever read the bible from a non-christian perspective, but it actually contains alot of knowledge: "He who enters not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbs up some other way, is the same as a thief and a robber. But he that enters by the door is a shepherd of the sheep. To him the port opens, and they hear his voice: and he calls them by name, and leads them out. And when he puts them forth, he goes before them, and they will follow him: for they know his voice. And a stranger they will not follow, but flee from them: because they do not know his voice."
I meant empirically familiar to you. You are not bound but by your own agreements. This is the meaning of condition. You couldn't have picked a better example. This is why I ask if you know their names, and why I know you are operating from myth, and why you fail to convince.
You think thats air your breathing, Neo? I can get into what could be deemed 'akashic records' with no substance at all. But I notice that different substances seem to zone you into certain portions of this information. I notice in this thread the word 'akashic record' causes friction. Lets not call it 'akashic record', lets instead call it, 'being able to intuitively percieve the information held in your DNA, genetics and body.' LSD seems to make me notice, through internal vision, the same components of my DNA, genetics and body that Hindu's readily noticed. I choose not to use scientific metaphor, not because I don't understand it, but because at times, non-scientific metaphors will allow you to better navigate reality. The world is not an unsolved problem for scientists and sociologists, the world is a living mystery. Use what you will because you feel it, not because you worry about getting the approval of phd's in some building across the states.
objective standards in the akashic records? I find the notion of objective standards in the third dimension a little absurd, let alone hyper dimensions. Objectivity is only agreed upon subjectivity.
atleast this is a crucial time in history where all science AND all religion is being put up for question, atleast from my perspective. I feel like discussions like these are good for evolution and the necessary mixture between science and spirituality.
I don't see any problem with describing it that way, it does let you access yourself, and you where made according to the blueprint in your DNA, but it's still more complex than you make it sound Yes, different drugs let you see different parts of your body and mind in new ways... if that's what this thread was about, well of course.... But you can't just go and throw religions or ideas into a drug so that everyone who takes the drug thinks them It's just that that drug happens to awaken a lot of similar feelings in a lot of people, that's all.
In all my time exploring my mind and body, I seem to stumble open something new, then about 90% of the time I come to find someone else already wrote it down. In the case of LSD, it made me find so many things that I later found were perfectly described in yogic text and hindu text. Thats why I wrote what I wrote in here.
hahaha...... IM the one that put all that stuff there. im already starting my fourth strand of dna. its not that hard to have a pure mind, people are just too caught up in themselves to even realize you dont need drugs to do anything with your mind