This is all a bit like the argument that says how so many women dress in such a way that they are asking to be raped. While it can never be denied that no man has any right, under any circumstances, to take physical advantage of a woman against her will, it also cannot be denied that many women also put themselves at risk by dressing in ways that clearly be considered as being extremely provocative. With this in mind, surely, what a woman chooses to wear must define whether or not she is flaunting herself or not.
Thanks - Great to recieve some positive comments. Women that either wear very short skirts or very brief shorts that sometimes reveal their butt cheeks are either wanting attention or just like to show off their bodies. The same goes for some of those that wear clothing with low cut tops either for showing their cleavage or what ever they dare. Just like guys that like to wear no tops out in public.
i think some chicks dress in a way for guyz to check them out for attention, because they WANT to be looked at. why else do women wear some shirts that show so much cleavage?? because they want ppl to check it out. if you dont want ppl to check you out like that, dont wear the clothes
True - I agree with you. Some that I have noticed occassionally, wear underwear that's very visible thru their thin material skirts or pants (trouser type). They possibly don't care if their underwear is noticed, espicially if the underwear is of dark colouring & are even more noticable.
No harm looking if you can even do it without them noticing. But I don't know how they would react if you winked at them & they took it as a compliment.
What about the mingers? They do their best to get your attention too,fellas! So-who stared at her cleavage?......
I prefer looking at young looking women with nice small breasts with either a cleavage or not. Then I look to see what other areas (shape etc) of their body look great too. And to think I have dressed up in women's clothing for a fancy dress party. Even went to the effect of placing something under my top to give the impression of having big boobs lol
lol....a typical straw man argument, to which I shan't bother responding. Other than to say, if you're going to argue, at least do so in English. Argumentation is not a word.
Or, maybe some of them like going outside without wearing a fucking snowsuit to keep creepers like you from drooling on them, and then blaming them. This is a slightly toned down version of "she was asking to get raped, dressing like that".
if a girl is dressed in skimpy clothes, it's not license to stare all you want if you know your attention is not welcome it's just not reasonable, however, for her to walk down the street damn near naked and expect that guys will respond with only precisely as much or as little attention as she wishes
This is not an attack on Ivory, but pls peeps, don’t debase someone on their english ability. No one’s english is perfect (not even mine...I should have use a cap E for english but I don’t care). Besides, there the members here who aren't native speakers of english and would we expect there...opps, I mean ‘their’ english to be grammatically perfect? After all this is not a forum on linguistics so loosen up peeps and write however you want
Bollocks. That's a definition that is not logically defensible. otherwise, fkyu is a word. people would understand it, wouldn't they?
I beg to differ. Argumentation is, indeed a word, as can be verified here: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/argumentation?s=t
The truth is, women dress that way for this reason. I'm gonna hate for saying so, but yeah. Women like that attention. But for God's sakes, be subtle.
He probably chooses to attack someone's grammer when he's not able to debate their points with anything of intelligence or substance. And I'm not attacking Ivory either. Just saying people usually do such things when they can't debate something intelligently.