good bye Ahmadinejad

so.. it's completely true...isnt it... the guy who gets his ass in the chair is the winner.

 

Legally yes

 

Please prove that he didn't first. I triple dog dare you.

 

You made the allegation. The burden of proof is on you.

 

I'm passing the buck onto you. If you cannot prove it, you have no truth. This is the way we argue with european.

 

duh, you want me to prove something didnt happen....

I dont think so. Once again I think you got nothing. You typed yourself into a corner and now youre trying to play to the crowd.

Post something that links bush to buying the courts or STFU.

 

Oh, so you think Bush winning against his opponent Gore didn't actually happen now.

Okies. You have no proof otherwise.

 

THE COURT BUYING. it's in the dam post you quoted.

so post it, or again S T F U.

 

The court itself was conservative and the decisions to get to the court were heavily dominated by people in power who were outspoken Bush supporters in a state that had a governor who was Bush's brother

 

Thats not buying. I want the names....tell me who accepted money in order to get bush the office.

 

"buying" in politics doesn't have to mean cash was literally used to literally buy something, you gotta work on your metaphors man

 

padar sag.

 

The fact that we haven't addressed the electoral college yet is very telling. Must meet someone's goals. I saw no push after Bush's first election to address it, why is that?

 

For those that are interested:

http://www.presidentelect.org/art_evpvdisagree.html

http://www.historyhouse.com/in_history/electoral_college/

 

A few states I believe actually held votes on ways to split their electoral votes, but all the propositions failed.

 

But there was no national push to revise the system.

 

Because it works equally, for and against the candidates/parties concerned.

The system isnt for the people. It's for them.

 

buying does not always need to involve paper!
things can be bought with favors, or .........

 

id, have to say,it does not work equally!
but the system was desinged so that the majority could not oppose their will on the minority, that being said, we are soppossed to have a represntitive gov. of witch we dont have at this time, 80%of the pepole that decide they want a certiane change our supossed representatives will vote contrary to our wants and needs and vote in favor of big money intrests, if you can show me they dont, i will concede to your kingship!

 

duh, "equally, for and against".