God does not exist

giving and receiving are the same truth

Your regard.

I asked you what's new?

 

there is absolutely NO evidence for God to exist therefore he doesn't exist. end of argument.

 

You're probably right. Is God allowed to be registered as a babys name in France?

 

Never met anyone named God in France although the biggest train station here in Lyon is called Part-Dieu which translates as "Property of God" from the middle ages.. if this is therefore true, The Lord should be financing its upkeep and not local taxes.. however I very much doubt this is the case..

What the city of Lyon could consider, is the forwarding all maintenance invoices to the Vatican and have them pay.. Catholicism being the prevailent religion in France..

If the Lord does not contrubute within say, 3 months we could petition the station to be renamed Part-Peuple, "Property of the People"..

fair enough? I mean God is very clever (or just lucky) having his name attached to this station, since its the busiest transit station in continental Europe..

end of rant.

 

If god can be railroaded into paying not to have his station renamed, I'll start believing...that the trained run on time, and not out of it. :-D

 

what argument ?

peace to existence .
no guns in the church .
the more you love , the more you can know .

 

The one you're fond of ignoring.

The more you can know, the less you love.

 

Nice to see you embraced the subjectiveness of it all as well :sunny:

 

God is love

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLhIw8_IK3U"]Love Me and Leave Me by The Seahorses (ORIGINAL LYRICS) - YouTube

 

First, God does not exist. Second, if you are referring to the Biblical fictional god, he is far from a loving god.

 

He uses faith, you use deduction.

 

At least my method lies in reality.

 

He is putting forth a reputation/definition we all can recognize.

 

Faith is also a real thing. I'm not talking about proof (just in case you go there, we agree).

 

You do realize the difference between faith and Faith, correct?

 

Maelstrom, if is speculation not scientific assessment. Your second premise, if you are referring to the biblical fictional god, and go on to describe said's attributes, prohibits your understanding of either the second case or the first.

 

I believe that god is the underlying nature of the way things are, from mathematics to instincts. Things will be the way they are....and sometimes they are more coincidental than not. It is the order of all things Macro to the Micro. In this case for me....God does exists...because these things do exists.

Now since this post is in the christian forum, I am assuming you are talking about the "Christian God" which I can understand why you would say he "doesn't exist". The old man fictional interpretation that most churches have I believe is rather primal, then again Christianity is just the skewed message of Jesus Christ, which I have a feeling thought a lot differently about god than most Christians do.

The bible was written by the group of disciples that didn't quite understand Jesus' true teachings. Which is exactly why the "heretical" portions from Thomas and Judas were left out.

_________________________________________________

God was created by man....ancient texts talk about their gods coming from space.....which means there is only one conclusion. Aliens.

 

thedope:

Not really.

Love can be conceived without conceiving god.


O.W.L.:

Those things you believe are god are what they are regardless.

God is a stopgap for those who are wearied by the unending nature of conception. It is comforting to many to believe all is conceived.

Where god becomes insidious is where it is used to deny human creators and creation.

 

You must have missed the fact that I referred to the deity as fictional. Man conceives of many things that do not actually exist. For instance, dragons and unicorns.