Girls, is your current Husband/boyfriend your best ever lover. And.......

Well first off, I know that I would not want an open relationship, I could not stand the thought of another woman with my man. It would have to be a cuckold thing. Does the thought of cuckolding the man I love turn me on? Yes, it does, very much so!

Jacob said that my situation reminded him of his own, and that was one of the reasons he posted. Well, the way Jacob described himself, reminded me a little of my man. He is also not well endowed, and he also cant last long (compared to my ex) he is also a very good and considerate lover, he makes sure that I orgasm. He does this using his hands, toys, and oral. The sex we have is very gentle and loving. He is kind, charming and genourous, we love each other to bits. A lot like Jacob and his girl.

In an ideal world I would like to have my bf, but also a sexually aggresive man like my ex(not my ex though). My bf would have to be into it like jacob is. The thought of my lovely bf watching me while I was being screwed and dominated by someone who was able to make me orgasm through penetration, (unlike my bf) turns me on so much. To have my bf hold my hand (like Jacob does) while the other guy is making me come over and over, would be very sexy to me. I totally get it when Jacob says that the love his girl and him feel for each other is at its most intense after his girl has been with her awesome lover.

Will I cuckold my man? It's something I am giving serious thought too! Will he want to be cuckolded? Its possible! He is very open to kinky things, and he is always up for most of the stuff I suggest to him. Like Jacobs girl, I sexually dominate my bf. Will I be able to find a bull that ticks all the boxes? Yes, I believe I know such a man. How will I go about it?

Slowly!

 

Thanks for clearing that up. I kinda figured that's why, though you praised the lifestyle even though you haven't and currently aren't engaging in it. The label of "hypocrite" that xxaru gave you was bullshit, considering that the only thing that's really stopping anything like that is your guy's consent to such a lifestyle.

Since he's got a submissive streak to him in the bedroom it, along with him being open minded to new things, would seem to suggest that there's a possibility. Best of luck to both of you, either way. =)

 

Only in your mind, bro. Everyone else can clearly see the hypocrisy of her ways, because she won't even risk trying it in her relationship. Now do me a favor and please refrain from trying to further engage me on this or any other topic related to this thread. I have no desire to discuss anything further with you, so there's no need for you to keep bringing up my name.

Rachel, I see your still hiding in shame :hide:. Anytime you want to woman up and backup your bullshit, imaginary statements you tried to attach to me, I'm game...

 

Well that, or you're completely dense and can't read (which is 99% likely the case). Don't come to a conclusion when you asked the wrong questions in the first place. She just said it's something she's trying to do, albeit slowly.

I wasn't trying to engage you on anything. I had that question in mind for her for a while and saw an opening to ask. Get over yourself.

Why discuss anything with anyone who is going to disagree with you and point out all the ways you're being intentionally obtuse just so you can push your own bullshit agenda? It's far easier to just quit.

 

By the way.

The fact that you're still harping over this is kind of pathetic and shows how fragile your ego is:

Because it's not so much about a direct quote from you, as much as it's about Rachel interpreting you being like this..

..as you being paranoid and conspiracy-minded about the intentions of people that came into the thread and engaged you in discussion around that time. To infer that the people coming in fresh are pretending or were recruited for whatever reasons, as opposed to just, you know, discussing shit with you. It's hilarious lunacy and just how big your ego is.

Jacob had you pegged as someone who either is dense or acts it intentionally, as to help with whatever argument their pushing. I'll say it again: You weren't interested in discussion in the first place. You're interested in dominating the discussion and using whatever dense, ham-fisted reasoning you can not to accept someone else's points. And when someone calls you on that, you either throw insults [eg. calling jacob's girlfriend a gold digger] and insinuations [eg. suggesting jacob wanted to jack it to your pictures] or you quit the discussion in general [eg. few posts ago, you quit out on discussing with me]. And that's fine. I have nothing against cowards. They're just frustrating to have any legitimate discussion with.

 

Great! I shouldn't hear anything else from you towards me then

^^^ Again, refer to my previous statement. I've quoted it again below, and will continue to do so until you get the message through that dumb little brain of yours.

 

I was right about you, but hey. Only reason I'm responding now is mainly because I generally like being told what to do. It's one thing if I have a liking or respect for the person I'm discussing. It's another thing when it's a dense egomaniac who can't hold his end of a discussion, like you.

 

Awww, you poor thing . I know you really wanted me to engage with you, but you’re just gonna have to find someone else to play with. I’m sure Rachel would still love to play with you .

 

I was more or less hoping you'd admit you were wrong about and, quite frankly, a douche to Jacob and his girl more than anything else. You're not a big enough man to admit either. You're just a dense little boy with an ego.

 

Ah, wouldn’t that be the perfect world… where everyone would admit when they were wrong? I bet Rachel would be the 1st to step forward with her admission .

I’m actually man enough to admit when I’m wrong. But neither I, nor the others who share my view have been proven wrong about anything. Let me leave you with a bit of philosophy… Just because "you" believe something to be wrong, doesn’t make it so .

 

I'm not even talking about the debate over guys sharing their gals. I'm talking about YOU, specifically, being wrong about Jacob and his girl. You said he was "weak", had a "loser mentality" and flat out stated his girlfriend was a "gold digger". All of that was countered by Jacob has been shown to be wrong. Yet you kept harping on about it. Not only were you wrong, but you were an asshole in general to both of them.

 

She is a gold digger. Jaco being weak and/or a loser is somewhat subjective based on the POV of the person making the claim. And if you notice, I wasn’t the only one to make such claims about him .

I guess my statements carry more weight than the others IYO…

 

Not really. I've gone in circles with both you and FX. None of the other people who disagreed or were hostile to Jacob stuck around long enough. Consider my part of the discussions in this thread as a reply in general to people who are intolerant of open couples.

"Only reason I'm responding now is mainly because I generally like being told what to do. It's one thing if I have a liking or respect for the person I'm discussing."
- Me, a few posts ago.

I've had a handful of people advise me to do what they've done and be done with you in this thread, and I actually like them well enough. So here's to the thread getting back on track to whatever it originally was intended to do. Hopefully if any women out there that post in this thread in the future, that are actually involved in similar situations to jacobs, they get treated with respect and dignity rather than whats been directed at those type of couples in this thread.

 

Regardless guys, it doesn't matter. Even any emotional reaction to each other in this thread is pointless.

The entire debate was fun to discuss, but beyond that if you're taking disagreements this seriously or getting offended based on stuff that could all be fake it doesn't matter.

The discussion should leave one feeling monotone. Contain whatever discontent you have with someone you were debating with in this thread to this thread. And have other threads start with a blank slate.

 

Speaking for myself, I haven't taken anything personally. Although his manner in discussions is going to give me some pause from here on out.

 

If you are a single woman and you are fucking two men, one 'nice guy' with a little dick who cums in 3 minutes and also fucking a stud with a monster cock who can ride you for 30 minutes, then as long as you are not lying to or leading on tinydick then who cares? The thing that baffles me is, if you are a woman, beautiful and sexy who can choose your partners from a large pool, why would you fuck a guy with a little dick and who can't make you orgasm unless he offered something else, like money or he supported you in other ways as a servant/ babysitter? Why would a woman choose a sex partner that did not satisfy her unless the sex was a way to achieve something else?

And as a man, you know what women are 'in your league'. if you catch the attention of a woman who is out of your league the first thought should be, what do I have that she wants? is it money? is it a Green Card? can you be her slave and do everything she needs , do her taxes, do work around her house,watch her kid?

But as a man, if you agree to pay the rent, buy the groceries, watch her kid while she is out fucking someone else you should just crawl through the slime because you are not worthy of respect.

the bottom line is, why would a woman fuck a man who does not satisfy her sexually?

 

Good questions really!

 

For me, I wouldn't. In fact, it's a deal breaker. There's no amount of anything that would get me past my need/desire for sexual attraction.

 

FX,

All of your ridiculous questions infer that the guy is a weak doormat and that the woman is an unsatisfied wreck who needs to get dick outside. You put your scenarios to an extreme that does not relate to the vast majority of these half-open relationships. They're not worth answering, because you're trying to press your agenda with the way you phrased them.

 

Totally makes sense to me!