Getting circumsized need advice...

It doesn't necessarily matter how many studies you read. They are all manipulated to say one thing or another and can never be applied to the majority of global population since they don't involve the global population.

Study A will say it make one more prone to std's

Study B will say it makes one less prone to std's

Well lemme tell ya, the only thing to make you less prone to std's is safe sex and not fucking nasty women. Doesn's matter how much skin you cut of your dick.

The cleanliness thing is pretyt fallible too since shmegma prodiction is directly related to health , diet , activity , and your daily cleaning routine.

It's impossible to say one is definitively better than the other.

Regardless of stats.

A man named Mark Twain once said:

" There are three types of lies : lies , damn lies , and statistics. "

Maybe he was right.

 

The one thing I have noticed about those who campaign in favour of circumcision & claim that there is no difference in sexual satisfaction etc. are primarily made up of those who are not only circumcised themselves, but have never known anything different that they can compare by.

As far as the claim that there is no difference in sensitivity is concerned, well that is just simply ridiculous.

Any uncut male will be all too aware of how sensitive the bared glans can be to the touch, such as, for instance, when simply coming in contact with his underwear can cause great discomfort, whereas a circumcised penis is dry & not sufficiently sensitive to even notice it rubbing against the fabric.

The only ones who would really be able to make a legitimate comparison would be someone who has chosen to have a circumcision during adult life for reasons other than medical ones, seeing as any medical reasons warranting a circumcision would obviously invalidate which was more pleasurable, seeing as the pre-circumcised state would be likely to have been causing pain during foreskin retraction.

Needless to say, I am totally opposed to any kind of juvenile bodily mutilation for any reason, other than those that may be medically required, and this opposition also applies to piercings. It really makes me sick to see a child in a pushchair with nose studs & ear rings, which are there for no other reason than simply to satisfy the mother's own vanity. Fortunately there are already laws in place (in the UK, anyway) prohibiting tattoos on for anyone under the age of 18, and in my opinion the same law should apply to any other form of non-essential mutilation - including circumcision.

 

Hayaz - for Xsake, will she also tell you how to wipe your ass, comb your hair, etc. I hardly think it a woman's role in a man's life to demand the removal of body parts. As you are now, is the way we have evolved over millions of years - and it is fine. The penis started out as an internal organ, and the 4skin keeps it that way. The glans it self remains full, shiny when atop an erection, and ooooh so sensitive as to keep your love life in top form. What do people like cutted with their unprotected glans know? They have nothing to compare! Unless you like taking a pussy whipping all your life, how about reconsidering your manly image, taking a shower a day, and (like me) probably wondering what the hell smegma is that he keeps talking about.

 

Hayaz - don't listen to the man behind the curtain - he is talking nonsense. Do what you want to do. Whatever makes you feel better about yourself.

 

exactly, don't get caught up with what's common, does it really make sense that nature would get the most important part of our bodies wrong? (biologically speaking), circumcision became popular because of the harm it did

 

yes, yes, yes. You will not have all the sexual pleasure that you have now.

Well, so then you won't have to take a shower but once a week. I surely wouldn't want to be close to you even with a clean "cut penis".

Another thing, In my past, when I met a person I wished to date, and there was a special attraction, I was I was willing to accept all things about him. If he was short or fat, etc. Caring for someone should not be conditional. I didn't look down into his pants so see if I was going to have feelings for him. It's rare that a young woman would see the "intact part of a guy" the penis would be erect long before she get's her little hot hands or eyes on it. This is something she may find out much later in the relationship. She will accept everything about you if whe cares.

You should think very hard before getting . It's takes a long time to repair and will never be the same as what you had at the beginning.

TWG

 

Hayaz asked for opinions from cut men, and women and not from fanatic uncut guys who jump in every time someone expresses a preference for the cut look and feel. My point of view as a cut guy - it is worth it - looks better, feels better, both for you and your partner, and is cleaner and healthier. Your girlfriend prefers the cut look - end of story.

 

That's because you don't know what a natural, intact penis feels like.


By the way, it's a bit hilarious to hear you say "I don't regret it" about something that was forced onto you and in which you had no choice whatsoever. Too funny!


My advice to the boy who's being forced to get his genitals destroyed: don't do it. If necessary, go to court and sue those who want to mutilate you. They will go to jail.

 

LMAO!!! Who's being fanatic here. Only extremist cultures, like Islamists, Jews and Americans practise this brutal, primitive ritual of destroying boy's genitals, to make them obey the rules of the culture. Just like they cut the labia off of their women, to control them.


The rest of the world, the world where men are left sexually healthy and intact, are not forcing anything on others.

Just look at your own messages. It is clear that you are sexually frustrated and traumatized because they destroyed your penis. Else you wouldn't be obsessing about this all the time.

 

If mothernature/life didn't intend for you to have a foreskin, you wouldn't be born with one, or it'd drop off due to evolution.

Neither has happened. End of discussion.

 

Stop spewing your fucking bullshit, it does not feel better, for either party.

 

Ahh, to be 18 again, free of logic and governed by pure emotion...

 

Once people learn about circumcision and what it does, if you truly learn, they see how unsightly the cut penis looks. If it is restored it looks much distressed.

If someone is not open minded, either man or woman, they will never know what they are missing. The internet has made all the knowledge possible. I am so glad to know that.

Google = foreskin restoration

and learn

 

I agree, if we pretend it's just a piece of skin of no value, then it's easy to say circumcision is better, but if someone researches what is the point of the foreskin, what does it do? as well as get over that the natural penis is different then what they are used to, it becomes quite obvious what the better choice is

 

The eye is in the beholder. What is unsightly to some is beautiful to others. Some women on this forum have said they think an uncut penis looks like a rocketship, and don't like it.

 

I just want to say something. I think it should not matter weather you are cut or not. A women should accept you for whatever you look like. If I were a man I would not want my penis cut. If it has more stimulation, then it probably feels better. Plus if I were a mother I wouldn't have my son cut. I would leave it and let him decided what he want when he is of the right age to make a clear decision. I don't really think it matter what a mans penis looks like. I think it matters that you love the person for whatever they look like(this includes their penis.) Geez some people are so ignorant, when it comes to certain topics.

 

Uncut man here, so you can listen to my feedback or not. I happen to think it's every bit, as valid than that of someone who has been cut since birth. Actually, I think it's more valid, because I can at least pull my foreskin back, while a cut since birth man has no clue what he's missing.

OK. I would mind that, but that's just me.

That's the only reason I've heard to justify why you might want to do it.

Basic biology, as well as (most) anecdotal evidence suggests that yes, you do.

No, some women prefer cut. Some women do not.

As others have said, it's your dick and you can do what you want with it. But mutilating any part of your body because somebody else wants you to, doesn't strike me as a smart way to go through life.

Male circumcision has historically been practiced in desert regions where water is far too precious to be wasted on something as trivial as washing. Therefore, circumcision has a very practical purpose. In 21st Century western cultures where people wash almost compulsively, the "circumcised is cleaner" argument is utter bull. Washing under my foreskin (or better yet, having someone else wash me there) is one of the simple pleasures in life and I'm sure I do it way more than cleanliness demands.

So again, the only valid argument for doing this to yourself is that "you" prefer the look of it. To me, the negatives of the procedure would far outweigh that, but again, it's your dick. :cheers2:

 

I got circumsized when i was about 18. I was cleaning myself and the skin got stuck and I couldn't get it back over the head.

I say, do it. It's clearer. I'm still as 'sensable' as I was before. Sensitivity (which is what I think you meant to say) is much higher now too

 

everyone says you lose sensibily, and its true, but with that, you can "do it" with ur significant other longer, and make her more happy.

There are both pros and cons, so do research, and talk to a doctor