does it bother you that the military is having urban warfare exercises

Let's see. The population of the world is
6,602,224,175


An 85% reduction would mean that the target world population is 990,333,627.

Umm, can the world still be run on that many people producing goods and services? Why is that the target number exactly? I don't understand why a decrease in population would be a benefit for the journeymen at the top.

It seems neither probable nor logical to ever meet such a target.

 

umm use some logic, with 95% of the population gone 95% of the needs for goods and services will be eliminated.. also you have to understand that the vast majority of those left will be packed into population centers and fed psych drugs so that they wont even realize how bad it actually is for them.. the luxury's will only be for the elite..

this is all recorded in speeches and doctrines at and from the united nations..

where do you think the billions gates and buffet recently gave away went to? the vast majority of it went to global population control organizations..

the theory is with todays technology the elite can live forever while we peasants are kept in check to provide the basic services.

really not any different than todays society ,,just minus a few billion people...

 

and a lot more sustainable, for a while

 

The WHO is certainly doing its part by inoculating the world’s poor with vaccines that will ultimately prove detrimental to their health, when conditions are right and the orders to proceed with ‘Operation Atelopus’ are given


Hotwater

 

even though this is a supposed "temporary sterilization" plan i couldnt help but go WHAT THE FUCK? when i read this comment..

U.K. Government minister Dawn Primarolo said,
"in my view, there is little point any more in feeling shock-horror at the idea of mass sterilisation."


the article is titled,
"Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least"



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=514542&in_page_id=1770

its always "just temporary",,"at least"..

its really true folks.....

 

Oh. Right. So we are talking soma and Alpha-Plus caste systems.

I'm sorry. What are you talking about? Your post seems awfully fragmented.

 

I know, he fully loses me. :tongue:

 

It is totally necessary to destroy much of the population. Current projections show that the population will outgrow the worlds resources within 20 to 50 years. The ruling elite must make a choice. Either the world will end completely, fall into a state of chaotic turmoil and war, or be systematically reduced to order. It is very sad to say, but killing billions of people is like pruning a bush. Cut away some and the bush will flourish. Let it grow out of control and it will turn into an ugly mash up that will strangle itself and eventually die.

Soooo... im drunk and can totally tell where these people are coming from. I hate to say it, but the people in power can totally do whatever they want if they really want to. Sorry people, most of you are going to die soon anyway. Do you want the earth to be destroyed or do you want the human race given the chance to start anew.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

 

Good. Then I hope you volunteer yourself to be euthanized when the time comes. Then again, you likely won't have a choice.

 

Nature decides what happens with our populations, not a select few 'elite' (whatever that means) humans.

 

Will people please stop quoting articles from The Daily Mail. It should be read as light-hearted tripe to distract the masses, like soap operas.

 

Who's quoting?

 

Nothing in that paper is really true.

 

True, most of it is tripe. But they also include a bit of truth amongst all the gossip and mindless celebrity drivel to condition the reader. That is how all media works. There is a lot of truth to that article if you read who is actually making these propositions.

 

I didn't read it. From years of living in Britain, I have learnt never to read that rag.

I mean, you can't even trust their horoscopes.

 

the quote was said!! that is what a "quote" is repeating what someone said.it doesnt matter what you think of the paper,a quote is just that..

are you people so brainwashed that you dont even believe a direct quote to be true?

 

obviously its your brain that is fragmented. my post makes complete sense to anyone that has a ounce of reading comprehension skills.

simply because you refuse to acknowledge the truth doesnt mean my post was fragmented..
just what part do you not understand?

as i stated before its all clearly outlined in U.N. documents,as well as several speeches from high ranking global elitists to the U.N..

 

surely you dont believe that?

wow this really will be easy for them to pull off...

 

oh,,well you tell me what periodical you trust to print a accurate horoscope and ill be sure and check them for news first..

wow,and im a crackpot?? lol

 

.