Does God Exist?

Well no, not just a noun. That we live our lives around is a lot of verbage. My point is we are innately devoted to whatever we prize. This is the god function so to speak. We are hard wired to find our good/god or we face a biological imperative to engage in energetic exchange.To the secular question the secular proposition is one of rules or codes of behavior we try to emulate or prosecute for and religions identically propose codes of behavior. The functional effect on the psyche is the same. Some thing inherent in matter emerges as self promoting.

 

but .. why?

 

http://youtu.be/DFXQlKf0dPw

why then, do I ask myself, are these things so important...

 

Lol, you were posting the same thing as I was, at same time Ace..damn I love syncronisity.

 

Ace, when I get on a pc, I can certainly do that, and will be glad to. In the meantime, its much easier to post the vids I already know the addresses to. I super limited as of what I can see at one time or text.

 

no, i quoted you.

are you high ??

 

Another model not inconsistent with fractal emergence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKtevjrZOGs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NJ-iqC6DMc

 

Exactly. Lets not forget phi, the fibonocci scale and number sequence..and the solfeggio .So with all these things being so persistant, its kindof compelling that the nature of god could possibly be an algorithm. If that be the case, I would have to say god does exist .

 

No, I'm not high. What I was refering to was your "but why" under the quote. My post hit the board directly after, in which I was writing what I did at the very time you were. Lol no, not high, just having fun .

 

This,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvJAgrUBF4w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mStMS7Qcf1s

 

Oh, ok I believe I see what youre asking. I include cymatics because sound and frequency affects things physically. Under the circumstances in which we can observe them using the toneoscopes, chiladni plates, cymascopes and mediums such as salt etc..we can observe how in realtime.some of the patterns created, flower of life and the like are produced with frequencies in the fibonacci and solfeggio scales..sacred scales, sacred music. Hasn't it always been said that everything was created with the word? Or sound?

 

And why has it always been told that man was never to eat from the tree of knowledge and life?

 

There are cymatic patterns found in cathedrals, churches and sacred places all over the globe. Infrasound, which incidently affects our bodies in a manner the produces "spiritual"experiences. Thus, sound remains consistant and in the forefront of everything we consider divine..

 

On the right are the cymatic patterns.

 

you are crossing quite a few levels of abrraction there dont ya think? we gotta renormalize it to a common value.

 

These connections with patterns and mathematics are fascinating and intriguing when they work, however at least in some regards to Böhme and Pythagoras, there are some examples which I see detract from their sign as 'divine.'

From what I see from wiki on Böhme's philosophy, he has 7 fundamental qualities to correlate with the Sun and planets in kind of an astrological off-shoot way. There is no accounting for Uranus and Neptune however, I assume due to having yet to discover the planets, but a philosophy relying on that tight of quality related symmetry, should have it's veracity questioned when you include Neptune and Uranus.

Pythagoras ascribed qualities in nature associated with particular number. With the pentad, it is claimed to be a sign of 'divine proportion' due to the 5 digits on the hands and toes of each limb. Sounds good on the surface but What about those born with fewer or more digits on their limbs? I know this is somewhat rare but certainly should be accounted for if we are to talk about 'divine proportion.'

 

" What about those born with fewer or more digits on their limbs?"

I'm really not here to argue about the gaps at this point as much as I am to simply present things that I feel pretain to the subject .Thoughts and ideas and theories for us to think about .And im not asking or expecting anyone to subscribe to anything I bring to the table.But to reply to your statement, hasnt it always been said that man is not perfect?

 

"you are crossing quite a few levels of abrraction there dont ya think? we gotta renormalize it to a common value. "
Im sorry Ace, I dont understand what youre asking when you say abrraction. Is that a typo? Had you meant to type abstraction? Or as in abreaction?

 

Im going to go with abstraction until told otherwise, as there has been no repressed emotional releases in my posts..unless youre seeing something I didnt feel.. Yes, what Ive presented is pretty abstract,in the manner it was presented.. to say the least. But if you consider Boehme's theory about god, it becomes more normalized.

 

I'm not suggesting humans are perfect, I'm suggesting that there is some evidence to suggest 'divine proportion' as it relates to human digits is a farce.