do psychedellics actually burn you out?

Well, I've heard of people losing touch with reality and becoming severely depressed with the "real world," after using Ketamine IV for a long period of time. They come to the conclusion that the world we are living in is a fake world that means nothing, and the real world is shown to you by Ketamine.

I don't know if this would constitute as a burnout?

 

I kinda came to that conclusion on LSD myself...

all except I think this world still means something, but it is you know as they say, illusion

 

i wonder if that's something unique to ketamine, it might explain some of its addictive potential.

 

yeah i think ketamine is so psychologically addicitive because it allows you to be a conscious being without a body, and to be arbitrarily large or small and to travel anywhere to anytime you want. And you're back within 2 hrs tops. 4th plateau is too epic not to be addictive.

 

it's a freaking cat / horse anesthetic... and it's addictive! honestly i can't believe grown up guys doing other stuff apart from the natural types(thc,lsd)...

 

^Just because it isn't natural does not mean it doesn't have any potential. Ketamine is actually an amazing experience, and I've experienced a small dose.

I don't understand the logic behind the idea that ONLY natural drugs have any use.

Also, it's not just used on cats. It's used for humans as well, but usually on small children because they won't remember the experience.

Also, how is LSD "natural?"

 

forget it, i don't need drugs the way you do.

for the facts, there's internet (outside the forums).

 

lol ketamine is the most widely used human anasthetic in the world today.

And so what that it's addictive, so is caffeine. Guess I'll never have another cup of tea ever again?

and good luck finding lsd in the wild lol

 

lol i can't believe you are comparing ketamine to coffee. it reminds me of my horse-tranquilizer-addict, coke junkie, steroids abuser, mammal-operation-patient friend... doing all for the ride...

lsd main compound was discovered and then isolated and synthesized, do i actually need to put a page with actual information mr writer? here1 here2


discussion aside, all i'm saying there's no need for some kind of drugs...

 

And I'm asking why is there no need? Your answer is 1) it's addictive, to which I reply that so is a lot of what we do every day, and 2) that it's not natural, to which I reply neither is d-LSD-25 (one of it's precursors is, but so what? One of crack's precursors is 100% natural, cocaine, does that mean crack is awesome?)

my point is that you are one of those people who look down on certain drugs for very arbitrary reasons, even though they can be very mentally and spiritually powerful and revelational.

Keep an open mind, it'll do you good

 

Mr. Writer just published you

check this out though...I don't think he was comparing the drug Ketamine with Caffeine but the effects of those two drugs.

for the facts, there is experience. reading around on the internet won't get you any more ready for anything than if you truly know yourself.

 

im sorry but i just didn't start an argument with a guy who goes by "mr writer"... i mean you should know what he does best... ¬¬

anyway writer, in 1) i don't "do" addictive substances during my day, i'm sorry if you do.
and 2) the point is you cant draw a line between cocaine and lsd and that sucks. coke is chewed for it's many benefits, his snort-brother (blow) is a preparation and crack is the disgusting remnant of that preparation.

killuminati, is there any other thing to compare? the taste? the color? of course we are talking about the effects! lol
and for the facts, it's only a sign of stupidity to believe that experience (say on cocaine) is more valuable than the amount of information about it.