There was no raging fire. That's just more bullshit you're regurgitating. When the firefighters got up to the point of impact, they said they would need only two water lines to knock it down. That doesn't sound like a raging fire to me. When you see buildings oozing BLACK smoke, that indicates an oxygen starved fire. Most of the jet fuel was burned off on the initial impacts of the planes. There was no "raging fire." That is a lie.
And what's your technical assessment other then insisting that 'most of the jet fuel incinerated on impact'.
I thought you called. Um, yeah, actually I don't believe in god. I do believe in a universal connected or oneness though. ehhh
The jet fuel would have all burned off by that time. If it was because of jet fuel, we would have seen black smoke immediately following the impact of the planes. Instead, it wasn't until many minutes later the smoke began to turn from grey to black.
Even the 9/11 Commission report admits most of the fuel burnt off upon impact. Look at those massive fireballs upon impact. It's common sense.
there are also many other items inside an office building, plastics, which are petroleum, which would have influenced the color of the smoke. Moreover, provide evidence that oxygen starvation dramatically influences the color of the smoke from Bill Nye or someone who can explain the direct corelation between the intensity of the fire to the color of the smoke. It's a silly argument if you don't, because it's something you've simply asserted from another conspiracy site as if it's fact. If it's not something from a poorly xeroxed conspiracy pamphlet from another troofer you're reading off as 'proof'.
nah, my penis is much more impressive. errrrm yeeeaaah um u said god, chris. i thought you meant me. apologies.