Cumming on a girl's face...

I don't know much about cumming on a girl's face, seeing that I've never done it - but back in Jan, I had a girl cum on my face - boy that was fun

 

I can just see you smilin'

 

it's totally sexxxy when a dude leaks his hot cum on my face... or my breasts...

it just makes me tingle *all* over.

i likes

 

Ah but the best place is inside you Much more intimate

 

My thoughts exactly. And feeling her around you, all warm and wet... I gotta go.

 

Gee i wonder why

 

Maybe it's like some primal instinct or something stupid (if no-one's already said that ... I missed a few pages of the thread!) ... I've never done it coz I wouldn't disrespect a girl by doing it WITHOUT permision but if she said yes, I'd be all for it ... my girlfriend's done it to me and you don't hear me complaining! lol

 

"Not so great britain"?
You do realise, that you wouldn't have won the world cup with Wilko's boot right? Can the poms even score tries? The Wallabies are still the best by far in talent and spirit
Now no offence, i knew england was bad at sport but i didn't know, that when you won the world cup it was the first time england had won a sporting title since the soccer world cup in 1966. How bad is that

 

Fucking hell, that was damned eloquent. It's nice that someone can actually admit this and not see it as being something to apologise for. It's basically a male power thing, but if you think there's something wrong or weird about that you've not been paying attention during sex.

 

I agree, very well put.

It is like a naughty forbidden taboo kind of attraction. I think that was what you meant by 'dirty'. It is obviously not unclean, heck, it doesn't get much fresher.... I have really liked the times my lady has cum all over my face....
And she enjoyed it too.

 

I don't think it weird and saying it's wrong makes it sound illegal or immoral. It's simply a choice.People are different and the bit about "not paying attention during sex" i don't agree with. Even if someone loved every second and pays meticulous detail, they still might hate the idea of someone cumming on their face. We are all turned on by different things. No one thing is right or wrong.

Although, the only thing that makes me close my mind off is rape fantasy. That's the one fantasy that is a bit far for me.

 

I agree with the violence not being my thing either. To me: sex good, violence bad.

 

All I'm saying is that a lot of sex is about power, or a desire for love represented as someone else being willing to do something degrading. It's a weird area that I can't claim to know much about, but it seems a lot of sex is about control, even if it's not on a level of conscious intention.

And I'm surprised rape fantasies are so hard for people to understand, given that it's just a logical extension of the passive/active, dominant/submissive dynamic which is present in at least half the relationships people get themselves into.

 

I understand the rape fantasy, the whole dominant/submissive. The dom/sub exists in relationships at some point, someone wanting control. Some rape fantasies can be more extreme, i'm not talking between a couple either.
Some images on the net are almost frightening, what about the incest fantasy? My point is, if you think about it, when isn't it about control. All varying degrees and not always obvious. As long as people are safe and consentual, adult, it's fine. But i've known people who have been that caught up in a fantasy, who thought it was no more than a game, that they made a big mistake.

 

I read on some news site that this guy and girl arranged over the Internet to enact a rape fantasy, in which he would break into her house, overpower and fuck her. Guess whose house he didn't break into.

See? Rape can be funny.

There's stuff on the Internet you wouldn't believe, someone sent me a clip of a chick (hilight space to reveal; do it and you'll see why) vigorously twisting a dildo down a guy's jap's-eye. I don't personally get a lot of it. But the rape thing... I can see how someone who was very submissive would enjoy it, and how someone who was quite into dominance would at least be willing to humour them.

 

If I am not mistaken, Geoffry Dahmer, and Ted Bundy both had prolific fantasies that involved violence. Then, imho, it wasn't quite enough anymore. They couldn't get off without actually doing the things they had fantasized about for so long.....
I may be totally wrong, and someone let me know if I am.
I am against violence, esp. when it is men hurting kids or women. In our present society, and to a degree in most societies, men seem to think that it is okay to intimidate, threaten, and verbally abuse their spouses. Then there are those that go further, and physically abuse. It is all choices, they choose to do it, no matter how much they plead that they couldn't help it.... well, maybe they couldn't help it cuz they had spent their whole life convincing themselves it was okay.
Anger is good, threats, intimidation, or any kind of real controlling behaviour is unhealthy, imho. So, although I would not say these fantasies should be totally banned from literature, tv, etc., I would say that it is like russian roulette, eventually the chamber will have a bullet in it, and then everyone is shocked that someone is dead.
Look at the OJ trial.... he got off. Unreal. And it is clear that he thinks the murderer golfs, cuz he seems to spend a lot of time at the golf course and he swore he was going to find the 'real' killer. He killed her. I am so absolutely convinced of that I can't believe they screwed up the prosecution that badly.
They needed a video of him doing it by the looks of it... they had everything else.

 

At the risk of getting back into Travis Morrison worship: Anger's alright, bitterness no.

Violence (there should be a nicer word for it) in sex can be cool, if it's passionate or spur of the moment. It's when it stems from something other than the moment it occurs in that it gets a bit dodgy. If someone has rough sex with someone because they like it, great. If someone has rough sex with someone because they remind them of their ex, that's baaaaad.

 

I agree with that totally. The intent is paramount, and it is also important to establish boundaries. Mike Tyson biting off Holyfield's ear in the boxing ring is a good example of not having good boundaries in place beforehand.
In some cases, my partner and I have gotten pretty lets say vigorous. There were times that books fell of book shelves and my back looked like a crossword puzzle in red ink afterwards. I always make sure that I'm not being too rough, and ask often, but with us anyway, I never have been, cuz we both seem to like variety, and have few things that we don't do. I once pretended I was her male pro. and she drove up in my car, picked me up, parked and I went down on her. She loved it. I did too, and there are a million other things I won't go into. But violence, or threats, etc. .... never. Just very aggressive, vigorous, passionate lovemaking.

 

Yeah, I have a thing where I want my partner to take control during sex. It's part of wanting to express trust and love for them, and partly because it sucks when you're trying to be the submissive to someone you know you could beat the crap out of if you actually tried. But it's really hard to describe this without eventually sounding like you want them to rape you, which funnily enough creeps some people out a bit.

It's not because I want them to hate me. It's because I want them to love me enough to do what I want. Sort of. See what I mean, makes no sense in words.

 

I think it is just an example of trying whatever you can to see if it pleases your lover. If you really want to totally satisfy the person sexually, you will experiment, and try new things all the time. I was lucky in this current instance, cuz anything I suggested, and anything she suggested, we did. Well, I chickened out once......never mind. But we both fulfilled fantasies we had had for many years, and both seemed to like all the same things, not just in bed, but in many areas. That is definitely a bonus....big time.